Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
I've owned a few, all in .45 Colt, and my current example is a Short Rifle, with octagon barrel... i will say that there are sturdy, well-made and accurate guns, and a world of fun to shoot..
ENJOY !!
Regards
Buck
Life has a way of making the foreseeable that which never happens, and the unforeseeable, that which your life becomes...
I google and found very little. But what i found was promising - like navy arms took the best lots of uberti. I see now they are using the Japanese made Winchesters in their line up.
On the 24in.. how is the weight and balance? Not too nose heavy i trust.
Every importer says they "get the best of the lot" and it is all pretty much a bunch of hooey. They might get different "stuff" stamped on the barrel but you can get a 1 of 1000 or a total dud from any of them. I have a 45 Colt Navy Arms 73 from the the early 80s. The top flat on the barrel was messed up with a terrible wave in the flat and to top it off, the barrel was bent downward from breech to muzzle to where the mag tube put stress on the bottom of the muzzle. I got tired of it and put the barrel on V blocks in a knee mill and kept cranking .050" at a time until the barrel bent and that took over an hour and many many cranks. Slapped it back together and the sights are dead on now. The barrel was always accurate but never would shoot to sights. Still have the gun and like it ...now. So if Navy thinks they get the best of the lot, the picker was drunk that day.
To clarify - I am not saying navy arms said that. Just saying thats what folks were saying on other forums when i went looking for further information.
I google and found very little. But what i found was promising - like navy arms took the best lots of uberti. I see now they are using the Japanese made Winchesters in their line up.
On the 24in.. how is the weight and balance? Not too nose heavy i trust.
It is a little nose heavy, which is what you want for offhand shooting. Seems just right to me. Wish I could find a .22 levergun built just like it.
My take on the Navy Arms rifles is that they had a much better grade of wood in the stock, and the one You are getting surely fit's the bill. it look's great.
The new Navy Arms are built on current Winchester '73's and finished by Turnbull. people will line up to get one of these. Have Fun. http://navyarms.com/1873_rifles.html
.45colt wrote:My take on the Navy Arms rifles is that they had a much better grade of wood in the stock, and the one You are getting surely fit's the bill. it look's great.
The new Navy Arms are built on current Winchester '73's and finished by Turnbull. people will line up to get one of these. Have Fun. http://navyarms.com/1873_rifles.html
jnyork wrote:
Spaxspore wrote:good to know guys. Thanks!
I google and found very little. But what i found was promising - like navy arms took the best lots of uberti. I see now they are using the Japanese made Winchesters in their line up.
On the 24in.. how is the weight and balance? Not too nose heavy i trust.
It is a little nose heavy, which is what you want for offhand shooting. Seems just right to me. Wish I could find a .22 levergun built just like it.
Thanks for the insight guys; i really appreciate it.
I have a Uberti 1873 Winchester copy of the saddle ring carbine that I'm very satisfied with. Mines a 44 special.
It is a tack driver and the rear ladder sight, although not best made sights or the easiest to use, it is regulated to 200 grain bullets at 1200 FPS MV.
That is consistent with the originals were, as Uberti probably copied the sight from an original. THE WINCHESTER BOOK George Madis, he writes about how the sight markings were regulated to the intended load. I was surprised to read that and find it to be true on my copy.
I have original '73 Winchester rifles but always wanted a SRC. They were usually so beat up and high priced when I found them I could justify paying the price. So This little carbine fills the need. I compared it to an original that was owned by Capt. Jack Crawford, Chief of Scouts, side by side it was nearly identical.
i have a circa 1890s mod 1873 in 44-40 Winchester Musket. Its in too good of condition to risk shooting. You do not see a musket variation often.. i have handled it .. with its 30in barrel...
Centennial wrote:That is neat! I wonder how she shoots!
If we are speaking of the musket.. she shoots fine! I put 10rds of 44-40 cowboy action magtechs through it.. then decided it was not worth damaging and saved my pennies for the uberti posted in the OP.
that is amazing condition, especially for a 95 carbine. i have a nice [ but nothing like that nice ] carbine in 30/06 with the lyman 21 sight, that is a prized piece for me.
My Navy Arms 73 is a 24" octagon bbl. Deluxe Sporting Rifle in 44-40. Lord only knows how many rounds I've shot through it at SASS events and practice. Mostly Goex ffg and 200 RNFP that I cast. Has been a great rifle but something happened to the bore right over the dovetail cut for the forearm hanger. Doesn't hurt the accuracy though.
M. M. Wright, Sheriff, Green county Arkansas (1860)
Currently living my eternal life.
NRA Life
SASS
ITSASS