Marlin 1894 vs Steel Henry Big Boy action Strength
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
-
- Levergunner
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2022 9:17 pm
Marlin 1894 vs Steel Henry Big Boy action Strength
Of the two above choices, which action is stronger? I've read the 1894 doesn't lock up as well on the right side of the firearm due to the way the cut out is made. I also read somewhere yesterday the steel big boy is closer to marlin 336 in action strength. I ask this because one of these two rifles will be a starting point for a wildcat chambering I'm looking to do.
Thanks in advance for your time!
Chinook
Thanks in advance for your time!
Chinook
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Steel Henry Big Boy action Strength
I thought the Henry was basically a Marlin copy but idk
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Steel Henry Big Boy action Strength
Pure speculation, but just looking at the two designs it seems pretty certain that the Big Boy action is the stronger of the two. The question then becomes -- so what? Both are more than strong enough for the cartridges for which they are chambered.
- AJMD429
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 32800
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
- Location: Hoosierland
- Contact:
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Steel Henry Big Boy action Strength
.
There are some people on the forum who have wildcatted the short action leverguns, so they might chime in shortly.
The design would be one factor but the alloy could be a huge other factor.
Also - a sometimes missed factor is the diameter of the two necessary holes in the receiver front, especially if the cartridge diameter starts causing a thin barrel shank. I'd never want to have to enlarge the magazine hole, for sure.
Good luck with your project and hopefully you can keep pressures low enough strength won't be an issue; still nice to have the biggest margin of safety possible.
There are some people on the forum who have wildcatted the short action leverguns, so they might chime in shortly.
The design would be one factor but the alloy could be a huge other factor.
Also - a sometimes missed factor is the diameter of the two necessary holes in the receiver front, especially if the cartridge diameter starts causing a thin barrel shank. I'd never want to have to enlarge the magazine hole, for sure.
Good luck with your project and hopefully you can keep pressures low enough strength won't be an issue; still nice to have the biggest margin of safety possible.
Last edited by AJMD429 on Mon Feb 21, 2022 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.
Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.
Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Steel Henry Big Boy action Strength
Please keep us posted with progress on your project ! Of course pictures would also be greatly appreciated .
Gettin old ain't for sissies!
There just has to be dogs in heaven !
There just has to be dogs in heaven !
-
- Senior Levergunner
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Steel Henry Big Boy action Strength
Not an engineer, but the Henry is noticeably heavier than the Marlin. So my assumption would be more metal in the Henry. I can't say if it is in spots to make it stronger. Logic says it might be a bit stronger. For pistol rounds, I would guess a 92 to be the strongest.
-
- Site Sponsor
- Posts: 2507
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 12:05 pm
- Location: Lampasas, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Steel Henry Big Boy action Strength
The square bolt marlins are not as strong as the round bolt marlins or the Henrys. The round breech bolt is totally enclosed over the locking bolt. The square bolt like you said is not supported on the right side.chinookpilot77 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 20, 2022 1:02 pm Of the two above choices, which action is stronger? I've read the 1894 doesn't lock up as well on the right side of the firearm due to the way the cut out is made. I also read somewhere yesterday the steel big boy is closer to marlin 336 in action strength. I ask this because one of these two rifles will be a starting point for a wildcat chambering I'm looking to do.
Thanks in advance for your time!
Chinook
Steve Young aka Nate Kiowa Jones Sass# 6765
Steve's Guns aka "Rossi 92 Specialists"
205 Antler lane
Lampasas, Texas 76550
http://www.stevesgunz.com
Email; steve@stevesgunz.com
Tel: 512-564-1015
Steve's Guns aka "Rossi 92 Specialists"
205 Antler lane
Lampasas, Texas 76550
http://www.stevesgunz.com
Email; steve@stevesgunz.com
Tel: 512-564-1015
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Steel Henry Big Boy action Strength
Heavier metal doesn't necessarily have greater tensile strength. Depends entirely on the alloy and things l machining and heat treating.
Jeepnik AKA "Old Eyes"
"Go low, go slow and preferably in the dark" The old Sarge (he was maybe 24.
"Freedom is never more that a generation from extinction" Ronald Reagan
"Every man should have at least one good rifle and know how to use it" Dad
"Go low, go slow and preferably in the dark" The old Sarge (he was maybe 24.
"Freedom is never more that a generation from extinction" Ronald Reagan
"Every man should have at least one good rifle and know how to use it" Dad
-
- Levergunner
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2022 9:17 pm
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Steel Henry Big Boy action Strength
The question becomes an issue when wildcatting a round for said rifle, and trying to get better performance within acceptable safety margins and longevity of the rifle.
- CowboyTutt
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 3789
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:27 pm
- Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Steel Henry Big Boy action Strength
Um, I would go with what Nate Kiowa Jones said. He's amazing guy! -Tutt
"It ain't dead! As long as there's ONE COWBOY taking care of ONE COW, it ain't dead!!!" (the Cowboy Way)
-Monte Walsh (Selleck version)
"These battered wings still kick up dust." -Peter Gabriel
-Monte Walsh (Selleck version)
"These battered wings still kick up dust." -Peter Gabriel
-
- Senior Levergunner
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Steel Henry Big Boy action Strength
me too!CowboyTutt wrote: ↑Sat Feb 26, 2022 5:02 pm Um, I would go with what Nate Kiowa Jones said. He's amazing guy! -Tutt
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4145
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:34 am
- Location: north of Palacios about 1400 miles
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Steel Henry Big Boy action Strength
What cartridge, bullet, velocity and distance you striving for? I'm on my 4th wildcat but have only kept 2. I still like to have a 25/35 Tomcat but the 250 Savage does everything I want to do with a .25 caliber cartridge... todd3leg
30/30 Winchester: Not accurate enough fer varmints, barely adequate for small deer; BUT In a 10" to 14" barrelled pistol; is good for moose/elk to 200 yards; ground squirrels to 300 metres
250 Savage... its what the 223 wishes it could be...!
250 Savage... its what the 223 wishes it could be...!