Movies - "Australia", why ....

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
J Miller
Member Emeritus
Posts: 14890
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Not in IL no more ... :)

Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by J Miller »

I just finished watching the movie Australia. Not knowing the complete detailed history of the country I took it for entertainment only and enjoyed it.

Kind of like American westerns, nothing or very little factual about them, just an enjoyable couple hours of entertainment.

I've read comments from Australians on several forums and not one liked it. Some went to the extreme of apologizing for it.

My questions for our Australian members is simple: what is it about this movie that makes you dislike it so much?

Joe
***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts ;) .***
holahead
Levergunner
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:38 pm

Re: OT: Australia, why ....

Post by holahead »

My wife and just watched it this past Saturday night. I thought it was a good movie. My wife cried like a baby in parts of it. I too watched it as entertainment but felt like it was a good movie. Didn't they have some kind of apology at the beginning of the movie? I really like the little boy he was funny. Reminded me of my son.
Travis Morgan
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:59 pm
Contact:

Re: OT: Australia, why ....

Post by Travis Morgan »

I absolutely hated it.
Hunter Ed. instructor
NRA Basic pistol Inst.
NRA Personal protection inst.
NRA Range safety officer


Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. Psalm 1
User avatar
FWiedner
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 9:50 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: OT: Australia, why ....

Post by FWiedner »

It wasn't at all what I thought it would be.

I expected a documentary or a historical dramatization, but it seemed like a slapstick comedy. Then as the story developed, I realized it was a city-girl goes country and saves the ranch while other stuff happens movie.

Once I stopped expecting something from it, it was a pretty good movie.

:)
Government office attracts the power-mad, yet it's people who just want to be left alone to live life on their own terms who are considered dangerous.

History teaches that it's a small window in which people can fight back before it is too dangerous to fight back.
Travis Morgan
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:59 pm
Contact:

Re: OT: Australia, why ....

Post by Travis Morgan »

There was some much CGI stuff and special effects that I just wanted to vomit.
Hunter Ed. instructor
NRA Basic pistol Inst.
NRA Personal protection inst.
NRA Range safety officer


Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. Psalm 1
User avatar
waz
Levergunner
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:22 pm
Location: Toowoomba, Australia

Re: OT: Australia, why ....

Post by waz »

I'm fairly neutral towards it. I found it to be very cliched (if that's a word). It was more like a 3hr tourism ad with a couple of funnies thrown in.

I thought Brandon Walters was excellent and very nearly saved it single handedly.

We have a social condition here called the "tall poppy syndrome". Generally - if someone is too successful, we take great pleasure in knocking them down a peg or two. Personally, I try not to subscribe to this. For me it comes down to the attitude of the successful person. If they become arrogant, sure, perhaps they need a reality check. But if they remain humble in their success, more power to them.

Waz
gak
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1747
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:35 pm
Location: Sunny Aridzona

Re: OT: Australia, why ....

Post by gak »

I liked it well enough also though the special effects (war and other scenes) were unfortunate and a distraction from what could have been a quality epic piece. I like Jackman and usually Kidman, but thought she in particular over (or under?) acted. Not equating the two otherwise, but similar disappointment to how I felt about Flags of Our Father--especially re the effects, though generally a huge Eastwood fan (directing and acting). Thought it was going to be the ultimate Iwo/war movie--the "Private Ryan of the Pacific"--and it wasn't quite (though I admit can't name another--no, not Sands Of...though a good yarn), though it was generally a good go. Not as bad effects as the Japanese Zero scenes from Pearl Harbor! Windtalkers was another missed opp' in this regard. I guess naval fleets, tens of thousands of fighting men and historic plane squadrons are hard to come by these days in Hollywood, thus the necessary--but obvious--use of computers. Speaking of WWII in the Pacific, Speilberg/Hanks "War in the Pacific" HBO series due out in March--supposedly to Ryan and Band of Brothers level. Hooray and long time coming! Think--and hope--Spielberg will avoid or minimize the computer-generted stuff somehow.
Didn't mean to hijack if I did.
Pop Watts
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 383
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: OT: Australia, why ....

Post by Pop Watts »

The hype that came before the movie was amazing. It was being billed as the great epic story of Australia 12 months before it was released. It was just a movie with a very thin plot, average acting and poor effects.

I hated the movie and went into more detail about that on a previous post.

Pop.
User avatar
Jacko
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 12:33 am
Location: Morayfield Qld Australia

Re: OT: Australia, why ....

Post by Jacko »

I was doing my missus a favour when I bought her the DVD , sadly I thought it was one of the worst films I have ever seen , she enjoyed it though

I cringed the first time Drover said "Crikey" turned over the glass thus challenging all and sundry to the bar fight. I ran and hid every other time in the movie he repeated "Crikey", its overblown cliche and Hugh Jackman and Nicole Kidman knew it - The scene with Nicole Kidmans characters first night in the Aussie bush was predictable garbage - when Jackman flexed up and poured the bucket of water overhimself while still half dressed I got up and poored myself a stout Port. I knew what the rest of the movie was going to be like .

I doubt any of the actors other than David Gulipill and the young aboriginal lad put in any sort of effort into there parts . If they edited all the bad acting , cringe and cliche out of the movie you'd get an entertaining hour 20 minute movie.

They could have expanded on so much in that film and set it up for a sequel . They missed opportunities in developing the bad guy's character , why the heck Hollywood always portrays Aussie badguy's like this twit I'll never know - they basically copied the baddie's character from "Quigly Downunder". They should have gone more into the Drover characters wife perhaps starting the movie shortly before her death

Not many folks, Aussie's included know that the Japanese dropped more bombs on Darwin on February 19th 1942 than on Pearl Harbour and over 300 people died. In fact the Japs bombed Darwin 60 odd more times. They could have given us more of a history lesson on the ensuing Military stuff up that left barely a soldier in and around Darwin immediately after the bombing , made more of a scene out of the Japs landing on the mission island , more on David Gulipill and the young boys journey and actually ensured Jackman and Kidman had a good script to work off - it was obvious they thought it was overblown cliche and a mis-infomercial

regards Jacko

PS The scene where the aboriginal fella shot the Roo from the truck cracked me up and the scenery was spectacular so it wasn't all bad .
the telegraphist
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 442
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 6:35 am
Location: Queensland Australia

Re: OT: Australia, why ....

Post by the telegraphist »

The movie was total garbage. Sanitising a nations supposed guilt towards the indegenous owners. The owners of which did nothing of this land. They are a dying race, unless they can salvage through whatever means their self respect and drive off the scourge of grog they are doomed. They have been thrown millions of taxpayers dollars, nothing changes, they still abuse the womenfolk and children, they deserve nothing but scorn, those that choose the traditional life are to be lauded and they survive and I will give to them willingly.
GUN CONTROL IS HITTING YOUR TARGET
User avatar
gundownunder
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1449
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: Perth. Western Australia

Re: OT: Australia, why ....

Post by gundownunder »

The movie was shot in the Kimberleys but most of the scenery was altered and looked nothing like the real thing.
Kidmans acting was about equal to a straw doll with a broom up its backside.
Back then no pub would have allowed a woman in the public bar let alone serving her booze, whether she was a drover or not.
The kid with his hand up to stop the cattle was about as believable as Crocodile dundee stopping a water buffalo.
The whole thing was cliched and unreal.
A bit like a poor mans attempt to make a movie like "Titanic" or "Pearl Harbor"
Bob
***********************************
You have got to love democracy-
It lets you choose who your dictator is going to be.
***********************************
Travis Morgan
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:59 pm
Contact:

Re: OT: Australia, why ....

Post by Travis Morgan »

gundownunder wrote: The kid with his hand up to stop the cattle was about as believable as Crocodile dundee stopping a water buffalo.
The whole thing was cliched and unreal.
A bit like a poor mans attempt to make a movie like "Titanic" or "Pearl Harbor"
Why in HELL would a person drive cattle up and over a Mesa anyway? :lol: And did anyone notice they were never driven UP the mesa? They just appeared there?

When Hugh Jackman started going all "Flashdance" with the bucket of water, I thought it was turning into a gay porno.
Hunter Ed. instructor
NRA Basic pistol Inst.
NRA Personal protection inst.
NRA Range safety officer


Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. Psalm 1
User avatar
Buck Elliott
Member Emeritus
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:15 pm
Location: Halfway up Sheep Mountain -- Cody, Wyoming

Re: OT: Australia, why ....

Post by Buck Elliott »

Looking at it as pure entertainment ............... It wasn't.

Not as bad as some -- not as good as it should have been.

We just have to accept the fact that HollyWierd does NOT make major motion pictures targeted at our particular demographic. They haven't since we were 17.
Regards

Buck

Life has a way of making the foreseeable that which never happens, and the unforeseeable, that which your life becomes...
User avatar
Paladin
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1932
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:55 am
Location: Not Working (much)

Re: OT: Australia, why ....

Post by Paladin »

Buck Elliott wrote:Looking at it as pure entertainment ............... It wasn't.

Not as bad as some -- not as good as it should have been.

We just have to accept the fact that HollyWierd does NOT make major motion pictures targeted at our particular demographic. They haven't since we were 17.
+1, You should never forget Hollywood has no contact with reality.
It is not the critic who counts
don Tomás
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 961
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:42 am
Location: Kalifornia Sierra Nevada

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by don Tomás »

A history lesson it wasn't. My wife enjoyed the movie, Nicole Kidman in those riding pants is what made the movie for me... :D

Image
Tom

Image

'A Man's got to have a code...
I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted and I won't be laid a hand on.
I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them."

-John Bernard Books. Jan. 22, 1901
Leverluver
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 4:02 pm
Location: WY

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by Leverluver »

I don't think I've ever seen a Kidman movie that wasn't a chick flick. I get the most upset when a great opportunity was missed. This one missed just like "Pearl Harbor" missed. The thought of so much money going into making such a film and not come out with something is beyond disappointing.
User avatar
Borregos
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4756
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:40 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by Borregos »

My wife enjoyed it :D
Pete
Sometimes I wonder if it is worthwhile gnawing through the leather straps to get up in the morning..................
Bruce Scott
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1086
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:36 pm
Location: Western Australia

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by Bruce Scott »

:oops: ...I haven't seen it. Some friends thought it was great. As it turns out, the positive comments came from ex Brits and Kiwis
Image
User avatar
gundownunder
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1449
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: Perth. Western Australia

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by gundownunder »

Hey Bruce, it is entertaining and well worth a look now that it's on Foxtel.

Travis Morgan, they are not mesas they are on. Over millions of years water has cut gorges into the landscape, just like the grand canyon. In the wet season millions of gallons of water roar through there. In the mornings and evenings when the sun hits the gorge walls they light up with some of the most vibrant colors you could ever see.

I actually like Hugh Jackman as an actor, with the right script he could have made the "drover" fantastic.
Bob
***********************************
You have got to love democracy-
It lets you choose who your dictator is going to be.
***********************************
Travis Morgan
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:59 pm
Contact:

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by Travis Morgan »

Call it whatever ya want, but they show it as a huge plateau; you may have some sort of degree in land features, but I know a plateau from a gorge.
Hunter Ed. instructor
NRA Basic pistol Inst.
NRA Personal protection inst.
NRA Range safety officer


Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. Psalm 1
dirtcowboy
Levergunner
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:17 pm
Location: Eureka, MT.

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by dirtcowboy »

don Tomás wrote:A history lesson it wasn't. My wife enjoyed the movie, Nicole Kidman in those riding pants is what made the movie for me... :D

Image

This is the correct answer!!!!!
User avatar
gundownunder
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1449
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: Perth. Western Australia

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by gundownunder »

Call it whatever ya want, but they show it as a huge plateau; you may have some sort of degree in land features, but I know a plateau from a gorge.
Of course you know a plateau from a gorge :roll:

But I live a little closer to the north of Australia than you do and dont need
some sort of degree in land features
and you were not paying attention when I said,
The movie was shot in the Kimberleys but most of the scenery was altered and looked nothing like the real thing.
I've never seen the Grand Canyon except on tv or the movies, so can someone tell me if you would have to climb up onto a mesa in order to fall into the Grand Canyon?

You have a nice day Travis, and thanks for the pelosi canning, its always helpful to be reminded that there are people like you in the world :D
Bob
***********************************
You have got to love democracy-
It lets you choose who your dictator is going to be.
***********************************
aussie
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:49 am

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by aussie »

Australians tend to do that type of thing Joe. It was meant as entertainment, not a history lesson or documentary. But some Australians went to the length of apologising for it, even though they had no hand in the making of the movie. Maybe it was meant to make them seem more important than they really are. After all, it is only their opinion....who really cares. Me? I enjoyed it for what it was......entertainment. Loved the kid, thought he was great.
aussie.
rafter-7
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 471
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 4:32 pm
Location: North Dakota

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by rafter-7 »

Australia, It was alright kinda slow at times but it was worth the price of the rental fee..... Now the movie "Fargo" the Sundance film that won all the awards about 10 years ago was an embarresment/slap in the face to the whole upper mid west and we still have not lived it down!!! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: I invite you to rent it and see what a worthless movie is all about! two hours I'll never get back.

^
7
Travis Morgan
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:59 pm
Contact:

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by Travis Morgan »

gundownunder,

No, you wouldn't have to climb a mesa to see the grand canyon. That wouldn't really make any sense, anyway; if you know what a canyon is. Or a Mesa.
Hunter Ed. instructor
NRA Basic pistol Inst.
NRA Personal protection inst.
NRA Range safety officer


Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. Psalm 1
User avatar
FWiedner
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 9:50 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by FWiedner »

rafter-7 wrote:Australia, It was alright kinda slow at times but it was worth the price of the rental fee..... Now the movie "Fargo" the Sundance film that won all the awards about 10 years ago was an embarresment/slap in the face to the whole upper mid west and we still have not lived it down!!! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: I invite you to rent it and see what a worthless movie is all about! two hours I'll never get back.

^
7
Granted, "Fargo" was a slow mover, but it did introduce a new utility for wood-chippers.

:wink: :mrgreen:
Government office attracts the power-mad, yet it's people who just want to be left alone to live life on their own terms who are considered dangerous.

History teaches that it's a small window in which people can fight back before it is too dangerous to fight back.
Travis Morgan
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:59 pm
Contact:

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by Travis Morgan »

FWiedner wrote:
rafter-7 wrote:Australia, It was alright kinda slow at times but it was worth the price of the rental fee..... Now the movie "Fargo" the Sundance film that won all the awards about 10 years ago was an embarresment/slap in the face to the whole upper mid west and we still have not lived it down!!! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: I invite you to rent it and see what a worthless movie is all about! two hours I'll never get back.

^
7
Granted, "Fargo" was a slow mover, but it did introduce a new utility for wood-chippers.

:wink: :mrgreen:
That's one of those movies I hate, but I've watched it a hundred times!
Hunter Ed. instructor
NRA Basic pistol Inst.
NRA Personal protection inst.
NRA Range safety officer


Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. Psalm 1
Lawyer Daggit
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:38 pm

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by Lawyer Daggit »

The movie was too long, and because they accepted money from a tourist commission of one state or other, they went overboard on tourist shots.

As a bit of good clean entertainment, an 'Australian western' if you like, it was OK, but of this genre I preferred Crocodile Dundee.
mescalero1
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4923
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:08 am
Location: Arizona headed for New Mexico

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by mescalero1 »

gundownunder,
Yes,
It's a long steady climb to the rim of the canyon, then you see a canyon cut by a river.
It is not as spectacular as you may have been led to believe.
rafter-7
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 471
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 4:32 pm
Location: North Dakota

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by rafter-7 »

Travis Morgan wrote:
FWiedner wrote:
rafter-7 wrote:Australia, It was alright kinda slow at times but it was worth the price of the rental fee..... Now the movie "Fargo" the Sundance film that won all the awards about 10 years ago was an embarresment/slap in the face to the whole upper mid west and we still have not lived it down!!! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: I invite you to rent it and see what a worthless movie is all about! two hours I'll never get back.

^
7
Granted, "Fargo" was a slow mover, but it did introduce a new utility for wood-chippers.

:wink: :mrgreen:
That's one of those movies I hate, but I've watched it a hundred times!
Thier Norwiegian "Broke" was so phony and the acting protrayed us as inbisiles. Kinda like broke back mountain is to the cowboy way of life. I will NEVER watch that flick just due to princibles

^
Travis Morgan
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:59 pm
Contact:

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by Travis Morgan »

rafter-7 wrote:.....and the acting protrayed us as inbisiles. Kinda like broke back mountain is to the cowboy way of life. I will NEVER watch that flick just due to princibles

^


"Imbeciles" and "Principles".
Hunter Ed. instructor
NRA Basic pistol Inst.
NRA Personal protection inst.
NRA Range safety officer


Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. Psalm 1
User avatar
Pathfinder09
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 472
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Oregon Territory moved to upstate NY

Re: Movies - "Australia", why ....

Post by Pathfinder09 »

I really appreciate the comments from our friends "Down Under".

To me the movie was mediocure. Just like anything out of Hollywood ,it is all hype and bares very little resemblence of reality. Only once in a while does a stellar movie shine through.

As an example I'm a huge Clive Cussler fan and have read most of his books. I have personnal autographed copies. There have been very few movies based on his books. The latest one was Sahara. It was all hype, I waited a year until it finally came out. I stood in line the day it opened. It sucked. It beared very little resemblence to the book. In fact Clive Cussler sued the movie, because it was not the book he wrote. So there you are you buy your ticket and take your chances.

:(
Image
Post Reply