Naval Gunfire

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
Bullard4075
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1260
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:14 pm
Location: Billings, Montana

Naval Gunfire

Post by Bullard4075 »

Watching a Iwo Jima documentary I'm curious the procedure for naval gun bombardment.How do they see the targets after the initial explosions? Is it all optical. I read some targeting is done with aircraft but isn't most just by sight? Anyone have experience to relate or some good reading to recommend.
"Any man who covers his face and packs a gun is a legitimate target for any decent citizen"
Jeff Cooper
Chuck 100 yd
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6972
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:52 pm
Location: Ridgefield WA. USA

Re: Naval Gunfire

Post by Chuck 100 yd »

Spotters called in any corrections from field positions or craft closer to the impact zone. There were surprisingly accurate fire control instruments even before modern electronics and satalite GPS tracking not to mention the super accurate Doppler radar that can track a bullet in flight that we have today.
User avatar
Blaine
Posting leader...
Posts: 30496
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Still Deciding

Re: Naval Gunfire

Post by Blaine »

I know their analog fire control had an adjustment that took into consideration curve of the earth....IIRC, it was the same factor that control surveys use.
The Rotten Fruit Always Hits The Ground First

Proud Life Member Of:
NRA
Second Amendment Foundation
Citizens Committee For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
DAV
Pete44ru
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11242
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 7:26 am

Re: Naval Gunfire

Post by Pete44ru »

.

Fire control fundamentals: http://archive.hnsa.org/doc/firecontrol/partk.htm

Current fire control:

Image


WW II fire control:


Image

.
User avatar
Jayhawker
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 313
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: Naval Gunfire

Post by Jayhawker »

Love naval gunfire, too bad it's been replaced by missiles.

Image
Well done is better than well said.
Booger Bill
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2268
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 5:23 pm

Re: Naval Gunfire

Post by Booger Bill »

How do they compensate for the ship rolling on the waves?
Bullard4075
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1260
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:14 pm
Location: Billings, Montana

Re: Naval Gunfire

Post by Bullard4075 »

Booger Bill wrote:How do they compensate for the ship rolling on the waves?
I've read more than one account that mentioned that once the firing keys (triggers) was closed the fire control (computer) would wait till the ship rolled to the proper point before firing.
"Any man who covers his face and packs a gun is a legitimate target for any decent citizen"
Jeff Cooper
Booger Bill
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2268
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 5:23 pm

Re: Naval Gunfire

Post by Booger Bill »

Thanks. Amazing!
User avatar
Old Ironsights
Posting leader...
Posts: 15084
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Waiting for the Collapse
Contact:

Re: Naval Gunfire

Post by Old Ironsights »

As an FO for an 8" battalion, I got so I could have the ranging gun hit a single tree on the impact area within 3 or fewer shots from a Hasty. From a Fixed I could do it in 1 to 2. (That really PO'd the Brass... they wanted me to "bracket"... I liked to Target... Shot... Splash... Target Destroyed... the ammo wasters hated that...)

That's 200+lbs of HE hitting a 2'x2' square from Far, Far away over a few hills. After that, I could hit anything within the Grid that I wanted them to hit. Got "technical" Pickup? My guys would put a single round into the bed. The new rocket launchers (MLRS etc that I had to introduce) can't do that...

Getting rid of the M110 then was as dumb as getting rid of the A10 is now...
C2N14... because life is not energetic enough.
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
TraderVic
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 763
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2015 5:19 pm
Location: Western WI

Re: Naval Gunfire

Post by TraderVic »

Booger Bill wrote:How do they compensate for the ship rolling on the waves?
I served on destroyers in the Pacific. I was trained in ASW ( anti submarine warfare ), but while operating in the Tonkin Gulf ( South/North Vietnam ), sonar was secured and most of us were reassigned to other stations as we were part of Weapons Division.

I was assigned to the forward 5" gun mount, which had twin 5" guns ( 5" 38's ) where I loaded either powders or projectiles in the port gun.

On board ship's is a gyrocompass that is connected to each of the gun mounts. As the ship rolls ( and they do ), the gyro adjusts the guns up or down, but with the roll so the guns don't change their actual "aim".

The illustrations above are accurate regarding the fire control director that was used to spot targets and they actually "pulled the triggers" on the big guns. I wsas never in the director so I don't know any specifics about their capabilities or operation. In sonar, we controlled and fired the ASW weapons ( homing torpedoes and/or ASROC's ).

Back then, all weapons "computers" were analog and performed remarkably well. I can't even imagine hoe much our weapons capabilities have improved/changed with the advancements of the computer chip.

Vic
J35
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 527
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:11 pm

Re: Naval Gunfire

Post by J35 »

Booger Bill wrote:How do they compensate for the ship rolling on the waves?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-z3JLZmu_Lw

Here is a description of how the North Carolina class battle ships fire control worked.

Also some good history .

---------J
Keep The Peace, Love and Harmony, These are the Gold Nuggets, All Else Is Sand !!
BAGTIC
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:37 pm

Re: Naval Gunfire

Post by BAGTIC »

Old Ironsights wrote:As an FO for an 8" battalion, I got so I could have the ranging gun hit a single tree on the impact area within 3 or fewer shots from a Hasty. From a Fixed I could do it in 1 to 2. (That really PO'd the Brass... they wanted me to "bracket"... I liked to Target... Shot... Splash... Target Destroyed... the ammo wasters hated that...)

That's 200+lbs of HE hitting a 2'x2' square from Far, Far away over a few hills. After that, I could hit anything within the Grid that I wanted them to hit. Got "technical" Pickup? My guys would put a single round into the bed. The new rocket launchers (MLRS etc that I had to introduce) can't do that...

Getting rid of the M110 then was as dumb as getting rid of the A10 is now...

Where do you get the "200+ lbs of HE"? The HC Mark 25 only contained 21.37 lbs. (9.7 kg) Explosive D
User avatar
Old Ironsights
Posting leader...
Posts: 15084
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Waiting for the Collapse
Contact:

Re: Naval Gunfire

Post by Old Ironsights »

OK, OK, the M106 HE Projectile weighed apriox 200lbs and had 36.3 lbs TNT or 38.8 lbs of Comp B as filler. Picky, picky...

They were 200lb HE shells you could drop in a pickup bed.
C2N14... because life is not energetic enough.
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
.45colt
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4772
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:00 am
Location: North Coast of America-Ohio

Re: Naval Gunfire

Post by .45colt »

AWESOME POST GUYS, I have twice stood on the deck of the North Carolina in Wilmington. God Bless All That Served.
Post Reply