Marlin 1889... They fixed what were broke!

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
rusty gunns
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:12 pm

Marlin 1889... They fixed what were broke!

Post by rusty gunns »

I have two Marlin 1889's. One in 38-40 made in 1890, the other in 44-40 made, I believe in 1899. Both suffer from the same mallity.

When you load the magazine, the first round often starts out of the tube, comes three quarters of the way out and jams, tail up at about a 30 degree angle locking the action up tight.

The only fix is to remove the lever and pull back the bolt, and the round can be dropped out.

If you load the first round through the ejection port, you can fire all the rounds in the tube without a jam. This was driving me crazy.

I Googled 1889 marlin jam, and this appears to be a common problem. (Which is why I'm sharing this.)

I thought of getting parts from Numrich, But the parts they get are from pieced out guns, so who is to say, the carrier I get is any better than the one I have.

On a lark, I went to Marlins page and checked repairs. They use private contractors for the old guns.
To make a long post short, I called Williams Gunsight (from Marlin's page). After a short conversation, I sent the gun.

In about two weeks, it was fixed. I was sure fixing a 120 year old gun was a Krap shoot. That any parts would be impossible to find. But she is fixed now and I have my "Red Headed Step Child" back.

So if any of you have an 89 with that problem, you may want to give them a call. Beats taking a bath on Gunbroker selling a gun you'd really like to keep.
The problem using historical quotes in your signature is that there is no way to verify its authenticity.
-Abraham Lincoln

Pair of Colt 73 44-40 (1897)
Parker Bros 10 Gauge (1878)
Winchester 73 44-40 (1881)
Marlin 89 38-40 (1891) Marlin 89 44-40 (1891)
Win 92 38-40 (1892)
Win 92 Short Rifle 44-40 (1901)
User avatar
KirkD
Desktop Artiste
Posts: 4406
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 6:52 am
Location: Central Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Marlin 1889... They fixed what were broke!

Post by KirkD »

Thank you for that info. Valuable. I have an upcoming opportunity to purchase an original Marlin 1889 deluxe in 44-40. If it has that problem, I'll know what to do now. thanks.
Kirk: An old geezer who loves the smell of freshly turned earth, old cedar rail fences, wood smoke, a crackling fireplace on a snowy evening, pristine wilderness lakes, the scent of
cedars and a magnificent Whitetail buck framed in the semi-buckhorn sights of a 120-year old Winchester.
Blog: https://www.kirkdurston.com/
User avatar
rusty gunns
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:12 pm

Re: Marlin 1889... They fixed what were broke!

Post by rusty gunns »

KirkD wrote:Thank you for that info. Valuable. I have an upcoming opportunity to purchase an original Marlin 1889 deluxe in 44-40. If it has that problem, I'll know what to do now. thanks.

Good, glad I could give some sound input.

The gunsmith did mention how ever that if he could not have gotten the tang screw out, it could have gotten complicated, so that is something to be aware of.
Other than that all he had to do was clean it out, tighten a few parts and replace one screw.
The problem using historical quotes in your signature is that there is no way to verify its authenticity.
-Abraham Lincoln

Pair of Colt 73 44-40 (1897)
Parker Bros 10 Gauge (1878)
Winchester 73 44-40 (1881)
Marlin 89 38-40 (1891) Marlin 89 44-40 (1891)
Win 92 38-40 (1892)
Win 92 Short Rifle 44-40 (1901)
Post Reply