380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8301
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by TedH »

Had a little time, so I whipped up a batch of gelatin to shoot some various 380 rounds into for a comparison. My choices were limited to a factory load of a 90 gr. Corbon JHP, a handloaded Remington 102 gr. Golden Sabre, and a handloaded cast bullet from the Ranch Dog mold that weighs 103 gr. cast from clip on wheelweights and air cooled, and powder coated, nothing fancy.

Image

I covered the 6x6x12 inch block of gel with a single layer of an old moving blanket, it's a fairly thick material that's sort of like flannel or felt, only substantially thicker. That should simulate a jacket and shirt fairly closely.

I had set up my chrono to capture velocitys, but the sun was at a low angle and I didn't get consistent readings, so I won't include them here now, but I will reshoot for speed at a later time. I can say that the Corbon load is hot, and I loaded both of mine to max book data with Unique. I shot the block from a distance of about 6 feet.

First up was the Ranch Dog cast bullet. It had no trouble fully penetrating the entire block and both layers of the blanket (front and back of the block). It then punched into about a half inch of the dry phone book I had backing the gel block, and bounced back through the blanket again into the block headed the opposite direction!

The Corbon and the Golden Sabre were both retained inside the gel, and penetrated to a depth of 8" and 9" respectively.

Image


Not surprisingly, the cast bullet plowed a straight line, with a fairly small wound channel that was pretty much the same the length of the block.
The Golden Sabre, and the Corbon JHP both appeared to rapidly expand, and violently. The Golden Sabre shown in the middle, had a somewhat larger wound cavity than the Corbon, and it shed some lead fragments around the 2-3 inch mark.

Image

Image

As expected, the cast bullet retained all it's original weight.

Image

The Golden Sabre lost the largest percentage of weight, but still very acceptable 95.6 gr. from the original 102.

Image

The 90 gr. Corbon also held on to most of it's weight, only loosing 0.6 gr.

Image

The cast bullet riveted a tad, growing to .375"

Image

The Golden Sabre had the most expansion, which goes along with the largest wound cavity.

Image

The Corbon was right behind the Remington bullet though with good expansion to .645"

Image

Image

So there you have it, you can take it for what it's worth. I'd like to include a few more bullets in the testing later on, but this at least gives me an idea as to the 380's performance, or lack of, depending on your opinion of the 380 as a defensive round. This isn't scientific by any means, I just enjoy playing around with it and hope you enjoyed reading it.
NRA Life Member
User avatar
Old Ironsights
Posting leader...
Posts: 15084
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Waiting for the Collapse
Contact:

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Old Ironsights »

Head shots.

Of course, lack of penetration is exactly why the FRG Polezi gave up their .32s and went to 9mm...

(Love that Walther BTW...)
Last edited by Old Ironsights on Fri Feb 21, 2014 9:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
C2N14... because life is not energetic enough.
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
User avatar
vancelw
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3950
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:56 pm
Location: 90% NE Texas and 10% SE Montana

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by vancelw »

Thanks, Ted. Interesting.
"Make yourself an honest man, and then you may be sure that there is one less scoundrel in the world." - Thomas Carlyle
User avatar
plowboy 45
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1370
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:42 pm
Location: PURVIS, MISSISSIPPI

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by plowboy 45 »

Thanks very interesting
new pig hunter
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1363
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 5:11 pm
Location: SoCal

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by new pig hunter »

I have that same pistol so I am all ears as to all testing and results and thoughts and opinions.

Cheers,

Carl
Mac in Mo
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 714
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 6:05 pm

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Mac in Mo »

Good post Ted. I have always pretty much ignored the .380. The talk of it on here lately has really caught my attention. Keep it coming.


Thanks, Kevin
1894c

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by 1894c »

Ted-- really like your Walther PPK too (owned one years ago)...very cool test and info...but for me the .380acp (.9mm short/Kurtz) is a little on the light side for self defense, especially if winter clothing is encountered...I feel the same about 5-shot J-frame revolver types...but that's just my lousy cranky back-east opinion... :)
Mescalero
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6180
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Mescalero »

Thank you for taking the time.
User avatar
gamekeeper
Spambot Zapper
Posts: 17682
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:32 pm
Location: Over the pond unfortunately.

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by gamekeeper »

I enjoyed your post, here in the UK I can only read about modern handguns.... :(
Whatever you do always give 100%........... unless you are donating blood.
User avatar
Old Ironsights
Posting leader...
Posts: 15084
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Waiting for the Collapse
Contact:

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Old Ironsights »

game keeper wrote:I enjoyed your post, here in the UK I can only read about modern handguns.... :(
Or get very good at hiding them... :twisted: :wink:
C2N14... because life is not energetic enough.
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
User avatar
Malamute
Member Emeritus
Posts: 3781
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:56 am
Location: Rocky Mts

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Malamute »

Good post Ted.

I've only recently been understanding calibrating the gel to make each test truly comparable. Have you looked into that? I understand it isn't too hard but involves a couple more steps. Calibrated tests have the BB shown in the pictures. When properly set up and used at the correct temps, the gel will take a bb at a prescribed velocity and it will penetrate a certain depth range, ensuring the test will be directly comparable to other gel tests as to penetration depths and bullet performance.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-

Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8301
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by TedH »

I have read about calibrating the gel but I've not gone to the trouble. I mix it by weight, the same every time and keep it at the same temperature, so that's close enough for me.
NRA Life Member
Rusty
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 9528
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: Central Fla

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Rusty »

Ted, I've been reading a lot about the powder coating and was wondering, do you know how those bullets would do if they were cast from very soft lead? I don't think I've seen that addressed.
If you're gonna be stupid ya gotta be tough-
Isiah 55:8&9

It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled.
User avatar
SteveR
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:14 am
Location: New York

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by SteveR »

Thanks for posting Ted, I find it very helpful. I have a .32NAA, which is a .380 necked down to .32, makes for a nice summer carry and back up to my .45 ACP.
Please keep posting.

Steve
User avatar
SteveR
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:14 am
Location: New York

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by SteveR »

Rusty wrote:Ted, I've been reading a lot about the powder coating and was wondering, do you know how those bullets would do if they were cast from very soft lead? I don't think I've seen that addressed.
Very good idea, I was thinking the powder coat would act like a jacket.

Steve
Mescalero
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6180
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Mescalero »

SteveR,
Have you done simular tests with your .32 NAA?
I have a Llama parts gun with a piece of extra slide, I am going to do a longslide Llama in .32 NAA.
User avatar
Grizz
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 12366
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:15 pm

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Grizz »

plenty of penetration with the cast. that's so useful and interesting. it makes the cast load the only option for wife's gun.

I'd love to see the comparison to the 147 gr fmjfp she carries, would you like me to send a few?

In my waterjug tests, not the same thing BUT able to compare like to like, the load we use penetrated to about the same place as the 9mm gold dots we carry. I'm curious about the gel comparison. Looks like you could use a 2-block train for that one.

Grizz
User avatar
SteveR
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:14 am
Location: New York

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by SteveR »

Mescalero wrote:SteveR,
Have you done simular tests with your .32 NAA?
I have a Llama parts gun with a piece of extra slide, I am going to do a longslide Llama in .32 NAA.
No, but it would be interesting to see the results.
I would love to see how that shoots with the longer barrel. I have the NAA with the short barrel, I bet yours would run upwards of 2000 fps, with the 60gr Hornady XTP.

Steve
Mescalero
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6180
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Mescalero »

I don't think that fast, but what I was looking for is the consistency of shooting from a locked link design.
My model is an older one with a real link, no rib on top of the slide.
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8301
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by TedH »

Rusty wrote:Ted, I've been reading a lot about the powder coating and was wondering, do you know how those bullets would do if they were cast from very soft lead? I don't think I've seen that addressed.
I haven't cast these 380 bullets from anything but wheelweights. I have played quite a bit with 45acp cast hollow points with various alloys trying to find a good balance between expansion and penetration, along with varying the depth of the hollow point. From what I've seen I think you could push powder coated soft lead as fast as you wanted to from a pistol cartridge.
NRA Life Member
Rusty
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 9528
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: Central Fla

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Rusty »

I was thinking that a soft lead bullet covered with powdercoat would be about as close as you could get to the old Nyclad rounds and they were said to be excellent stoppers.
If you're gonna be stupid ya gotta be tough-
Isiah 55:8&9

It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled.
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8301
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by TedH »

That's what I was after with the 45acp hollow points. I thought the flat nose design of these 380 bullets would be better hard, but it might be worth a try to cast some soft and see what they do.
NRA Life Member
3leggedturtle
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4145
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:34 am
Location: north of Palacios about 1400 miles

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by 3leggedturtle »

Great report and tests. Did Imiss which one you would prefer for carrying? Seeing that Walther reminds of all the gunshows back in 70's when I was young and broke.
30/30 Winchester: Not accurate enough fer varmints, barely adequate for small deer; BUT In a 10" to 14" barrelled pistol; is good for moose/elk to 200 yards; ground squirrels to 300 metres

250 Savage... its what the 223 wishes it could be...!
User avatar
MacEntyre
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 525
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 7:50 am
Location: NC

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by MacEntyre »

Great information!

I don't have to worry about the performance of 380 relative to other options... I have enough 380 ammo to last the rest of my life, and a Colt Pony Pcketlite. I don't sell Colts, so I will use this little gem whenever it is appropriate, not matter what might be better for self defense. ;)
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8301
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by TedH »

3leggedturtle wrote:Great report and tests. Did Imiss which one you would prefer for carrying? Seeing that Walther reminds of all the gunshows back in 70's when I was young and broke.
I think this small demonstration shows what a lot of people already say, the 380 is about as small a caliber as I'd be comfortable with for defense against a ner-do-well. That being said, I'm still going to carry my 45 when practical, but when I'm carrying the 380 I would be fine with any of those loads, but I favor the Golden Sabre just because of the heavier starting weight and the impressive wound cavity. I know some folks like more penetration, but let's face it, most of us are not cops on the street. My loads don't necessarily have to pass the FBI standard. If and when I need my gun, I probably won't be needing to shoot through a car door or a sheet rock wall. More than likely is going to be up close and personal, with a good chance of bystanders around, or I'll be inside my dwelling. Neither of which would I want a bullet that's like the energizer bunny and just keeps going and going. If I can ever get a hold of some Speer Gold Dots I will certainly try them too. They have become the standard to which all others are compared, imo.
NRA Life Member
Mescalero
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6180
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Mescalero »

Thank you for taking the time and energy to do this.
User avatar
Ysabel Kid
Moderator
Posts: 28220
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA
Contact:

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Ysabel Kid »

Thank you for sharing this info!
Image
samb
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:47 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by samb »

Thanks for the write and test. Really enjoyed reading it.
BrentD

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by BrentD »

Interesting post. I would love to see what you get from a much softer lead bullet though. Something like 20:1 or 30:1 lead:tin mix.
User avatar
Tycer
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 7718
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:17 am
Location: Asheville, NC

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Tycer »

Can I send you a few of the Win white box flat points? I've seen them in meat but I'd like to see them in the same conditions as your other tests.
Kind regards,
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
EdinCT
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 783
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Southeast CT

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by EdinCT »

Ted, Thanks for posting. I to have switched from 1911 to a S&W J frame in warmer weather. In CT you have to worry about upsetting the sheeple, so concealed is important to me.
Goes to show while maybe not ideal these are much better than a sharp stick.
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8301
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by TedH »

Tycer wrote:Can I send you a few of the Win white box flat points? I've seen them in meat but I'd like to see them in the same conditions as your other tests.
Sure. I'm trying to get some Gold Dots to try and I'll also cast some of the lead bullets softer for the next round.
NRA Life Member
BrentD

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by BrentD »

I look forward to hearing about those soft lead bullets. I've got a .380 that would be better off with lead than with the modern bullet I think.
User avatar
horsesoldier03
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2107
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:32 pm
Location: Kansas

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by horsesoldier03 »

Great info. I would be curious to see how a .38 spc snubnose compares to the .380.
Gun Control is not about guns, it is about control!
User avatar
Tycer
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 7718
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:17 am
Location: Asheville, NC

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Tycer »

horsesoldier03 wrote:Great info. I would be curious to see how a .38 spc snubnose compares to the .380.
Substantially better. Heavier bullet running faster. The meat tests I've done give the 38 much better penetration with hollowpoints and cast.
Kind regards,
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
User avatar
GonnePhishin
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1952
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:23 pm
Location: Bodecker's BBQ Bar & Grill

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by GonnePhishin »

Thanks for the data and pictures, which are quite impressive. I've never heard of powder coating lead bullets, however.
"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." - Thomas Jefferson

"I know not what course other men may take, but as for me, Give me Liberty or Give me Death!" - Patrick Henry
Mescalero
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6180
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Mescalero »

Tycer,
What gun were you shooting .380 out of?
Rusty
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 9528
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: Central Fla

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Rusty »

Uncle Buck, if you look over on the castboolits forums you see more about powder coating than you can read in a week.
If you're gonna be stupid ya gotta be tough-
Isiah 55:8&9

It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled.
Pete44ru
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11242
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 7:26 am

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Pete44ru »

.

Very interesting, Ted - thanks for posting your report.

It's especially relevant to me, since I yesterday bought a pristine Browning Model 1955 .380 pocket pistol from a local funshop, that I want to CCW in deep cover, since it's so nice & thin.

Image


.
BrentD

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by BrentD »

that Browning looks a lot like my old Remington 51
User avatar
Tycer
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 7718
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:17 am
Location: Asheville, NC

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Tycer »

Mescalero wrote:Tycer,
What gun were you shooting .380 out of?
P3AT and either a snub Smith 36 or 60 for the 38s. I've had really great luck with this little piece of plastic and metal P3AT. The only FTFs I've ever had were with reloads and those were either bulged or over crimped.
Kind regards,
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
Mescalero
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6180
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Mescalero »

I am not familiar with that gun, what type of action?
User avatar
Tycer
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 7718
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:17 am
Location: Asheville, NC

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Tycer »

Kind regards,
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8301
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by TedH »

Pete44ru wrote:.

Very interesting, Ted - thanks for posting your report.

It's especially relevant to me, since I yesterday bought a pristine Browning Model 1955 .380 pocket pistol from a local funshop, that I want to CCW in deep cover, since it's so nice & thin.

Image


.
Now that is one sweet 380! :mrgreen:
NRA Life Member
Mescalero
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6180
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Mescalero »

My friend Keith had one of those when we were young, there is an interesting quirk to these actions.
I have to think about it for a while.
Not suitable subject matter for open debate.
Bill in Oregon
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 9426
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:05 am
Location: The Land of Enchantment

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Bill in Oregon »

Pete, that Browning is absolutely immaculate. Nice find!
Ted, really looking forward to your results with powder-coated soft-cast boolits.
I have to try this powder coating thing ...
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8301
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by TedH »

BrentD wrote:I look forward to hearing about those soft lead bullets. I've got a .380 that would be better off with lead than with the modern bullet I think.
Finally got around to trying soft lead bullets. I cast them from stick on wheel weights, and powder coated them like the others. Same power and charge weight as before too. I thought before I bothered with mixing up a batch of gel, I'd check and make sure the accuracy was acceptable. I'm not too demanding of the smallish gun, but want to make sure a center mass hit was likely at 25 yards. A fired 5 rounds from a sandbag rest at 25 yards. There was 1 hole in the target, not just the 8x11 paper, the entire backing cardboard piece that was about 3'x4'. :shock:

Since the first part of this report, that Walther was sold and replaced with a G42. While the little Glock shoots harder clip on wheel weight bullets quite well, apparently the polygonal rifling is not compatable with the very soft lead.

So that idea of soft lead is obviously scrapped for me.
NRA Life Member
User avatar
Blaine
Posting leader...
Posts: 30496
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Still Deciding

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Blaine »

TedH wrote:
BrentD wrote:I look forward to hearing about those soft lead bullets. I've got a .380 that would be better off with lead than with the modern bullet I think.
Finally got around to trying soft lead bullets. I cast them from stick on wheel weights, and powder coated them like the others. Same power and charge weight as before too. I thought before I bothered with mixing up a batch of gel, I'd check and make sure the accuracy was acceptable. I'm not too demanding of the smallish gun, but want to make sure a center mass hit was likely at 25 yards. A fired 5 rounds from a sandbag rest at 25 yards. There was 1 hole in the target, not just the 8x11 paper, the entire backing cardboard piece that was about 3'x4'. :shock:

Since the first part of this report, that Walther was sold and replaced with a G42. While the little Glock shoots harder clip on wheel weight bullets quite well, apparently the polygonal rifling is not compatable with the very soft lead.

So that idea of soft lead is obviously scrapped for me.
Wow....Not in any way doubting your reporting, but that just don't sound right.....Were there signs leading in the rifling? Do you think that making them oversized would help?
The Rotten Fruit Always Hits The Ground First

Proud Life Member Of:
NRA
Second Amendment Foundation
Citizens Committee For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
DAV
User avatar
Paladin
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1932
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:55 am
Location: Not Working (much)

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by Paladin »

[/quote]Sure. I'm trying to get some Gold Dots to try and I'll also cast some of the lead bullets softer for the next round.[/quote]

I have a few boxes of Gold Dot .380 from when they were issue in the safe how many do you need to test
.
It is not the critic who counts
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8301
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: 380 ACP Bullet Gel Test- pic heavy

Post by TedH »

BlaineG wrote:
TedH wrote:
BrentD wrote:I look forward to hearing about those soft lead bullets. I've got a .380 that would be better off with lead than with the modern bullet I think.
Finally got around to trying soft lead bullets. I cast them from stick on wheel weights, and powder coated them like the others. Same power and charge weight as before too. I thought before I bothered with mixing up a batch of gel, I'd check and make sure the accuracy was acceptable. I'm not too demanding of the smallish gun, but want to make sure a center mass hit was likely at 25 yards. A fired 5 rounds from a sandbag rest at 25 yards. There was 1 hole in the target, not just the 8x11 paper, the entire backing cardboard piece that was about 3'x4'. :shock:

Since the first part of this report, that Walther was sold and replaced with a G42. While the little Glock shoots harder clip on wheel weight bullets quite well, apparently the polygonal rifling is not compatable with the very soft lead.

So that idea of soft lead is obviously scrapped for me.
Wow....Not in any way doubting your reporting, but that just don't sound right.....Were there signs leading in the rifling? Do you think that making them oversized would help?
No trace of lead. I had just cleaned the barrel before shooting those 5. I'm pretty dumbfounded myself. It may help to make them a little larger, but my mold drops them at .357", and I was only sizing to .356", so I don't think .001" will make that much difference.
NRA Life Member
Post Reply