Am I right in saying.....

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
Rifleman336
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 12:17 pm
Location: Dayton, Ohio

Am I right in saying.....

Post by Rifleman336 »

I was on another board and someone brought up a question on the .35 Remington. Am I right in saying that their no way to make it an Auckley Improved because its too close pressure wise to the casings limit or the rifles?


Rifleman 336
Never bite off more than you can chew.
bogus bill
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:40 pm
Location: utah

Re: Am I right in saying.....

Post by bogus bill »

Wasnt that cartridge used a lot in those early auto remington and winchesters? Probley due to those actions no one wanted to mess with the work involved with getting them to work. I always was tempted years ago to take a winchester model 07? in 351 and see if it couldnt be converted to .357 mag. Years ago there was a lot around cheap from prisons etc, now they seem hard to find.
Buffboy
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 701
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:13 am
Location: Gann Valley, SD

Re: Am I right in saying.....

Post by Buffboy »

When I look at the 35rem there's really not a lot of case shoulder or taper to blow out to get an "improved" version. Even if you took some neck out of it, (IMO not wise, considering the thinness of the brass and not much neck to begin with) I doubt you could get more than a grain of additional powder space even with a radical improvement so yes, I think you're right.
"People who object to weapons aren't abolishing violence, they're begging for rule by brute force, when the biggest, strongest animals among men were always automatically 'right.' Guns ended that, and social democracy is a hollow farce without an armed populace to make it work."

- L. Neil Smith
crawdaddyjim
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:01 pm

Re: Am I right in saying.....

Post by crawdaddyjim »

It comes from the factory Ackley improved. If you want more powder in .35 cal. then go to the .35 Whelen.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8355
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: Am I right in saying.....

Post by TedH »

Or 356 Winchester.
NRA Life Member
KCSO
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 780
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 3:57 pm
Location: North East Nebraska

Re: Am I right in saying.....

Post by KCSO »

The 35 Remington was designed for the Browning automatic rifle around 1900. It was designed with a fairly sharp shoulder (for the time) and a short neck. There just isn't muuch there to improve. The cartridge was chambered in the Remingtom Model 8 and later the 81 and still later in the Marlin 336. Since all of thses guns had a pressure limit of about 40,000 pounds I don't know of anyone who has attempted to hot rod this one. The closest I have seen was Waters loading a Winchester Model 70 and even then he did not go over 100 fps faster than the original M 8 loads. One of the nicest things about the old 35 Remington is that cast bullets work just a good as jacketed and can be pushed just as fast. Inside 100 yards i can't think of a better deer gun and the ballistics puts it a litttle ahead of my favorite 38-55 loads. This is one where you don't mess with sucess.
User avatar
O.S.O.K.
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 5533
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:15 pm
Location: Deep in the Piney Woods of Mississippi

Re: Am I right in saying.....

Post by O.S.O.K. »

TedH wrote:Or 356 Winchester.
+1

The .356 Winchester is an improved 35 Remington.

Brass is designed for higher pressure and the larger case volume allows for easily getting the velocity boost that you're looking for.

I'm having a 336RC 35 Rem rechambered for the .356 Win myself - this entails the chamber reaming and the face of the bolt being ground to accept the larger diameter case head - or you can just get a 30-30 bolt.

http://www.leveractions.com is doing the work for me.
NRA Endowment Life
Phi Kappa Sigma, Alpha Phi 83 "Skulls"
OCS, 120th MP Battalion, MSSG
MOLON LABE!
User avatar
Hobie
Moderator
Posts: 13902
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: Staunton, VA, USA
Contact:

Re: Am I right in saying.....

Post by Hobie »

Rifleman336 wrote:I was on another board and someone brought up a question on the .35 Remington. Am I right in saying that their no way to make it an Auckley Improved because its too close pressure wise to the casings limit or the rifles?


Rifleman 336
You'd be right if you said you couldn't blow it out or "improve" it to any appreciable degree and thus there's no value in the exercise.
Sincerely,

Hobie

"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
pharmseller
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1005
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Willamette Valley, OR, USA

Re: Am I right in saying.....

Post by pharmseller »

There's another board?

Quinn
We are determined that before the sun sets on this terrible struggle, our flag will be recognized throughout the world as a symbol of freedom on the one hand, of overwhelming power on the other.

General George C. Marshall, 1942
Post Reply