38/44 loads in the rossi 92
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
38/44 loads in the rossi 92
Is the rossi 92 Action strong enough
for 38/44 loads. They are a little lower
Than 357 loads. I want to use it for deer
hunting. Thanks..
for 38/44 loads. They are a little lower
Than 357 loads. I want to use it for deer
hunting. Thanks..
- COSteve
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4081
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:03 pm
- Location: A little valley up in the Rockies
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
The Rossi 92 is chambered in 454 Casull, a 50,000 CUP peak pressure round, so yes, the Rossi can take a 38/44 at 1/2 the pressure.
Steve
Retired and Living the Good Life
No Matter Where You Go, There You Are
Retired and Living the Good Life
No Matter Where You Go, There You Are
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
I believe any 357 magnum can take 38/44 loads, but few 38 specials can
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
.
I'm not a gunsmith, but I'd be confident in the Rossi 92 strength vs a 38/44 'chambered' (maybe a better word would be 'rated') - which I think would include a '357 Mag' and even a '38 Special' marked rifle barrel.
I thought they did make some of the hyphenated cartridges too, like 38-40 and 44-40, which would be cool...would LOVE a 32-20...
But like others have said, the action holds up to larger, higher-pressure rounds (the 454 is engineered slightly differently I believe, but the 44 Mag and 357 Mag are high pressure and require large holes in the front of the receiver (where the Marlins seem to fail when hot-rodded), and do fine. Not sure the pressure of either of the 38/44's I've heard of, but the 'common' one as I understand it was essentially a 38 Special +P for the S&W 'Heavy Duty model 20' and 'Outdoorsman model 23' that were 44 Mag Triple-lock framed 38 caliber revolvers, and the other was an obsolete cartridge unique to the S&W Model No. 3, 38-44, but along the same premise - a larger-than-normal frame to facilitate a 'magnum' load before that terminology came into being.
So I can't imagine either stressing a modern lever action 92 clone with a 1930's revolver cartridge that is equal or lesser diameter than a 357 Magnum and of lesser pressure.
I'm not a gunsmith, but I'd be confident in the Rossi 92 strength vs a 38/44 'chambered' (maybe a better word would be 'rated') - which I think would include a '357 Mag' and even a '38 Special' marked rifle barrel.
I thought they did make some of the hyphenated cartridges too, like 38-40 and 44-40, which would be cool...would LOVE a 32-20...
But like others have said, the action holds up to larger, higher-pressure rounds (the 454 is engineered slightly differently I believe, but the 44 Mag and 357 Mag are high pressure and require large holes in the front of the receiver (where the Marlins seem to fail when hot-rodded), and do fine. Not sure the pressure of either of the 38/44's I've heard of, but the 'common' one as I understand it was essentially a 38 Special +P for the S&W 'Heavy Duty model 20' and 'Outdoorsman model 23' that were 44 Mag Triple-lock framed 38 caliber revolvers, and the other was an obsolete cartridge unique to the S&W Model No. 3, 38-44, but along the same premise - a larger-than-normal frame to facilitate a 'magnum' load before that terminology came into being.
So I can't imagine either stressing a modern lever action 92 clone with a 1930's revolver cartridge that is equal or lesser diameter than a 357 Magnum and of lesser pressure.
It's 2025 - "Cutesy Time is OVER....!" [Dan Bongino]
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
Yes, of course. Pressures in the 38/44 appear to have been no more than modern 357 pressure levels, in the low to mid 30s. There still exist 357 data (CUP) in the 40s.
Sharpe's book from the era lists 38/44 level loads at only 21,000, but I think that was a lab error. QuickLoad estimates around 26,000.
Why not just shoot 357 in your Rossi? Do you have an old 38/44 revolver and wish to use the same ammo in both?
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
I just enjoy the 38/44 so much. It's a real pleasure to shoot out of my s&w 686. Accurate at 50 yards the farthest I have tried. I appreciate your reply. I will be loading up a few 358156 and 358429.. johnny. If it warms up some.
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
I've tried a few loads in my Rossi 92.
The 38-44 with 170 gr 358429 cast bullets.
12 gr of 2400. About 1500 fps. Accuracy at 50 yards is close to 3 inches.
I think this will be a great deer load at 50 to maybe 70 yards. Any thoughts on this??
The 38-44 with 170 gr 358429 cast bullets.
12 gr of 2400. About 1500 fps. Accuracy at 50 yards is close to 3 inches.
I think this will be a great deer load at 50 to maybe 70 yards. Any thoughts on this??
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
sounds like a good deer load to me. it has more to do with the bullet technology than the ballistics
can you post a photo of your load with a 357 mag load for comparison?
first time I've ever heard of the 38-44. thanks
grizz
- Scott Tschirhart
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 5057
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
Yes, I really like 170 gr Keith bullets over 11 gr of 2400 and it will shoot well in many .357s.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Scott Tschirhart
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 5057
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
I never had put this 11 gr load across the chronograph until today.
S&W 640 2 inch barrel averages 1021
Ruger Flattop 4 5/8 inch averages 1187
20 inch Marlin 94 averages 1458
S&W 640 2 inch barrel averages 1021
Ruger Flattop 4 5/8 inch averages 1187
20 inch Marlin 94 averages 1458
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
That's the same bullet I use. ? 358429 ??
- Scott Tschirhart
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 5057
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
It’s very close. This is a Rim Rock 170 gr bullet.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
Oh yeah. So you like them pretty good..thanks.. Johnny
- Scott Tschirhart
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 5057
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
Yes, these are really well made. Cranking them up to .38/44 velocity puts them into a very useful power range.
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
What load are you using for your 38-44
If you don't mind me asking.. thanks,johnny
If you don't mind me asking.. thanks,johnny
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
The 358429 will likely bee too long in 357 cases but may be fine in 38 spl cases. Check before loading a bunch if intended primarily for the carbine.
The Browning 92 wont feed the 429421 Lyman bullet in magnum cases without work on the carrier and other details, but feeds fine in 44 spl cases.
The Browning 92 wont feed the 429421 Lyman bullet in magnum cases without work on the carrier and other details, but feeds fine in 44 spl cases.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-
Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
- Scott Tschirhart
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 5057
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:56 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
Re: 38/44 loads in the rossi 92
Same as I use. Works great.. johnny