http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/ ... 28902.html

+1,000!meanc wrote:Don't blame the kids.
Blame the parents 110 %.
Well, I am old (as Jeremy points out), but not that old. Being born in 1964, I was too young for most of the "flower-power" era!mad mucus wrote:Ysabel Kid's comment on...
"Don't blame the kids.
Blame the parents 110 %."
+1,000! ............
_________________
Mate.... we don't live in the 50's anymore; society and technology have changed.... y'all did as your parents wished during the "FLOWER POWER" years, eh?![]()
Mucus
Too true. I remember a little old British lady saying something to the effect of, "The problem with parents today is that they are too concerned with being friends with their children, whereas back in my day we couldn't care less whether they liked us or not." The implication being that you do a disservice to the children by not being a parent to them.TedH wrote:Many parents these days are just plain too LAZY to follow through with what it takes to disipline a child properly. They are more concerned about themselves. It takes a lot of time spent with a child to raise them right, IMHO. Too many parents just won't do it for the effort it takes.
Nothing much in this world replaces experiences - often earned the hard way. I'd be concerned too. You sold like a loving father - which in and of itself is the best gift you can give them. They are already rich.mad mucus wrote:G'day Ysabel Kid..... I too am of the 1964 vintage and I grew with similar values.
I have six kids, the four oldest aged 17-22yrs, all left school, work full-time and still live at home with rules and guidlines. Their greenness, gullability, and lack of "street smarts" is a concern to me.
Mucus