Do any you guys have experience with the H&R buffalo Classic 45-70 rifle? It looks like cheap fun but could be the most brutal thing I've ever owned. I have no idea.
Mack
H&R 1871 Buffalo Classic
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
-
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:49 am
- Location: Central Illinois
-
- Senior Levergunner
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 6:31 pm
- Location: Arizona Territory
Re: H&R 1871 Buffalo Classic
Some Buffs are very accurate. This piece is very popular with Long range CASS/SASS shooters.
I own one in 38-55.
I own one in 38-55.
SASS# 51223
Arizona Cowboy Shooter's Assoc.
Cowtown Cowboy Shooter's Assoc.
Uberti 73/44-40 carbine, Rossi 92/44-40,
Marlin 94CB/44 24" Limited, Winchester 94/30-30
Arizona Cowboy Shooter's Assoc.
Cowtown Cowboy Shooter's Assoc.
Uberti 73/44-40 carbine, Rossi 92/44-40,
Marlin 94CB/44 24" Limited, Winchester 94/30-30
Re: H&R 1871 Buffalo Classic
.
I bought one when they were first introduced - as the Wesson & Richardson 1871 Buffalo Classic - when they were issued w/o sights.
It was a very attractive rifle, with very nice case colors & checkered walnut stocks.
I mounted a Lyman globe front sight up front, with a Williams WGRS peep sight in the D/T'd holes atop the rear end of the bbl.
I found the 32" bbl a bit long for expediant hunting ( aka: akward handling); yet a bit light for heavy .45-70 loads.
I found the recoil acceptable, as long as I kept boolit weight to 300-350grains - but will heartily suggest adding some weight in the stock, under the buttplate, if you want to shoot heavy boolits & @ long range.
In the end, since I'm not a long-range type of guy, I sold off the .45-70 bbl, and mounted a 20ga rifled bbl from a NEF Pardner II (Tracker ?), and had a nice-looking slug gun for deer. (I sold the NEF receiver & stocks to a funshow parts vendor to defray my overall cost).
.
I bought one when they were first introduced - as the Wesson & Richardson 1871 Buffalo Classic - when they were issued w/o sights.
It was a very attractive rifle, with very nice case colors & checkered walnut stocks.
I mounted a Lyman globe front sight up front, with a Williams WGRS peep sight in the D/T'd holes atop the rear end of the bbl.
I found the 32" bbl a bit long for expediant hunting ( aka: akward handling); yet a bit light for heavy .45-70 loads.
I found the recoil acceptable, as long as I kept boolit weight to 300-350grains - but will heartily suggest adding some weight in the stock, under the buttplate, if you want to shoot heavy boolits & @ long range.
In the end, since I'm not a long-range type of guy, I sold off the .45-70 bbl, and mounted a 20ga rifled bbl from a NEF Pardner II (Tracker ?), and had a nice-looking slug gun for deer. (I sold the NEF receiver & stocks to a funshow parts vendor to defray my overall cost).
.
Re: H&R 1871 Buffalo Classic
Take a look here http://www.go2gbo.com/forums/hr-centerfire-rifles/
Everything you wanted to know about H&Rs. For the money they are actually fine guns. Strong enough that some have reamed them out to .45-120.
Don't get started with them unless you are strong. They grow on you like a sickness.
Everything you wanted to know about H&Rs. For the money they are actually fine guns. Strong enough that some have reamed them out to .45-120.
Don't get started with them unless you are strong. They grow on you like a sickness.
If you're gonna be stupid ya gotta be tough-
Isiah 55:8&9
It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled.
Isiah 55:8&9
It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled.
Re: H&R 1871 Buffalo Classic
I have one and shoot my stock standard 525gr load in it. Doesn't kick much for me. My son shoots it fine and he weighs about half what I do. I did add some round balls to the cavernous butt stock socket hole.msmith1228 wrote:Do any you guys have experience with the H&R buffalo Classic 45-70 rifle? It looks like cheap fun but could be the most brutal thing I've ever owned. I have no idea.
Mack
It's a fun gun.
Grizz
PS I think Blaine shot it, maybe he can chime in.
- ollogger
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 2826
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:47 pm
- Location: Wheatland Wyoming
- Contact:
Re: H&R 1871 Buffalo Classic
I had one in 45-70 & liked it, I also shot the heck out of it, with a heavy bullet & lots of
powder it did recoil pretty well, I sold it to a guy who shoots black powder & round balls
& he loves the gun
ollogger
powder it did recoil pretty well, I sold it to a guy who shoots black powder & round balls
& he loves the gun
ollogger
Re: H&R 1871 Buffalo Classic
Strangely enough, The Grizz 525 didn't kick all that bad in anything I shot it out of. Including my 10" BFR....(man, I wish I had that back )Grizz wrote:I have one and shoot my stock standard 525gr load in it. Doesn't kick much for me. My son shoots it fine and he weighs about half what I do. I did add some round balls to the cavernous butt stock socket hole.msmith1228 wrote:Do any you guys have experience with the H&R buffalo Classic 45-70 rifle? It looks like cheap fun but could be the most brutal thing I've ever owned. I have no idea.
Mack
It's a fun gun.
Grizz
PS I think Blaine shot it, maybe he can chime in.
The Rotten Fruit Always Hits The Ground First
Proud Life Member Of:
NRA
Second Amendment Foundation
Citizens Committee For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
DAV
Proud Life Member Of:
NRA
Second Amendment Foundation
Citizens Committee For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
DAV
-
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:49 am
- Location: Central Illinois
Re: H&R 1871 Buffalo Classic
Hey guys, thanks for the info and advice. I think I'll order one next month.
Mack
Mack