Ladies & gents,
What a reaction!

Controversy abounds!
I find it interesting that the looks of the Golden Boy is very, very loosely based on 1860 Henry & more closely on the 1866 Winchester, and Uberti appears to copy the Golden Boy. I know that Uberti already produces an 1860 Henry replica, and some .22LR versions of the 1866 & 1873 Winchesters. I realize that the guts of the Uberti "silver" rifle may be totally different from those of the Golden Boy, and that the basic guts of the Golden Boy are very similar to those of the modern Henry H001-series, which, in turn, descends from the original Erma levergun of 1972-1973. Truthfully, I do not have a hankering for either of those gold/ silver rifles, but they do serve a purpose.
Now, I am having trouble finding the link to a quote about Henry's Golden Boy's receiver cover treatment. In a nutshell, though, the cover is designed to be coated, with clearence allowed for the thickness of the plating & tinting they do to it. Henry Wisconsin, a metals casting & extruding company, plates the receiver of the Golden Boy with
nickel, then covers that with a
golden-tinted clear finish. I know that this clear finish can be scratched, but I have wondered what the Golden Boy would like like with all of the tint removed. I also wonder how durable the nickel plating is.
Uberti says that their new, silver gun has an aluminum reciever, nothing more. As for the alloy of Henry's receiver covers goes, Andy Wickstrom, of Henry Wisconsin, says this about it:
http://www.rimfirecentral.com/forums/sh ... t=387405#6
"
This is not your standard variety Zamak and I would suggest buying a replacement cover or two, if you'd like to experiment on your own. Otherwise, Henry has some options for replacement."
For the record, I have a Henry H001L, "Lever Carbine", and I would not get rid of it for anything.
Shawn