Engineering vs Manufacturing; battleships ww2
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Engineering vs Manufacturing; battleships ww2
.
Big Screwup…!
https://youtu.be/8rrXs9vPfE8?si=k5ZYAd_EusV_QKvi
It would’ve been interesting to be at that meeting when they realize they were off a few feet…
Big Screwup…!
https://youtu.be/8rrXs9vPfE8?si=k5ZYAd_EusV_QKvi
It would’ve been interesting to be at that meeting when they realize they were off a few feet…
It's 2025 - "Cutesy Time is OVER....!" [Dan Bongino]
- gamekeeper
- Spambot Zapper
- Posts: 18311
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:32 pm
- Location: Englandistan twinned with Palestine
Re: Engineering vs Manufacturing; battleships ww2
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Whatever you do always give 100%........... unless you are donating blood.
Re: Engineering vs Manufacturing; battleships ww2
Literally down the street sits the USS Iowa. It is a marvel of marine engineering. Especially when you consider how fast it went from concept to finished vessel.
But it was also far from perfect. It was modified several times to correct initial design flaws and to update it to newer technology as it came on line.
The class was designed primarily for ship to ship engagements. Yet by the time it was designed the airplane had proven itself as the future of anti-ship weaponry.
It’s secondary use was shore bombardment. It was primarily used in this capacity.
A tertiary use was, and possibly its most important role was as an antiaircraft platform to protect the new darling of naval warfare, the aircraft carrier.
But it was also far from perfect. It was modified several times to correct initial design flaws and to update it to newer technology as it came on line.
The class was designed primarily for ship to ship engagements. Yet by the time it was designed the airplane had proven itself as the future of anti-ship weaponry.
It’s secondary use was shore bombardment. It was primarily used in this capacity.
A tertiary use was, and possibly its most important role was as an antiaircraft platform to protect the new darling of naval warfare, the aircraft carrier.
Jeepnik AKA "Old Eyes"
"Go low, go slow and preferably in the dark" The old Sarge (he was maybe 24.
"Freedom is never more that a generation from extinction" Ronald Reagan
"Every man should have at least one good rifle and know how to use it" Dad
"Go low, go slow and preferably in the dark" The old Sarge (he was maybe 24.
"Freedom is never more that a generation from extinction" Ronald Reagan
"Every man should have at least one good rifle and know how to use it" Dad
Re: Engineering vs Manufacturing; battleships ww2
Never got to see the USS Iowa over in the Tonkin Gulf (Vietnam) while it was over there. It was retired from service before I got over there myself.
While in Subic Bay, Phillipines, I was driving a guy from my ship up to the hospital and passed by a yard area where a bunch of large "telephone poles" were stored on blocks. The old chief gunners mate riding along commented that those were extra gun barrels for the Iowa.
While in Subic Bay, Phillipines, I was driving a guy from my ship up to the hospital and passed by a yard area where a bunch of large "telephone poles" were stored on blocks. The old chief gunners mate riding along commented that those were extra gun barrels for the Iowa.
Re: Engineering vs Manufacturing; battleships ww2
Deleted.
Last edited by Ray on Sun Jan 19, 2025 6:43 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Engineering vs Manufacturing; battleships ww2
Ray,
I had to look up a Knox Class "can" and realized you were on a DE (destroyer escort), or that's how they were classified while I was in.
Regards, Vic
I had to look up a Knox Class "can" and realized you were on a DE (destroyer escort), or that's how they were classified while I was in.
Regards, Vic
Re: Engineering vs Manufacturing; battleships ww2
Deleted.
Last edited by Ray on Sun Jan 19, 2025 6:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Griff
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 21335
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
- Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!
Re: Engineering vs Manufacturing; battleships ww2
I spent just under 2 years on a converted Forrest-Sherman class Destroyer, removing 2 5" gun mounts and installing the Tartar missile system in their place, making it a Guided Missile Destroyer, or DDG. I arrived Jan 2, 1972 and left on Dec 5, 1973, making 2 WestPacs aboard. The Newport News was a Heavy Cruiser and during 1972 I saw her a couple of times. She could stand off the coast several miles farther than we and bombard inland targets farther than we could only 1-2 miles off the coast.
She survived the planned sinking by Air Force B-52s as a target ship, finally settling to her final home off HI, being boarded by Navy EOD experts and having her keel broken.
She survived the planned sinking by Air Force B-52s as a target ship, finally settling to her final home off HI, being boarded by Navy EOD experts and having her keel broken.
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93
There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93
There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
Re: Engineering vs Manufacturing; battleships ww2
Deleted.
Last edited by Ray on Sun Jan 19, 2025 6:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Engineering vs Manufacturing; battleships ww2
.
Thanks for sharing that, Ray.
Wow what a photo…

…talk about muzzle blast…!!!
Thanks for sharing that, Ray.
Wow what a photo…

…talk about muzzle blast…!!!
It's 2025 - "Cutesy Time is OVER....!" [Dan Bongino]