Scope decision
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Scope decision
The wife of one of my buddies asked me to pick a scope for him for Father's Day. It will go on a Marlin 336. My inclination is a Leupold 1 to 5 power since it is small and he won't shoot very far.
Some people don't like the little scopes because they want a wider field of view. Another idea would be the Leupold 3 to 9 Compact.
She is OK on money so she wants a Leupold. Any other ideas for a good scope? I am thinking low mounts.
Some people don't like the little scopes because they want a wider field of view. Another idea would be the Leupold 3 to 9 Compact.
She is OK on money so she wants a Leupold. Any other ideas for a good scope? I am thinking low mounts.
- Old Savage
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 16911
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: Scope decision
I have that scope and in my opinion you can't beat it.
Re: Scope decision
You are right in looking at a low powered scope for that rifle. The lower power wil give you the field of view, the only thing you give up with the 20mm bell is light gathering in the early morning or late eve. For that the compact scope with the 33mm bell is better. Since the rifle is a short one, a compact or smaller length scope makes sense.
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:08 am
- Location: Arizona headed for New Mexico
Re: Scope decision
I worked for a major scope maker for 5 years and I have a healthy dislike of variables of ANY make.
Convince yourself, take a small scale with you and weigh a variable against a fixed power.
Jumping around , changing power means that you never become comfortable with any 1 setting.
Get a small fixed power, tell your friend to spend the time & effort learning to shoot it.
Convince yourself, take a small scale with you and weigh a variable against a fixed power.
Jumping around , changing power means that you never become comfortable with any 1 setting.
Get a small fixed power, tell your friend to spend the time & effort learning to shoot it.
- O.S.O.K.
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 5533
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:15 pm
- Location: Deep in the Piney Woods of Mississippi
Re: Scope decision
The Leupold is the perfect choice - IMHO. Encourage her to get Leupold bases and rings too - extra low.

ETA: this is my .356 Win converted M336C.
ETA: this is my .356 Win converted M336C.
Last edited by O.S.O.K. on Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
NRA Endowment Life
Phi Kappa Sigma, Alpha Phi 83 "Skulls"
OCS, 120th MP Battalion, MSSG
MOLON LABE!
Phi Kappa Sigma, Alpha Phi 83 "Skulls"
OCS, 120th MP Battalion, MSSG
MOLON LABE!
-
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 12:46 pm
- Location: Ft Hood , Tx area
Re: Scope decision
All my hunting guns wear a fixed 4 power , when I look in scope at game my brain automatically adjust for yardage . Only my varmint guns get variable like a 4x12x40AO .




Re: Scope decision
It would be hard to go wrong with a Leupold.
I've have a Leupold 3-9 on my bolt action rifle. One advantage to a variable is I can set it to the power best suited to my eyes and preferences, sight it in and then I leave it there. Right now, it's set at 4X but that may change in the future, A disadvantage is that a variable has more lenses to get knocked loose in an accident.
I've have a Leupold 3-9 on my bolt action rifle. One advantage to a variable is I can set it to the power best suited to my eyes and preferences, sight it in and then I leave it there. Right now, it's set at 4X but that may change in the future, A disadvantage is that a variable has more lenses to get knocked loose in an accident.
What most people call a "right" is the equivalent of a dog walking on a leash. Just because your leash is a little longer than the other dogs' does not mean you don't have a master.
Re: Scope decision
I'd choose the VX-II 2-7 x 28 Ultralight. It's the lowest power/largest objective/shortest/lightest scope I see on their website. I have the older Vari-X compact AO in 2-7x28 and it gives good low-light visibility. I can't see well in low light through the 20 mm objectives.
Kind regards,
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
Re: Scope decision
Tycer wrote:I'd choose the VX-II 2-7 x 28 Ultralight. It's the lowest power/largest objective/shortest/lightest scope I see on their website. I have the older Vari-X compact AO in 2-7x28 and it gives good low-light visibility. I can't see well in low light through the 20 mm objectives.
+1
NRA Life Member
Re: Scope decision
I like that approach...!tn gun runner wrote:All my hunting guns wear a fixed 4 power , when I look in scope at game my brain automatically adjust for yardage . Only my varmint guns get variable like a 4x12x40AO .
It's 2025 - "Cutesy Time is OVER....!" [Dan Bongino]
- Old Savage
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 16911
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: Scope decision
Not much adjusting to do in range at 30-30 ranges. The 1.5-5x is the one I had in mind on my previous post. Gives the advantage of a wider field if you want it. Mine has riden my 7-08 for almost 1000 rds and has been completely dependable.
Re: Scope decision
Tycer wrote:I'd choose the VX-II 2-7 x 28 Ultralight. It's the lowest power/largest objective/shortest/lightest scope I see on their website. I have the older Vari-X compact AO in 2-7x28 and it gives good low-light visibility. I can't see well in low light through the 20 mm objectives.
+1
This is really an underrated little scope. It has great eye relief and field of view at 2X and is very light and compact. If you set it up in Warne two piece bases and Weaver low rings, you will have about the lowest possible setup.
- Andrew
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 2043
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:30 pm
- Location: Southern Missouri
Re: Scope decision
The more I read/learn about scopes the more I am sure that your advice is very good. I always think back to the Mossin's with their low powered fixed scopes. 500 meters = DRT.mescalero1 wrote:I worked for a major scope maker for 5 years and I have a healthy dislike of variables of ANY make.
Convince yourself, take a small scale with you and weigh a variable against a fixed power.
Jumping around , changing power means that you never become comfortable with any 1 setting.
Get a small fixed power, tell your friend to spend the time & effort learning to shoot it.

-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 6747
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:30 am
- Location: Lower Central NYS
Re: Scope decision
Got Leupolds on most of my scoped guns along with my spotting scope being a fixed 30X 60mm Gold Ring,but I have to say the last scope I put on was a Burris 4X Short Mag(unreal clarity)
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:08 am
- Location: Arizona headed for New Mexico
Re: Scope decision
Andrew,
Every make of variable, no matter what brand name is on them suffers from the complexity if internal mechanism to make the " power " change be available, excessive mechanism makes for excessive weight.
It also incurs wear and repeatability problems, it is good that the mass of shooters are really not very good shooters or they would be seeing the POI changes in thier rifle/ scope combos during this power changing " tomfoolery " ( here come the catcalls & and offers to shoot against me )
It is all bovine scatology!
1) Get a quality fixed power
2) get plenty of the load you intend to shoot
3) spend the money you saved on the variable on a good laser rangefinder
4) sit down at the bench and learn how to shoot your rig
Every make of variable, no matter what brand name is on them suffers from the complexity if internal mechanism to make the " power " change be available, excessive mechanism makes for excessive weight.
It also incurs wear and repeatability problems, it is good that the mass of shooters are really not very good shooters or they would be seeing the POI changes in thier rifle/ scope combos during this power changing " tomfoolery " ( here come the catcalls & and offers to shoot against me )
It is all bovine scatology!
1) Get a quality fixed power
2) get plenty of the load you intend to shoot
3) spend the money you saved on the variable on a good laser rangefinder
4) sit down at the bench and learn how to shoot your rig
Re: Scope decision
I agree with all four.mescalero1 wrote:Andrew,
Every make of variable, no matter what brand name is on them suffers from the complexity if internal mechanism to make the " power " change be available, excessive mechanism makes for excessive weight.
It also incurs wear and repeatability problems, it is good that the mass of shooters are really not very good shooters or they would be seeing the POI changes in thier rifle/ scope combos during this power changing " tomfoolery " ( here come the catcalls & and offers to shoot against me )
It is all bovine scatology!
1) Get a quality fixed power
2) get plenty of the load you intend to shoot
3) spend the money you saved on the variable on a good laser rangefinder
4) sit down at the bench and learn how to shoot your rig
However, with Leupold you are stuck with the 4x scope magnification in their fixed, which IMO is too much for that gun. A fixed 2x or even better a 1.5x with a 32 objective would be ideal for me. A 4x used to be the long range sniper scope. 1.5x on a moving animal is way easier than a 4x for me. Additionally the FOV on a 4x is pretty small in comparison.
I had the same dilemma with my close-range guns. I chose the low power variable and keep them fixed just off their lowest settings. It seems when you go all the way high or low, edge distortion exists, even on the really spendy ones.
Kind regards,
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
Re: Scope decision
Some good advice. I will throw my 2 cents in I guess. I love the scope you are thinking of, but a better one for light gathering is the 1.75x6 which I have on my BLR. It is the same price as the 1.5x5 too. You cannot go wrong with either one really.
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:08 am
- Location: Arizona headed for New Mexico
Re: Scope decision
Tycer,
You are right and the American makers 25 years ago all had a variety of low power fixed scopes.
Now the marketing people control the engineneering groups and no real shooters are represented in the planning groups .
The result, expensive, ill suited to the purpose, loaded up, weighted up, unusable junk.
The newer shooters do not know it was not always so.
This is what impresses me about Andrew, this is not the first time he has shown that he is willing to look to the past for lessons learned.
You are right and the American makers 25 years ago all had a variety of low power fixed scopes.
Now the marketing people control the engineneering groups and no real shooters are represented in the planning groups .
The result, expensive, ill suited to the purpose, loaded up, weighted up, unusable junk.
The newer shooters do not know it was not always so.
This is what impresses me about Andrew, this is not the first time he has shown that he is willing to look to the past for lessons learned.
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 6972
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:52 pm
- Location: Ridgefield WA. USA
Re: Scope decision
I have several variables and a bunch of fixed power scopes. Only once ( 30 years ago) did I have a problem with one (a Leupold 3x9) and they fixed it for free in short order.


- O.S.O.K.
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 5533
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:15 pm
- Location: Deep in the Piney Woods of Mississippi
Re: Scope decision
I am going to jump in to defend the low-upper range variable scope.
Most of the time, my scope will stay on 4 or 5x. But there are times when being able to dial the scope down to 1 or 2x is desired - like if you want to hunt in thick brush or you go from open areas to thickly wooded areas where shots are going to be 50 yards or less - its really good to be able to put the scope on 1x and get the super wide field of view.
Most of the time, my scope will stay on 4 or 5x. But there are times when being able to dial the scope down to 1 or 2x is desired - like if you want to hunt in thick brush or you go from open areas to thickly wooded areas where shots are going to be 50 yards or less - its really good to be able to put the scope on 1x and get the super wide field of view.
NRA Endowment Life
Phi Kappa Sigma, Alpha Phi 83 "Skulls"
OCS, 120th MP Battalion, MSSG
MOLON LABE!
Phi Kappa Sigma, Alpha Phi 83 "Skulls"
OCS, 120th MP Battalion, MSSG
MOLON LABE!
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 6972
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:52 pm
- Location: Ridgefield WA. USA
Re: Scope decision
What O.S.O.K. said + 1




Re: Scope decision
Amen!mescalero1 wrote:Tycer,
You are right and the American makers 25 years ago all had a variety of low power fixed scopes.
Now the marketing people control the engineneering groups and no real shooters are represented in the planning groups .
The result, expensive, ill suited to the purpose, loaded up, weighted up, unusable junk.
The newer shooters do not know it was not always so.
This is what impresses me about Andrew, this is not the first time he has shown that he is willing to look to the past for lessons learned.
Kind regards,
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
-
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 12:46 pm
- Location: Ft Hood , Tx area
Re: Scope decision
I shoot and sight in my hunting guns in the way I shoot them in the field . I have a 12x12 inch steel target which is the size of a deer kill zone set out at 300 yds . I have never miss it shooting off cross sticks and this 4 power scope is perfect for deer at 50 to 400 yds . This gun has never been shot on a bench . I've shot 5 shot groups under 1 inch on cross sticks at 100 yds many times with the 4 power scope .......


Last edited by TX Gun Runner on Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.




-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:08 am
- Location: Arizona headed for New Mexico
Re: Scope decision
That is what I am talking about, learn to shoot your rig, the way you shoot.
Is that a K-4 Micro -Trac?
Is that a K-4 Micro -Trac?
-
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 12:46 pm
- Location: Ft Hood , Tx area
Re: Scope decision
NO ..... I got that scope for a buddy and it is clearer and brighter then my K-4 micro wide angle and he want my scope more then this one so we traded . Here my other hunting gun that has killed over 100 jacks which all were shot 75 to 150 yds . It has a Bushnell 4 power 22 scope with a 1" tube .mescalero1 wrote:That is what I am talking about, learn to shoot your rig, the way you shoot.
Is that a K-4 Micro -Trac?





-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:08 am
- Location: Arizona headed for New Mexico
Re: Scope decision
Fixed power rules!
Re: Scope decision
my woods hunting rifles that wear scopes, all have Leupold 2-7x on them. I feel it is the perfect combo of power and usefulness...
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid" - Han Solo, Star Wars...
-
- Levergunner 3.0
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 5:09 pm
- Location: RHODE ISLAND
Re: Scope decision
My vote is for a 2.5x Leupold. Small, light, and rugged. Doesn't look TOO out of place on a lever.....
. My $.02. Thanks, Tom


War sees no color, sex, or ethnic background - wars only see blood shed by our heroes for our freedoms.
I Am An American! Fighting for our Country and our way of life.
Fourth Generation Veteran and Proud !!
I Am An American! Fighting for our Country and our way of life.
Fourth Generation Veteran and Proud !!
-
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 12:46 pm
- Location: Ft Hood , Tx area
Re: Scope decision
If you need 2X scope , you should have been shooting iron sight so anything under 4X is a waste . If you can't hit a deer at 400 yds , a squirrel at 100 yds and a rabbit at 200 yds with a 4X scope adding a 24X won't make you a better shooter . Only target , varmint and over 400 yds hunting need more that 4X . My target and match guns wear 6x/18x , 16x and a 24x . Anything under 100 yds this the sight you need . I put 5 Tn deer down with my SASS/CAS gun ,50 yds to 125 yds and I put 3 out of 3 shots in one running at 75 yds , so all that SASS/CAS shooting that I do helps .






Re: Scope decision
I also have a Trijicon 1.25-4 Accupoint I've never mounted. They have a new 1-4x24 30mm straight tube that looks to be good.
Kind regards,
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
Re: Scope decision
Leupold 3x, frequently on ebay,saw one there over weekend,perfect for leverguns in my old guy opinion.
Re: Scope decision
tn gun runner wrote:If you need 2X scope , you should have been shooting iron sight so anything under 4X is a waste . If you can't hit a deer at 400 yds , a squirrel at 100 yds and a rabbit at 200 yds with a 4X scope adding a 24X won't make you a better shooter . Only target , varmint and over 400 yds hunting need more that 4X . My target and match guns wear 6x/18x , 16x and a 24x . Anything under 100 yds this the sight you need . I put 5 Tn deer down with my SASS/CAS gun ,50 yds to 125 yds and I put 3 out of 3 shots in one running at 75 yds , so all that SASS/CAS shooting that I do helps .
I will have to disagree with you somewhat on this point. A 2X scope can be greatly superior to any open sights at dusk and dawn in the thick woods. In open country, I would agree with you.
- El Chivo
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 3659
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:12 pm
- Location: Red River Gorge Area
Re: Scope decision
They discontinued the Weaver 2.5x fixed, but there was only about an ounce of weight difference between it and the variable. And the fixed was longer. The 4x38 version is only 1.1 ounces lighter than the 2-10 38, but the 2.5-7x32 is actually lighter than the fixed 4x38.
Durability might be an issue but if the market is going to variables, it's probably for a reason.
Durability might be an issue but if the market is going to variables, it's probably for a reason.
"I'll tell you what living is. You get up when you feel like it. You fry yourself some eggs. You see what kind of a day it is."
-
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 12:46 pm
- Location: Ft Hood , Tx area
Re: Scope decision
You have never shot a tang sight with a gold or white bead . All you do is look thought hole and NO NEED to line anything up and just put the front bead on the target and pull the trigger . This is the view you get with a tang sight . Take a black piece paper and punch a hole in it with a ball point pen 5/32 and hold it 2 inches from your eye or tape it to your glasses and then pickup rifle and look at the front sight you will see why hitting a running deer is possible . I had a 1.5X 4.5 on my 375HH and I had trouble with a walking target at 1.5 X . The biggest problem people with a peep is they use too small of a hole . I made this sight . And when I hunt I use a lot larger hole then in pic . I hope this help someone .TNBigBore wrote: I will have to disagree with you somewhat on this point. A 2X scope can be greatly superior to any open sights at dusk and dawn in the thick woods. In open country, I would agree with you.






-
- Senior Levergunner
- Posts: 1581
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:59 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scope decision
A four or six power scope would be perfect for this rifle. More magnification will only encourage him to shoot farther than he should, and miss close up opportunities.
Hunter Ed. instructor
NRA Basic pistol Inst.
NRA Personal protection inst.
NRA Range safety officer
Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. Psalm 1
NRA Basic pistol Inst.
NRA Personal protection inst.
NRA Range safety officer
Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. Psalm 1
Re: Scope decision
Hmm,
We're not blessed with the options you blokes have, Sydney Aus.
Anyway, have ordered a Burris 2-7x35 Fullfield 11, for my 45-70, have used one before, great scope.
Had a look through a Leupold 2-7, the Burris suits my eyes better.
The Burris is to replace a Bushnell 1.5-4.5x32, maybe me but I have no confidence in this sample of their production.
Have the same scope on a Marlin 30-30, great!.
However, would just as soon have a fixed 4x, not all that easy down here, variables rule the market place.
Cheers
Mark
We're not blessed with the options you blokes have, Sydney Aus.
Anyway, have ordered a Burris 2-7x35 Fullfield 11, for my 45-70, have used one before, great scope.
Had a look through a Leupold 2-7, the Burris suits my eyes better.
The Burris is to replace a Bushnell 1.5-4.5x32, maybe me but I have no confidence in this sample of their production.
Have the same scope on a Marlin 30-30, great!.
However, would just as soon have a fixed 4x, not all that easy down here, variables rule the market place.
Cheers
Mark
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:08 am
- Location: Arizona headed for New Mexico
Re: Scope decision
They do here as well, if you want a good fixed, you have to haunt the purveyers, and find a good old one.
-
- Senior Levergunner
- Posts: 1581
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:59 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scope decision
I have, and recommend the Lyman All-American. darn good scope, no longer made. The Alaskan is even better, I think. Really solid vintage, fixed power scope. I see them on E-bay, from time to time.
Hunter Ed. instructor
NRA Basic pistol Inst.
NRA Personal protection inst.
NRA Range safety officer
Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. Psalm 1
NRA Basic pistol Inst.
NRA Personal protection inst.
NRA Range safety officer
Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. Psalm 1
- Old Savage
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 16911
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: Scope decision
To compare on the Model 7 1.5-5x, this one is not afraid of benches. Best group so small I am not going to mention it.


- Old Savage
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 16911
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: Scope decision
4x Leupold, the old kind,
1.75-6x Leupold
Weaver 2.5
Leupold 4x Compact.

1.75-6x Leupold
Weaver 2.5
Leupold 4x Compact.

- Old Savage
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 16911
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: Scope decision
Leupold 2.5x,


- Old Savage
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 16911
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: Scope decision
Weaver Steel Lite II 2.5x
Leupold 3x

Leupold 3x

-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:08 am
- Location: Arizona headed for New Mexico
Re: Scope decision
Nice
-
- Senior Levergunner
- Posts: 1581
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:59 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scope decision
There's a Weaver K4 on this site for sale. I don't really need it, but would like to have it in case I find a gun that needs it in the future. Hope the guy wants a trade.
Hunter Ed. instructor
NRA Basic pistol Inst.
NRA Personal protection inst.
NRA Range safety officer
Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. Psalm 1
NRA Basic pistol Inst.
NRA Personal protection inst.
NRA Range safety officer
Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. Psalm 1