Forcing cone erosion from Lilgun?
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Forcing cone erosion from Lilgun?
I dont remember who, but someone mentioned that Lilgun is purported to cause erosion in a forcing cone...
Anyone know about this?
Is this just in hot loads?
Heavier bullets?
I like me some Lilgun, wouldn't want to erode a throat though.
Anyone know about this?
Is this just in hot loads?
Heavier bullets?
I like me some Lilgun, wouldn't want to erode a throat though.
Jeff Quinn mentioned that.
I've heard it mentioned regarding several powders including H110/W296. True or not? Don't know. Frankly, I'm willing to keep using it and see if I have a big problem. To be noticeably different it would have to burn hotter in that portion of the bore than other powders to provide a noticeable difference. Perhaps the idea that it does do this is supported by the different pressure curve this slow burning ball powder has when compared to one of the nearest powders in application and burn rate, H110/W296.
As I said, it makes no never mind to me. I'd like to shoot enough to use up a barrel in any gun I have. I don't think it will happen.
I've heard it mentioned regarding several powders including H110/W296. True or not? Don't know. Frankly, I'm willing to keep using it and see if I have a big problem. To be noticeably different it would have to burn hotter in that portion of the bore than other powders to provide a noticeable difference. Perhaps the idea that it does do this is supported by the different pressure curve this slow burning ball powder has when compared to one of the nearest powders in application and burn rate, H110/W296.
As I said, it makes no never mind to me. I'd like to shoot enough to use up a barrel in any gun I have. I don't think it will happen.

Sincerely,
Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
+1Hobie wrote: I'd like to shoot enough to use up a barrel in any gun I have. I don't think it will happen.
Kind regards,
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
Here is something that is interesting about Lil' Gun that was posted on greybeards.
http://www.go2gbo.com/forums/index.php/ ... ng so hot.
http://www.go2gbo.com/forums/index.php/ ... ng so hot.
Ricky
DWWC
DWWC
I think it has allot to do with the type of rounds your loading.
If your loading lightweights trying to see how fast you can push them, I think you can expect forcing cone erosion and a little top strap cutting.
If your loading lightweights trying to see how fast you can push them, I think you can expect forcing cone erosion and a little top strap cutting.
ScottS

"No arsenal, no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women."
-- Ronald Reagan

"No arsenal, no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women."
-- Ronald Reagan
I have to wonder how fast he was shooting. L'ilGun burning noticeably hotter than H110 is NOT my experience.RKrodle wrote:Here is something that is interesting about Lil' Gun that was posted on greybeards.
http://www.go2gbo.com/forums/index.php/ ... o hot[/b].
The emphasis in the above quote is mine. I don't know Mr. Baker, so I can't judge the source. I just don't feel such anecdotal evidence is reliable
Last edited by Hobie on Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sincerely,
Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
- J Miller
- Member Emeritus
- Posts: 14903
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm
- Location: Not in IL no more ... :)
Hobie, don't fret. If you try hard enough you can do it. I burned the forcing cone out of my Mdl 28 in less than 6K rounds. It got to spitting so bad that I had to have the barrel set back and a new forcing cone cut.As I said, it makes no never mind to me. I'd like to shoot enough to use up a barrel in any gun I have. I don't think it will happen. Crying or Very sad
Shoots good again.
I never used H110/296 or Lil'Gun, but years ago I did use a lot of Winchester 630 ball powder. THAT stuff is what started the forcing cone erosion. From that point on it just got worse.
In the late 70s to early 80s I fried the forcing cones on another Mdl 28 and a Python with 630. The Mdl 28 I have now was the third victim. All of these were with full weight 158gr or heavier bullets. I'm not a light weight bullet fan.
Do I believe that Lil'Gun and other ball powders can cause forcing cone erosion? Absolutely.
Joe
***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts
.***

Hobie,I don't know Mr. Baker either. I have read several of his post on graybeards, he post on the freedom arms section on a semi regular basis. I don't know if this a proof load or something that he shoots at the factory or some experiment that he did. But, when the owner of Freedom Arms melts down a 83 in 50 rounds of ammo it does make you stop and think about using Lil Gun.



Ricky
DWWC
DWWC
THAT Mr. Baker?RKrodle wrote:Hobie,I don't know Mr. Baker either. I have read several of his post on graybeards, he post on the freedom arms section on a semi regular basis. I don't know if this a proof load or something that he shoots at the factory or some experiment that he did. But, when the owner of Freedom Arms melts down a 83 in 50 rounds of ammo it does make you stop and think about using Lil Gun.![]()


Sincerely,
Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
I generally shoot 50 rounds or less in a session, and have noticed the 158gr loads over Lilgun gets a little warm. NOT as hot as Mr. Baker had, but warm.
It never seemed to get too hot to handle, and would always cool enough between cylinder loading.
So heat is the issue eh?
I have a pretty accurate group using just 16.0gr of this powder, so I won't fret it.
My cone looks fine, too.
It never seemed to get too hot to handle, and would always cool enough between cylinder loading.
So heat is the issue eh?
I have a pretty accurate group using just 16.0gr of this powder, so I won't fret it.
My cone looks fine, too.
If I'm wrong please correct me ... Generally, loads using Lil Gun and 110/296 tend to be fairly top end ... that's where those powders really shine. Any loads that are at or near top end will cause heat. The amount can vary with the firing frequency. I've loaded some very vigorous top end loads with those powders but wouldn't have been able to physically sustain the 50 shots mentioned inorder to maintain heat like was mentioned ... besides, to continue while the revolver was that hot is irresponsible unless a life threatening situation was present.
The erosion issue was a complaint about magnum rifle cartridges also. The throat and top strap cutting were also complaints focused on the Super Mag series of cartridges chambered in the Dan Wesson revolvers.
Top end loads are going to produce heat and attack metal.
Joe's experience, assuming the loads were what I understand to be typical of loads for those powders, would be acceptable to me.
Light to medium loads aren't mentioned since they don't cause the erosion in that short a number. However, given a sufficient length of time and a high enough number of shots, even loads like that will sooner or later cause deterioration to some degree. Heat and chemical compounds attack metal.
The erosion issue was a complaint about magnum rifle cartridges also. The throat and top strap cutting were also complaints focused on the Super Mag series of cartridges chambered in the Dan Wesson revolvers.
Top end loads are going to produce heat and attack metal.
Joe's experience, assuming the loads were what I understand to be typical of loads for those powders, would be acceptable to me.
Light to medium loads aren't mentioned since they don't cause the erosion in that short a number. However, given a sufficient length of time and a high enough number of shots, even loads like that will sooner or later cause deterioration to some degree. Heat and chemical compounds attack metal.
Bob Baker can be trusted to speak honestly about his experiences. I have spent time with him and count him as a friend and I trust his word.
olgerboy is correct also, but let me add, shoot enough and you will wear the gun out.
Most of the time folks don't shoot enough to do that.
A .22 sixgun will eventually burn the forcing cone, develop end-shake and excessive cylinder gap. It only took me 30 years of shooting huge amounts of 22's .. but I finally accomplished it!
A trip to Bowen Classic Arms and the gun was better than new.
olgerboy is correct also, but let me add, shoot enough and you will wear the gun out.
Most of the time folks don't shoot enough to do that.
A .22 sixgun will eventually burn the forcing cone, develop end-shake and excessive cylinder gap. It only took me 30 years of shooting huge amounts of 22's .. but I finally accomplished it!

A trip to Bowen Classic Arms and the gun was better than new.
Jim,JimT wrote:Bob Baker can be trusted to speak honestly about his experiences. I have spent time with him and count him as a friend and I trust his word.
olgerboy is correct also, but let me add, shoot enough and you will wear the gun out.
Most of the time folks don't shoot enough to do that.
A .22 sixgun will eventually burn the forcing cone, develop end-shake and excessive cylinder gap. It only took me 30 years of shooting huge amounts of 22's .. but I finally accomplished it!![]()
A trip to Bowen Classic Arms and the gun was better than new.
Do you perhaps know where he might have written about his experience with L'ilGun?
BTW, how's the packing going for your trip? I see that you're already there!

Sincerely,
Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
I am not sure where he wrote about it ... but you can call him easily enough ... toll free ... 1.800.833.4432 -- tell him I sent youHobie wrote: how's the packing going for your trip? I see that you're already there!

I am there .. at least mentally. Everything is coming together in spite of me working on it.

-
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 4:52 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Before I bought my 357 Maximum Ruger I investigated the erosion/frame cutting problem and I came across a website where a guy had experimented with an old S&W. What he found was that hitting it with a blowtorch on the frame did not do much damage at all. I just heated the frame up.
But hitting it with a high pressure sand/bead blaster with ball powder ripped the metal up pretty good. His conclusion was that it is the size and shape of the unburned ball powder hitting the frame at high speeds that does the damage and not the heat per se.
My observation of my revolvers indicates that this is plausible if not probable. I experimented with H110 in 357 mag and found that 100 rounds had left a mark on the frame of my Pre-27. Shooting 4227 or 2400 or even hot Unique loads had done nothing to it previously.
So, I am quite cautious of ball or spherical powders and try to avoid using them in revolvers if I can. I also shy away from them in rifles but I am a bit more flexible here.
Just some observations and food for thought.
But hitting it with a high pressure sand/bead blaster with ball powder ripped the metal up pretty good. His conclusion was that it is the size and shape of the unburned ball powder hitting the frame at high speeds that does the damage and not the heat per se.
My observation of my revolvers indicates that this is plausible if not probable. I experimented with H110 in 357 mag and found that 100 rounds had left a mark on the frame of my Pre-27. Shooting 4227 or 2400 or even hot Unique loads had done nothing to it previously.
So, I am quite cautious of ball or spherical powders and try to avoid using them in revolvers if I can. I also shy away from them in rifles but I am a bit more flexible here.
Just some observations and food for thought.
38-55 & 38/44 What a combination!
Peter, I'm glad you added your $.02!
When I read it, a light poped on for me. I used to bead blast all sorts of stainless parts in an optical filter manufacturing process, and naturally, after a few months of use/cleaning, they needed to be replaced.
Of course this erodesforcing cones and top straps!
Now, when I put on a tight crimp and don't over load with Lilgun, I don't even see kernel remains on a target 15 feet away. When I was loading 18-19gr, and not crimping properly, I had a bunch of unburned kernels actually stick in the paper at 25 feet!
I can easily see the veocities being higher and the damage it could do directly after the cylinder. It's bead blasting with gunpowder!
I'm glad you posted on this topic.
When I read it, a light poped on for me. I used to bead blast all sorts of stainless parts in an optical filter manufacturing process, and naturally, after a few months of use/cleaning, they needed to be replaced.
Of course this erodesforcing cones and top straps!
Now, when I put on a tight crimp and don't over load with Lilgun, I don't even see kernel remains on a target 15 feet away. When I was loading 18-19gr, and not crimping properly, I had a bunch of unburned kernels actually stick in the paper at 25 feet!
I can easily see the veocities being higher and the damage it could do directly after the cylinder. It's bead blasting with gunpowder!
I'm glad you posted on this topic.
Are you using it in the Herrett? If so, drop me a PM please...30hrrtt wrote:There was a problem with Lil Gun but it was limited. A recall was issued in April of 2003 for I believe one lot that caused high preassure and heat. I use it and really like it.
Sincerely,
Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson