
This is the front view.

This thing rides up and down in that square hole we morticed earlier on.
Charlie wrote:Here she is starting to look like a Rifle. I have already shot it as it is.
I will not conture the Action or Lever untill I get the Butt Stock made and installed.
Shucking the spent shell.Alphawolf45 wrote:Youve given enough pictures that a determined fellow could build that same gun. I note that I do not know what ejects the spent cartridge after pulled out by the extractor..And I dont know what else might trip up a clever fellow.. I AINT gonna try to build one of'em , you'all might laugh at mebut i am just saying- Those are some good pictures Charlie. And you got some serious skills my friend....
No dust cover.AmBraCol wrote:Charlie, it has been many years since I had a chance to play with a toggle link rifle. Way back when I traded into a beat up wreck of a Model 73. I notice that your toggle pins are much more robust than the '73. Even more robust than my 'smith made them when he tightened up the action by reaming the holes and fitting new pins. What other differences are there between your Volcanic and the 73? Will the Volcanic have a "dust cover" like the '73 did? (I suspect not) Maybe I'll get inspired to get back to work on my CVA Kentucky. NO WHERE NEAR the class of what you're doing, but there's something about fitting wood to metal that stirs us. Thanks for sharing this build with us. It is great to see we still have men amongst us who can build a weapon from scratch.
The dust cover on the '73 was a piece that slid back and forth on a dovetail on the top of the receiver. This piece didn't really effect the proper functioning of the weapon and I've seen several that were missing this piece and still serviceable. Basically it's to keep "stuff" from falling into the top of the receiver and tying up the gun.Alan Wood wrote:Looks like youll be done pretty soon. Very nice work.
For those of us not familiar with the 73's and 76's is the dust cover that has been mentioned on them for the ejection port?
Alan Wood wrote:As usuall very nicely done! I'm suprised that the side plates need to be that much larger.
Yeah, I need to go back and explane that. give me a little time to get some pictures and I'll get back to ye.Ben_Rumson wrote:"Lucky on the fit"Those things fit like socks on a Rooster...Charlie, did I miss something, What is holding the tangs into the frame?
Charlie wrote:Alan Wood wrote:As usuall very nicely done! I'm suprised that the side plates need to be that much larger.
.0001 to .0002, Count dem decimels, that an't much metal.
You got it Man.AmBraCol wrote:Twist barrel to load/unload? Beautiful piece there.
Charlie wrote:A little break from the Volcanic.
This was my previous project. It's a 40 S+W, single shot Boot Pistol. I made everything you see here, I even Rifled the barrel. I can hit a Tennis Ball at 20 yards with it, (off the sand bags).
Ron Smith is the engraver.
Uh - that'd be about equivalent of a 38-40. If I understand Charles' post rightly, it's chambered in 40 S&W (40 Short and Weak)44magHunter wrote:Wow. That is pretty neat. About what would the power of that round amount to? (compared to any modern-day cartridges.)