7.62x39, anyone partake?
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
7.62x39, anyone partake?
Just curious!
Quite like the little CZ 527 carbine chambered in it.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.
Nath.
Quite like the little CZ 527 carbine chambered in it.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.
Nath.
Psalm ch8.
Because I wish I could!
Because I wish I could!
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 5670
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:13 pm
- Location: DeeDee Snavely's Used Guns and Weapons
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Yes I like the 7.62x39 and someday I'd like to get a little boltie chambered for it as well. Preferably the CZ.
How's that for an answer?

How's that for an answer?


Nothing so needs reforming as other people's habits.
-Mark Twain
Proverbs 3:5; Philippians 4:13
Got to have a Jones for this
Jones for that
This running with the Joneses boy
Just ain't where it's at
-Mark Twain
Proverbs 3:5; Philippians 4:13
Got to have a Jones for this
Jones for that
This running with the Joneses boy
Just ain't where it's at
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Not interested,change the caliber to 6.5 Grendal and things change.
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Think of it as a .30-30 bolt action, the ballistics are similar.
And unlike the Mini-30, the CZ has the correct twist for Russian/Chinese ammo.
It's a mini-Mauser, and very handy.
And unlike the Mini-30, the CZ has the correct twist for Russian/Chinese ammo.
It's a mini-Mauser, and very handy.
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
I am not against it but haven't had anything chambered in it since I gave my last SKS to my son. Would make a good deer cartridge in a short action bolt gun. That CZ should be a good one.
- Buck Elliott
- Member Emeritus
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:15 pm
- Location: Halfway up Sheep Mountain -- Cody, Wyoming
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
So far, I have steadfastly resisted....
Regards
Buck
Life has a way of making the foreseeable that which never happens, and the unforeseeable, that which your life becomes...
Buck
Life has a way of making the foreseeable that which never happens, and the unforeseeable, that which your life becomes...
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
I just sold My CZ at the last Gun Show.While a handy little Rifle I have no need for it here. I still have 2 SKSs, 1 Russian and 1 Chinese.
Perry
Perry
Perry in Bangor----++++===Calif
- Borregos
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4756
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:40 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
I'm looking for a contender barrel in that calibre



Pete
Sometimes I wonder if it is worthwhile gnawing through the leather straps to get up in the morning..................
Sometimes I wonder if it is worthwhile gnawing through the leather straps to get up in the morning..................
- Griff
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 21173
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
- Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
I partook once. Still have a divot. Also left me with a strong emotional aversion.
Reminds me of a time in our history ... ah... nevermind.

Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93
There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93
There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Yupper , got two , one on a 95 mauser action an one on a 98 mauser action. Barreled them both myself , one with a Numrich barrel an one with an old Springfield barrel . Both shoot the 150-200 gr cast great .
I had to make a mag block to shorten well length and weld a little build up on extractor lip to grab rim for more reliable extraction but was fun projects !
I had to make a mag block to shorten well length and weld a little build up on extractor lip to grab rim for more reliable extraction but was fun projects !
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
I only have that caliber in a Colt light weight sporter that I have not shot in many moons. I suppose it's a good enough round for most things.
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
GRIFF -- perfectly understandable...seen them, but never had much interest in that cartridge...like the gun, but would prefer a different caliber...like a 30-30... :)Griff wrote:I partook once. Still have a divot. Also left me with a strong emotional aversion. :twisted: Reminds me of a time in our history ... ah... nevermind.
- El Chivo
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 3659
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:12 pm
- Location: Red River Gorge Area
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
I met a guy with one of those CZ carbines and he said it was very accurate. Nice size and appearance. I covet that gun, but it doesn't come in lefty.
I think you could compare that cartridge to .308 more closely than 30-30. Same case, spire point, and more capacity. I believe I read the .308 has more power because of the loads, but it's the same case as the 7.62. You might get some good info on Wikipedia, lots of gun nuts add to the knowledge base there.
I think you could compare that cartridge to .308 more closely than 30-30. Same case, spire point, and more capacity. I believe I read the .308 has more power because of the loads, but it's the same case as the 7.62. You might get some good info on Wikipedia, lots of gun nuts add to the knowledge base there.
"I'll tell you what living is. You get up when you feel like it. You fry yourself some eggs. You see what kind of a day it is."
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Handi-rifles are (or at least were) available in that chambering, for a nice way to use all that cheap ammo in an accurate and inexpensive firearm. Encore barrels or Contender barrels of course even better, for more money.
Otherwise - the .300 AAC Blackout is better (IMHO) - standard bore diameter of .308, uses the .223 case/bolt-face, and magazines, and runs factory loads from 220 grain subsonics to 125 grain mach-two's...
Otherwise - the .300 AAC Blackout is better (IMHO) - standard bore diameter of .308, uses the .223 case/bolt-face, and magazines, and runs factory loads from 220 grain subsonics to 125 grain mach-two's...

It's 2025 - "Cutesy Time is OVER....!" [Dan Bongino]
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
The 7.62x39 is only the same calibre as the 7.62x51 NATO/.308 round. The power is much, much higher.....I don't even care for the 30wcf argument....the short 30 has about a 120gr bullet.El Chivo wrote:I met a guy with one of those CZ carbines and he said it was very accurate. Nice size and appearance. I covet that gun, but it doesn't come in lefty.
I think you could compare that cartridge to .308 more closely than 30-30. Same case, spire point, and more capacity. I believe I read the .308 has more power because of the loads, but it's the same case as the 7.62. You might get some good info on Wikipedia, lots of gun nuts add to the knowledge base there.
The Rotten Fruit Always Hits The Ground First
Proud Life Member Of:
NRA
Second Amendment Foundation
Citizens Committee For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
DAV
Proud Life Member Of:
NRA
Second Amendment Foundation
Citizens Committee For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
DAV
-
- Levergunner 3.0
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:09 pm
- Location: Arequipa, Peru till 2020
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Howdy
Been a partaker since the Chicom SKS was selling for about $68. Have had at least 7 and still have my origonal Chicom and 2 Yugo's and lots of that Bear ammo bought when it was 7 cents. I reload it also with the Lee 155 GC and 1680.
Mike in ILL
Been a partaker since the Chicom SKS was selling for about $68. Have had at least 7 and still have my origonal Chicom and 2 Yugo's and lots of that Bear ammo bought when it was 7 cents. I reload it also with the Lee 155 GC and 1680.
Mike in ILL
A sinner saved by FAITH in the Blood of Jesus Christ &teaching God´s Word in Peru. John 3:36
Tanker 71-74 NRA Life Ready to Defend the Constitution from enemies within and without.
Tanker 71-74 NRA Life Ready to Defend the Constitution from enemies within and without.
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
What Blaine said. I don't think it's even up to .30-30 heat much less .308. That said, it's certainly useful within its limits, so have at it and have a ball (no pun).
Oly

Oly
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
In the 90's, I bought a Chinese SKS for $100 in a department store. I bought 1000 rd case of Russian ammo for another $100 at a gun show. It is the only autoloading rifle I own. I don't really like it, but I don't have much in it. The CZ would be much more accurate and useful for hunting or target shooting. I agree that the round is not fully equal to the 30-30 and not even in the same ballpark as the .308. I am very curious about the new AR adaptation that RRA has in this round.
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Paco has one or had one, he did a review of it that I think is on gunblast.com. His thought at the time was to have a centerfire rifle that he didn't have to reload for since the imported ammo is so cheap.
Remember though not all 7.62's are the same. While American .30-30, .308, and .30-06, etc shoot a .308 dia bullet, the 7.62X39 shoots a .311 bullet like the .303 British does. This might be an advantage for Nath.
Personally I think it would be a great cartridge on a great platform. CZ uses the same size action for 7.62X39 that they do for .223 & .22 Hornet. It's a handy little carbine with a set trigger.
Handloading for it would really bring out it's full potential.
Remember though not all 7.62's are the same. While American .30-30, .308, and .30-06, etc shoot a .308 dia bullet, the 7.62X39 shoots a .311 bullet like the .303 British does. This might be an advantage for Nath.
Personally I think it would be a great cartridge on a great platform. CZ uses the same size action for 7.62X39 that they do for .223 & .22 Hornet. It's a handy little carbine with a set trigger.
Handloading for it would really bring out it's full potential.
If you're gonna be stupid ya gotta be tough-
Isiah 55:8&9
It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled.
Isiah 55:8&9
It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled.
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Maybe you should actually own one of these rifles that shoot these rounds.El Chivo wrote:I met a guy with one of those CZ carbines and he said it was very accurate. Nice size and appearance. I covet that gun, but it doesn't come in lefty.
I think you could compare that cartridge to .308 more closely than 30-30. Same case, spire point, and more capacity. I believe I read the .308 has more power because of the loads, but it's the same case as the 7.62. You might get some good info on Wikipedia, lots of gun nuts add to the knowledge base there.
I do and the 762X39 is not as close to the 30/30 as the 308 Win is to the 30/06.
And none of those rounds are off by any great monumental greatnness ,they are all about the
same (not like the 38 S&W verses the 357Mag) just know its limitations and don't expect more.
Bob
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
The cartridge fits the rifle and it's intended uses. I keep several around, along with a few 5 gallon buckets of ammo.
In a bolt action? Too light for deer and not flat enough for varmints. Back to my first sentence.-----------Sixgun
In a bolt action? Too light for deer and not flat enough for varmints. Back to my first sentence.-----------Sixgun
This is Boring & Mindless……Wasted Energy
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Hey El Chivo, maybe this'll strike yer fancy! http://www.centuryarms.biz/proddetail.a ... =RI1975K-NEl Chivo wrote:I met a guy with one of those CZ carbines and he said it was very accurate. Nice size and appearance. I covet that gun, but it doesn't come in lefty.
I think you could compare that cartridge to .308 more closely than 30-30. Same case, spire point, and more capacity. I believe I read the .308 has more power because of the loads, but it's the same case as the 7.62. You might get some good info on Wikipedia, lots of gun nuts add to the knowledge base there.
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Looked at Contender barrels once and it seemed that you needed an encore for this caliber,but the Contender would accept the 300 Whisper.
-
- Levergunner 3.0
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 10:31 am
- Location: East Texas
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Nath....I have never shot a 7.62 X 39 but I have listened to them for hours.....the CZ is a neat rifle just not the caliber I would want to own.....
rick
rick
- El Chivo
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 3659
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:12 pm
- Location: Red River Gorge Area
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
slimster, thanks a bunch, great choices there...
"I'll tell you what living is. You get up when you feel like it. You fry yourself some eggs. You see what kind of a day it is."
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Thank you Slimster I'll have to check those out myself.
If you're gonna be stupid ya gotta be tough-
Isiah 55:8&9
It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled.
Isiah 55:8&9
It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled.
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
I have a CZ 527 CARBINE in 7.62x39.
Mags are a little pricy if you ask me.
I think it's a sweet little bolt rifle.
There are hunting round in this caliber I would hesitate using on a deer at 100 yard or less.
Mags are a little pricy if you ask me.
I think it's a sweet little bolt rifle.
There are hunting round in this caliber I would hesitate using on a deer at 100 yard or less.
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Do you mean you would use it on a deer below 100yds? Thanksreg255 wrote:I have a CZ 527 CARBINE in 7.62x39.
Mags are a little pricy if you ask me.
I think it's a sweet little bolt rifle.
There are hunting round in this caliber I would hesitate using on a deer at 100 yard or less.

Rick, can you ellaborate as to why you would not want to own? Is it due to it's history?jumbeaux wrote:Nath....I have never shot a 7.62 X 39 but I have listened to them for hours.....the CZ is a neat rifle just not the caliber I would want to own.....
rick
N.
Psalm ch8.
Because I wish I could!
Because I wish I could!
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Killed a couple of deer with 7.62x39 out of a Norinco sks. Furthest was about 70 yards. Them deer did not know they wern't killed by a 30-30.
-
- Levergunner 3.0
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 10:31 am
- Location: East Texas
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Nath I guess I was being somewhat narrow minded....the caliber is reasonable to shoot because of the price and availability...the CZ's are great rifles...I have a couple in rimfire......I guess the past probably has alot to do with my "hang up".....what I listened to where not CZ's......they were SKS's and AK's......
rck
rck
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 2511
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:24 pm
- Location: wasilla, alaska and bozeman, montana
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
i have the CZ527 in 7.62 x 39 and is a ball to shoot. very lightweight, well balanced, youngster friendly, great trigger, very accurate. and i have picked up lots of non corrosive ammo very cheap so for me it is a good caliber for teaching kids, and beginner adults, along with the 30/30 .
with the 30/30 i start them with reduced loads, and work up.
there is commercial, heavier bullet, expanding ammo for the little carbine to make it adequate for deer and caribou and maybe larger game close up in a survival situation.
also have an old russian sks folder, that is very accurate......and an AR carbine in the same round.
with the 30/30 i start them with reduced loads, and work up.
there is commercial, heavier bullet, expanding ammo for the little carbine to make it adequate for deer and caribou and maybe larger game close up in a survival situation.
also have an old russian sks folder, that is very accurate......and an AR carbine in the same round.
cable
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4145
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:34 am
- Location: north of Palacios about 1400 miles
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Theres a CZ with a Leupold small variable at the LGS for $700 or so.
30/30 Winchester: Not accurate enough fer varmints, barely adequate for small deer; BUT In a 10" to 14" barrelled pistol; is good for moose/elk to 200 yards; ground squirrels to 300 metres
250 Savage... its what the 223 wishes it could be...!
250 Savage... its what the 223 wishes it could be...!
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
My USAF buddy lives in Manassas, Virginia and hunts on private farm land for deer. He typically knocks down 3 - 5 does each season with his CZ 7.62 X 39 carbine. Winchester Power Point ammo and Simmons scope. None got away. For a non-lever the CZ is a keeper!
TR
TR
Fire Up the Grill - Hunting is NOT Catch & Release!
- dracothered
- Levergunner 1.0
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:50 pm
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Have me one of them there Chinese Paratrooper SKS's that is real nice to handle. Only thing I don't like about it is the trigger.
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
never really considered it...
I like the traditional hunting rounds and cowboy stuff....
I like the traditional hunting rounds and cowboy stuff....
LETS GO SHOOT'N BOYS
- dracothered
- Levergunner 1.0
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:50 pm
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
If you keep it within effective range for what you are using, dead is dead...RIHMFIRE wrote:never really considered it...
I like the traditional hunting rounds and cowboy stuff....
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
I got rid of the SKS and the AK variant I had and bought a Winchester 94 30/30 .never looked back. Do not miss the AK kinda miss the SKS but I would not buy either again. Perfectly satisfied with the lever gun and would not feel under gunned in a gun fight with one if it ever come to that.
A gun is like a parachute: If you need one and don't have one, you won't be needing one again.
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
I also have a CZ527 in 7.62 caliber. I found the Russian ammo not as accurate in it as others. It is a handy little rifle (carbine). They use a 1-9 twist and require a .311 bullet. I have been wanting to develop a load for a heavier bullet to take advantage of the quicker twist. They are nice little rifles. Check them out and see what you think if possible. ATB
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
In the 1990's, my buddies in Michigan hunted deer with their SKS carbines. This cartridge was effective at the distances they hunted. Since then many have moved out of state and I lost track of them.
TR
TR
Fire Up the Grill - Hunting is NOT Catch & Release!
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
I have a CZ in 7.62x39. I like it. It shoots cheap Silver Bear into 1" groups & Hornady SST ammo into less. Nice crisp light trigger. Mild recoil & cheap to feed accurately make it not worth the time to reload for it. Any of my friends that shoot it want to buy it.
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
I have a Mini-30 and it is fine for 75 yards or less. I wouldn't want to use it on anything other than deer or smaller. Based on the bullet weight and velocity, it just isn't as powerful as a .30-30. I bought it for something to use on pigs at 25 to 50 yards, and have yet to use it for that. My leverguns do the job better.
D. Brian Casady
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
piller, What happened?
Why did the idea not manifest itself?
Why did the idea not manifest itself?
-
- Levergunner
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:31 pm
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
I'd certainly have to agree with Piller. The .308" bore of his Mini Thirty does give him greater flexibility with bullet selection over the .311, but there is only so much gas going into that little tank. If good marksmanship is achieveable, the big magazine has its advantages, as a lot of a little will add up to enough. Engage, advance, reengage repeating as necessary: the formula for the successful big game shotgun hunter.
Something that has not been directly addressed here is the sight height above bore in these auto loaders. A tall set of sights necessitated by pistons or gas systems turns even the .223/5.56 into a rainbow trajectory when compared to a scope at 1.5" or less. It is a cartridge that approximates .30-30 ballistics (pre lever evolution ammunition) and is done a great disservice by the height of its sights. In a system like the Mini Thirty is has its best chance ballistically in a self loading rifle. The majority of the cheap ammo is .311 so go figure on that one.
I would not go so far as to say my lever gun would be a best choice for a fight or that I wouldn't feel under gunned . It doesn't strike me as a fun time to stand my ground with something I can empty in a flash ('73) or only holds eight rounds ('86). The single round reloading is just too slow, maybe with an 1860 Henry and some sort of speed loader tubes it's starting to look up. The three seconds it takes to rock, lock and rack another 20,30,40,... into place just can't be matched. Even with the edge of a more accurate weapon and even marksmanship being in your favor, the volume of fire generated by opponents makes this a sunny day solution in a fluid gunfight. All that said, I admire your guts and style sir.
Something that has not been directly addressed here is the sight height above bore in these auto loaders. A tall set of sights necessitated by pistons or gas systems turns even the .223/5.56 into a rainbow trajectory when compared to a scope at 1.5" or less. It is a cartridge that approximates .30-30 ballistics (pre lever evolution ammunition) and is done a great disservice by the height of its sights. In a system like the Mini Thirty is has its best chance ballistically in a self loading rifle. The majority of the cheap ammo is .311 so go figure on that one.
I would not go so far as to say my lever gun would be a best choice for a fight or that I wouldn't feel under gunned . It doesn't strike me as a fun time to stand my ground with something I can empty in a flash ('73) or only holds eight rounds ('86). The single round reloading is just too slow, maybe with an 1860 Henry and some sort of speed loader tubes it's starting to look up. The three seconds it takes to rock, lock and rack another 20,30,40,... into place just can't be matched. Even with the edge of a more accurate weapon and even marksmanship being in your favor, the volume of fire generated by opponents makes this a sunny day solution in a fluid gunfight. All that said, I admire your guts and style sir.
-
- Levergunner
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:31 pm
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
Have you thought about the Barnes TTSX 130gr? I believe you could push it hard and still get weight retention. I like it in the .300 WM @ 3300fps.piller wrote:I have a Mini-30 and it is fine for 75 yards or less. I wouldn't want to use it on anything other than deer or smaller. Based on the bullet weight and velocity, it just isn't as powerful as a .30-30. I bought it for something to use on pigs at 25 to 50 yards, and have yet to use it for that. My leverguns do the job better.
Last edited by Forrest Halley on Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
I'd like to have a Mini 30 rebarreled into 6.5mm Grendel, but I have limited desire to own one in the AK round. My AKs and SKSs do that just fine.
Oly
Oly
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
you are on the path of true Enlightenment!
I stole this quote from...................
His Holiness the Dali Lama.
I stole this quote from...................
His Holiness the Dali Lama.
- horsesoldier03
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:32 pm
- Location: Kansas
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
I picked up a few of them over in Iraq. I kept them around for nothing more than to reinforce to my Soldiers that we had the superior weapon (M4/M16). Several would argue the fact until we finally had a day to burn off some ammo on a range. I also happened to have a sheet of 1/4" steel that we were using for uparmor kits for our vehicles. My M4 with green tip ball ammo penetrated it just fine. The AK ammo would splatter and leave a lead smear and that is about it. Accuracy was extremely poor. I am sure it would be a better round if the ammo wasnt so cheap.
Back to what sixgun said, it does well for its given application, provided there is no barrier between you and your intended target.
That being said, quality ammo out of a CZ would be apples to oranges from a used AK in Iraq.
Back to what sixgun said, it does well for its given application, provided there is no barrier between you and your intended target.
That being said, quality ammo out of a CZ would be apples to oranges from a used AK in Iraq.
Gun Control is not about guns, it is about control!
Re: 7.62x39, anyone partake?
The place I had planned to go ended up having no hogs. Someone got there before me with dogs and the hogs moved on and haven't moved back yet.Mescalero wrote:piller, What happened?
Why did the idea not manifest itself?
D. Brian Casady
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost