H4198 vs. H4895

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
mergus
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:35 am

H4198 vs. H4895

Post by mergus »

Every year the wife asks what she can get me for a Christmas present. Usually I tell her to get me a die set. This year will be a set of dies for 45-70 to load ammo for my Marlin 1895. I am in the process of looking into what is the right powder to by to use in moderate to heavy loads with 300 to 350 grain LSWC bullets. Even with all the reading I have done on this, I am still somewhat confused on which of these 2 powders to use.

In the Hodgen/IMR reloading manual it mentions 4198 as giving outstanding performance in 45-70, yet I see many recipes for 4595 also.

My question is this: Is there a majority opinion on which powder is better? If so, is it bullet weight dependent? Velocity dependant?

Thanks,
Mergus

PS. I plan on using Trail Boss for plinker loads, so that isin't one of my considerations.
Colt pistols, Marlin rifles and old SxS's.....
Stan in SC
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 806
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:10 pm
Location: Simpsonville,SC

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by Stan in SC »

I use Reloader7.

Stan in SC
The more I listen,the more I hear....and vice versa.

45-70,it's almost a religion
Leverluver
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 4:02 pm
Location: WY

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by Leverluver »

I concur on prefering RE7 but between the two you suggested, 4198 makes better low and midddle of the road loads than 4895. 4895 at lower pressures, where it was not designed to work, is not terribly efficient and can leave a lot of junk in the barrel; as much as 5744 in the 20K pressure area. Depending on what bullet you are using, 4895 does well at top velocities and pressures but so does 4198 but 4198 burns clean on the lower end also.
mergus
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:35 am

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by mergus »

Thanks guys....I had not considered Reloader 7, mainly because as a relatively new reloader I am unfamiliar with it. Why do you like Reloader 7 better?

Mergus
Colt pistols, Marlin rifles and old SxS's.....
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8250
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by TedH »

Of the two you mention, H4198 would be a better choice. I agree with the others though, RL7 is what I use for moderate to heavy loads. IMO it is THE powder for heavy loads in the 45-70.
NRA Life Member
wilko
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 190
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:59 pm
Location: Ct

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by wilko »

i tried realy hard to love H4198 in the 45/70 but i always end up with varget :) clean burning, fills the case just fine and low pressure.. oh, and OUTSTANDING accuracy.
"there's a man going around, taking names.."
mergus
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:35 am

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by mergus »

Guys, thanks to all...This is what I love about this site!

Mergus
Colt pistols, Marlin rifles and old SxS's.....
Terry Murbach
Shootist
Posts: 1682
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: BLACK HILLS, DAKOTA TERRITORY

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by Terry Murbach »

mergus wrote:Guys, thanks to all...This is what I love about this site!

Mergus
DO NOT MAKE ANY---ANY!!!---DECISIONS FROM WHAT YOU READ HERE WITHOUT CONSULTING SEVERAL WRITTEN LOADING MANUALS FOR THE STARTING LOADS.
RIDE, SHOOT STRAIGHT, AND SPEAK THE TRUTH
Lefty Dude
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1459
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 6:31 pm
Location: Arizona Territory

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by Lefty Dude »

H4350 works very well. :wink:

Mike V likes this powder for the 45-70
SASS# 51223
Arizona Cowboy Shooter's Assoc.
Cowtown Cowboy Shooter's Assoc.

Uberti 73/44-40 carbine, Rossi 92/44-40,
Marlin 94CB/44 24" Limited, Winchester 94/30-30
User avatar
Buck Elliott
Member Emeritus
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:15 pm
Location: Halfway up Sheep Mountain -- Cody, Wyoming

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by Buck Elliott »

H335... That's what I use exclusively in my .45-70... 56 gr. under a 405-gr. hard-cast bullet (Oregon Trail LaserCast) with a CCI standard Large Rifle Primer. Straight out of the Speer Handbook.
Regards

Buck

Life has a way of making the foreseeable that which never happens, and the unforeseeable, that which your life becomes...
User avatar
Blaine
Posting leader...
Posts: 30495
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Still Deciding

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by Blaine »

I am using Remington 405s, 43.5 grains of H4198, mixed brass, a CCI standard large rifle primer. It is giving me 1675 to 1725 fps in the 1895 CowBoy and about 1600 in the Guide Gun. I have gone to 51 grains, which was 2000 fps +- 80 fps but really do not enjoy shooting it. Don't use these loads, consult your loading manual and work up to them with your rifle. I use a heavy crimp with the Lee Factory Die Crimp and it burns clean.
The Rotten Fruit Always Hits The Ground First

Proud Life Member Of:
NRA
Second Amendment Foundation
Citizens Committee For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
DAV
JFE
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 343
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:49 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by JFE »

Another vote for R-7. I find its accurate across a broad range of velocities and its quite economical. H-4198 is similar in burning rate and performance.

You might want to consider using RNFP bullets over SWC styles in your levergun. SWC were designed for handguns and dont feed and cycle well in all leverguns.
gary rice
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 496
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:09 pm

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by gary rice »

mergus wrote:Every year the wife asks what she can get me for a Christmas present. Usually I tell her to get me a die set. This year will be a set of dies for 45-70 to load ammo for my Marlin 1895. I am in the process of looking into what is the right powder to by to use in moderate to heavy loads with 300 to 350 grain LSWC bullets. Even with all the reading I have done on this, I am still somewhat confused on which of these 2 powders to use.

In the Hodgen/IMR reloading manual it mentions 4198 as giving outstanding performance in 45-70, yet I see many recipes for 4595 also.

My question is this: Is there a majority opinion on which powder is better? If so, is it bullet weight dependent? Velocity dependant?

Thanks,


If the choice is between 4198 and 4895 ill go with 4895.
Mergus

PS. I plan on using Trail Boss for plinker loads, so that isin't one of my considerations.
g rice
mergus
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:35 am

Re: H4198 vs. H4895 - Terry, you are correct in.....

Post by mergus »

insisting I consult several loading manuals before doing anything. When I said that's what I love about this place, in my brevity I neglected to mention that I meant that I love the advice for what alternate powders to consider. Right after reading the reccomendations for Reloader 7 I pulled out several current manuals that I have that are less than 2 years old and looked up as many recipes as I could find for Reloader 7. Then I looked up the powder burning rate chart to compare Reloader 7 to 4198. None of which I would have done without someone suggesting I consider using Reloader 7.

Again, thank you all.
Mergus
Colt pistols, Marlin rifles and old SxS's.....
User avatar
Mike D.
***Rock Star***
Posts: 4234
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by Mike D. »

XMR 2015 is THE powder for HV .45-70 and .45-90 loads. I get 2300 FPS+ using this powder and Hornady 350 RN bullets. I have yet to load the 250 Barnes TSX with 2015, but that's next on my "try" list. 2400 FPS should be a piece of cake from a 22" barreled 1886 Winchester. :)
"Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale, and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled or hanged"....President Abraham Lincoln
Don McDowell

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by Don McDowell »

If a person must defoul a 45-70 with jacketed bullets and smokeless powder, 3031.
Cast gets aa5744.
But the best is still 2f black :mrgreen:
User avatar
JReed
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 5509
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:17 am
Location: SoCal

Re: H4198 vs. H4895 - Terry, you are correct in.....

Post by JReed »

mergus wrote:insisting I consult several loading manuals before doing anything. When I said that's what I love about this place, in my brevity I neglected to mention that I meant that I love the advice for what alternate powders to consider. Right after reading the reccomendations for Reloader 7 I pulled out several current manuals that I have that are less than 2 years old and looked up as many recipes as I could find for Reloader 7. Then I looked up the powder burning rate chart to compare Reloader 7 to 4198. None of which I would have done without someone suggesting I consider using Reloader 7.

Again, thank you all.
Mergus
Terry is just a big stickler for safety. Let us know what you decide to go with and how it works for you.
Jeremy
GySgt USMC Ret

To err is human, To forgive is devine, Neither of which is Marine Corps policy
Semper Fidelis
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8250
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by TedH »

Mike D. wrote:XMR 2015 is THE powder for HV .45-70 and .45-90 loads. I get 2300 FPS+ using this powder and Hornady 350 RN bullets. I have yet to load the 250 Barnes TSX with 2015, but that's next on my "try" list. 2400 FPS should be a piece of cake from a 22" barreled 1886 Winchester. :)

I've used 2015 quite a bit as well, and it is a leader where velocity is concerned, but I've never had it match RE7 in the accuracy department.
NRA Life Member
User avatar
Blaine
Posting leader...
Posts: 30495
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Still Deciding

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by Blaine »

TedH wrote:
Mike D. wrote:XMR 2015 is THE powder for HV .45-70 and .45-90 loads. I get 2300 FPS+ using this powder and Hornady 350 RN bullets. I have yet to load the 250 Barnes TSX with 2015, but that's next on my "try" list. 2400 FPS should be a piece of cake from a 22" barreled 1886 Winchester. :)

I've used 2015 quite a bit as well, and it is a leader where velocity is concerned, but I've never had it match RE7 in the accuracy department.
:| Ouch, those loads will leave a mark on the front and back both.
The Rotten Fruit Always Hits The Ground First

Proud Life Member Of:
NRA
Second Amendment Foundation
Citizens Committee For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
DAV
gon2shoot
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 309
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: purt near in the middle of Ok.

Re: H4198 vs. H4895

Post by gon2shoot »

I use a LOT of 4198. Generally with 400 to 500 grain bullets, But I find good consistancy and good performance with cast loads.
grit yer teeth an pull the trigger
Post Reply