+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
.
.
So, how meaningful is this info?
.
. .
.
the people who research this stuff provided this graph of Greenland temperatures derived from ice core samples.
they propose that the supposed history of humans on earth, (I know, but this is a proposition) since the Younger Dryas, 13,000 years ago shows no warming compared to the norm track. So, how significant is this top info, relative to the bottom info? If we say that temperature recording goes back 200 years, then the hottest recorded temperatures are based on 0.02% of the last 10,000 years of human history. (according to "them"). The hottest recorded temperatures are less than a spit into the spittoon of history. And the info is meaningless as far as what comes next epoch.
Specifically because, given the record of the last 10,000 years, (if there were 10,000 years), current temperatures are still below the norm of the last 10,000 years.
![Exclamation :!:](./images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif)
I reworked the numbers to fit the graph correctly.
†, grizz