357 and 44 LeverEvolution ammo- better or not?

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
preventec47
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 240
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:31 pm

357 and 44 LeverEvolution ammo- better or not?

Post by preventec47 »

User avatar
Old Ironsights
Posting leader...
Posts: 15083
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Waiting for the Collapse
Contact:

Re: 357 and 44 LeverEvolution ammo- better or not?

Post by Old Ironsights »

Interesting? Yes. Better? Not necessairly. Especially considering the bullet weight.

"Better" is Grizzly (Leverguns Sponsor) or Buffalo Bore... or the handload equivelents.
C2N14... because life is not energetic enough.
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
User avatar
O.S.O.K.
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 5533
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:15 pm
Location: Deep in the Piney Woods of Mississippi

Re: 357 and 44 LeverEvolution ammo- better or not?

Post by O.S.O.K. »

Old Ironsights wrote:Interesting? Yes. Better? Not necessairly. Especially considering the bullet weight.

"Better" is Grizzly (Leverguns Sponsor) or Buffalo Bore... or the handload equivelents.
+1
NRA Endowment Life
Phi Kappa Sigma, Alpha Phi 83 "Skulls"
OCS, 120th MP Battalion, MSSG
MOLON LABE!
User avatar
Gary
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 353
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:20 pm
Location: CA

Re: 357 and 44 LeverEvolution ammo- better or not?

Post by Gary »

Paid $19 for a box of 25 357mag @ a Bass Pro Shop. It's 140 grain fodder. Shot a group last weekend but want to try it again because I had a scope problem. It "feels" like a full power load when shot but accuracy was not as good as other factory loads I tested.

I guess that means that I will miss faster when the bullet nears the game. :roll:
.45
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 8:24 am
Location: Southeast Nebraska

Re: 357 and 44 LeverEvolution ammo- better or not?

Post by .45 »

Test fired some of the 44's a couple weeks ago. Got a couple of the cardboard "bales" from the local grocery store. At 30 yards the bullet tumbled after hitting the cardboard, did not expand, and only penetrated 21". I then put a 300gr cast ranch dog into the bales. 12" more penetration, larger "wound channel".

I will stick with my cast bullets.
Life has a way of making the foreseeable that which never happens... and the unforeseeable that which your life becomes.
L.F.Combs
Levergunner 1.0
Posts: 67
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:04 pm
Location: Hazard Kentucky
Contact:

Re: 357 and 44 LeverEvolution ammo- better or not?

Post by L.F.Combs »

I bought a couple of boxes. I have shot most of one box. The accuracy in the trapper I have is good, but I have only shot about 5 rounds through the rifle, and five through my sp101. I have a guy that is doing an article on the .357 for my local magazine, but I haven't seen the article yet. I will update later if anyone wants.
PERRY COUNTY OUTDOORS MAGAZINE @
Image
User avatar
6pt-sika
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 9718
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 7:15 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: 357 and 44 LeverEvolution ammo- better or not?

Post by 6pt-sika »

I've purchased 2 boxes if each . And to be honest I've not shot any of either !

Personally I feel if a person likes the idea of this style bullet they'll like it and if they don't care for it they won't have much good to say about it !

And what about me you might ask !

I like just about everything and it is my intention to try as many different things as I can before they strike the match and burn my dead decaying carcass :wink:

I can say this I have shot the LE ammo in 30-30 , 308 Express , 35 REM , 444 , 450 and 45-70 on paper and it ALL shot well in my Marlin XLR's .

Now as to the hunting abilities of these rounds I have killed one deer with the 30-30 with one shot and it was a bang tip tip tip flop . Kill two deer and two fox with the 308 and ALL were boom flop . Killed one deer with the 35 with one shot and it was boom flop ! The 450 Marlin was fired twice at deer . One was a boom flop and the other was a boom 30 tips and a flop !

I have yet to try the 444 or 45-70 but I truely see no reason for them not to follow suit !

I might add I also have a couple boxes of this stuff for the 32 Winchester , but have yet to fire any of it ! When I ordered it I was kinda hoping Marlin would bring the 32 Special out in a 336XLR . But so far NO CIGAR !

It is my intention to set all my XLR's aside for these rubber tipped bullets and by no means am I saying thats what everyone should do ! But thats what I'm gonna do !

I have plenty other rifles in all those calibers to shoot jacketed or cast handloads :!:
Parkers , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s , 6.5mm's and my family in the Philippines !
User avatar
El Chivo
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3659
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:12 pm
Location: Red River Gorge Area

Re: 357 and 44 LeverEvolution ammo- better or not?

Post by El Chivo »

hey you guys should be shooting that stuff at 230 yards not 30 yards, and see if it holds its accuracy better, that's what it's for.
"I'll tell you what living is. You get up when you feel like it. You fry yourself some eggs. You see what kind of a day it is."
L.F.Combs
Levergunner 1.0
Posts: 67
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:04 pm
Location: Hazard Kentucky
Contact:

Re: 357 and 44 LeverEvolution ammo- better or not?

Post by L.F.Combs »

I read the article today, and the writer gave it a good review, so I went out today, and shot some more with this ammo. As far accuracy goes this stuff is good, I shot my 94 trapper .357 magnum, with a good rest put three almost through the same hole. If it penetrats good on an animal this is pretty good stuff. I want to see it in the field hunting before I go a gushy as my writer.
PERRY COUNTY OUTDOORS MAGAZINE @
Image
Jason_W
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1020
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 3:50 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
Contact:

Re: 357 and 44 LeverEvolution ammo- better or not?

Post by Jason_W »

I chronied some of the .357 stuff today. Out of my carbine, it clocked in at a little over 1700 f/s. I can drive a 180 grain bullet to that with my handloads. It penetrated 7.5" into a bullet test tube.
My first attempt at an outdoors website: http://www.diyballistics.com
L.F.Combs
Levergunner 1.0
Posts: 67
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:04 pm
Location: Hazard Kentucky
Contact:

Re: 357 and 44 LeverEvolution ammo- better or not?

Post by L.F.Combs »

I have the article on-line at my site. I like it, but I still think that the tip is going to keep it from penetrating at close range. At 75 to 100 yards it may get better. It is accurate in fact it is the only low grain bullet ammo that my trapper shoots good. I still like my partitions, and hard casts.
PERRY COUNTY OUTDOORS MAGAZINE @
Image
Post Reply