OT 32 H&R mag shootout

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
BenT
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2729
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: Northern Wisconsin

OT 32 H&R mag shootout

Post by BenT »

Image

Both Rugers are 32 H&R mags.The 4 3/4 in barrel one I've had since August of last year . I 've had some problems with the fixed sights. I sent it back to Ruger this winter to have the front blade readjusted.

A few weeks ago I ran across this 6 1/2 in barrel one. I had to buy it because it is the set up I originaly wanted , but couldn't find one it good shape.

Now hopefully tomorrow the weather will cooperate and I'll see which one I can shoot better. I can't afford to keep both . So one must go after the shootout.

Image


The one thing I noticed is that the one with the adjustable sight has the full size grips. The other one has the short grip and thinner at that.
hfcable
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2520
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:24 pm
Location: wasilla, alaska and bozeman, montana

Post by hfcable »

those are nice, especially like the adjustable sights....i bet it is a shooter!
cable
User avatar
Andrew
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2043
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:30 pm
Location: Southern Missouri

Post by Andrew »

Ben, I'll throw you $100 for the loser. I don't care which one either, I'm not picky. Heck, $100+ actuall shipping hows that? Huh? Yeah.. 8) :lol: :D

Honestly, I would get rid of the bald one with the midget grips.
ImageImage
Qui tacet consentit. (silence implies consent)
The Boring Blog
arjunky
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 733
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:47 pm
Location: North Dakota

Post by arjunky »

$250+ shipping. :)

Byron
cecil
Levergunner
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:30 pm
Location: Nw Wi

Post by cecil »

Would be keeping the adj site model. Lets ya enjoy much greater versatility with the 32 mag.
User avatar
Ysabel Kid
Moderator
Posts: 28611
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA
Contact:

Post by Ysabel Kid »

Wow, those are cool! 8) I'm really looking forward to the "compare and contrast" range report!!! :D
Image
User avatar
oldgerboy
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 250
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:39 pm
Location: New Bloomfield,PA

Post by oldgerboy »

The smaller grips fit my hand just about perfectly. :D
BenT
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2729
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: Northern Wisconsin

Post by BenT »

Range report , first of all I SUCK at shooting revolvers. Now that I admitted it ,it's the first step in getting better. :wink:

Sorry no picks , wife has the camera today. I was shooting offhand at paperplates at 25 yards. With either gun I would hit the target only twice when shooting 3 shot strings.

I am definitly having problems with the bigger grips on the adjustable sight model. My nieghbor stopped by and we took turns shooting. He shot the adjustable sight one better and I shot the fixed better than him. So I ended my range session with no resolution.

Well late today I decided to swap grip frames . I put the smaller grip frame on the adjustable sight model and went out back of the house and shot the best groups I've shot all day. I always put all 3 shot groups on the paper plate.

So now I'll give it a couple days and see if I can duplicate that shooting session. I'll take pictures at the next session. Then I'll have to figure out what configuration I'll be keeping.
User avatar
Andrew
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2043
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:30 pm
Location: Southern Missouri

Post by Andrew »

BenT wrote:...today I decided to swap grip frames. I put the smaller grip frame on the adjustable sight model....
Oooooo, that be sum bod joo-joo right there! :shock:
ImageImage
Qui tacet consentit. (silence implies consent)
The Boring Blog
BenT
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2729
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: Northern Wisconsin

Post by BenT »

OK here is the new configuration ,short grip on adj. sight frame.

Image


Here is how it shot at 25 yards off hand. 3 shot groups.

Image

Now this is the best I could do . I don't know if it is good or fair . I'm not a pistol guy. But I do know the smaller grip fits my hand better. So those who shoot pistols let me know if this is acceptable for this pistol.

I know I use the expensive targets. In fact I caught the wife trying to use them to feed the kids with. Any way this little test has been alot of fun , but like I said I can't keep both. In fact I was informed the money I used to buy the second pistol with was slated for a new vaccum cleaner. So I'm getting a little heat from the Chief of Staff. Otherwise I would test these guns all summer.

So the things I've learned is that the small grip fits my hand. I can shoot the adj. sights better . Better yet with the small frame. But I really don't target shoot much. I mainly want a packing pistol for in the woods and around the farm for dispatching small vermon like skunks and such. I noticed the the 6 1/2 inch barrel isn't the handiest. If it was a 5 1/2 barrel the decision would be easier. So I'm still not sure what I'm keeping yet. But I'm feeling the heat to make a choice soon!
User avatar
oldgerboy
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 250
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:39 pm
Location: New Bloomfield,PA

Post by oldgerboy »

Did you consider having a simple type sight dovetailed into the frame at the rear sort of like a stock one from a 1911 auto.

You would get a better sight picture and a bit of adjustment and it would still be easy to pack along .
BenT
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2729
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: Northern Wisconsin

Post by BenT »

Well I made up my mind and decided to keep the fixed sight model in it's original configuration. The 6 1/2 in barrel just isn't as handy to pack around. I would like to keep them both but that just isn't fesable right now.

So I try to sell it localy for $300.
arjunky
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 733
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:47 pm
Location: North Dakota

Post by arjunky »

BenT wrote:Well I made up my mind and decided to keep the fixed sight model in it's original configuration. The 6 1/2 in barrel just isn't as handy to pack around. I would like to keep them both but that just isn't fesable right now.

So I try to sell it localy for $300.
pm sent.

Byron
bogus bill
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:40 pm
Location: utah

Post by bogus bill »

Heres my short barreled ruger >32 mag.

Image
cecil
Levergunner
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:30 pm
Location: Nw Wi

Post by cecil »

BenT-sent ya personal mail, if still trying to sell local. Included my updated e-mail address.
Post Reply