Taylors and Co. New '73

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
JBowen
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 653
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2022 8:03 pm
Location: Arkansas

Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by JBowen »

Nice looking short rifle, but the kicker is it is chambered in 9 mm! What do ya think?
https://www.taylorsfirearms.com/tc73-ri ... 0a32105418


JBowen
User avatar
KWK
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1545
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 10:31 am
Location: U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by KWK »

The cartridge selected is unusual enough, but that it's made in the US is a bigger surprise. I wonder which company is making it? What's next, a '66 carbine in 45 ACP? :)
User avatar
GunnyMack
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11740
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:57 am
Location: Not where I want to be!

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by GunnyMack »

I'm not a 9mm but if they made it in 40 ...
BROWN LABS MATTER !!
4t5
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:28 am

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by 4t5 »

No cannelure on 9 mm bullets ,what about bullet setback ?
Rumble.com/ hickock45
JBowen
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 653
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2022 8:03 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by JBowen »

4t5 wrote: Sat May 18, 2024 4:10 pm No cannelure on 9 mm bullets ,what about bullet setback ?
That could be a problem. Surely, they have tested it a great deal before they produced them?
It would be a cheap(er) plinker with 9mm being the cheapest centerfire cartridge.

JBowen
User avatar
vancelw
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3998
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:56 pm
Location: 90% NE Texas and 10% SE Montana

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by vancelw »

I handled one yesterday at the NRA show.
The weight of that rifle will prevent bullet setback.
Which is probably why they didn't choose .40 S&W or 10 mm.

I saw quite a few "replica" guns in 9mm :?
Including 1873 revolvers. Not sure what the appeal is.

Except for the 9mm Tipmann gattling guns....I want one even if I can't afford to feed it.
"Make yourself an honest man, and then you may be sure that there is one less scoundrel in the world." - Thomas Carlyle
User avatar
KWK
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1545
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 10:31 am
Location: U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by KWK »

The weight of that rifle will prevent bullet setback.
There is still the slamming of the column of bullets into the magazine's cartridge stop (the loading gate) with the cycling of a toggle link action.
User avatar
wvfarrier
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1769
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 9:27 am
Location: West (by GOD) Virginia

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by wvfarrier »

I like the idea but 10mm would be a better choice IMHO
A bondservant of our Lord, Christ Jesus
User avatar
J Miller
Member Emeritus
Posts: 14906
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Not in IL no more ... :)

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by J Miller »

9 m/m??????
What a waste of raw materials, no way Jose.


Joe
***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts ;) .***
User avatar
RIHMFIRE
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 7805
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:51 am
Location: Florida

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by RIHMFIRE »

2100+ bucks......
I don't think so!
LETS GO SHOOT'N BOYS
User avatar
COSteve
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4120
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:03 pm
Location: A little valley up in the Rockies

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by COSteve »

Per BBTI, a 125grn Cor Bon 9mm in a 16" levergun gives up about 700 fps to a 125grn Cor Bon .357mag.

That's way, way too much velocity loss to make the 9mm worth considering in my book.
Steve
18 Years into My New Career; 'Gentleman at Leisure'
Travel is Our Passion: 83 Countries and All 50 States Visited
No Matter Where You Go, There You Are
User avatar
Grizz
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 12854
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:15 pm

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by Grizz »

COSteve wrote: Fri May 24, 2024 12:17 pm Per BBTI, a 125grn Cor Bon 9mm in a 16" levergun gives up about 700 fps to a 125grn Cor Bon .357mag.

That's way, way too much velocity loss to make the 9mm worth considering in my book.
The 9mm sub2k manual says 1520fps for the 115gr+p and 589 fp muzzle energy from the 16 inch barrel. How does that compare?
User avatar
KWK
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1545
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 10:31 am
Location: U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by KWK »

COSteve wrote: Fri May 24, 2024 12:17 pm Per BBTI, a 125grn Cor Bon 9mm in a 16" levergun gives up about 700 fps to a 125grn Cor Bon .357mag.
I compare it to a 6" revolver, the latter having been used on deer. For 125 gn CorBons, they show about 125 fps difference.

There is a hunting load for the 9 that gets about 1300 fps with a cast 147 gn bullet in a carbine--not too shabby.
User avatar
RIHMFIRE
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 7805
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:51 am
Location: Florida

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by RIHMFIRE »

I heard yesterday it made here in the US....
Probably with Uberti parts
LETS GO SHOOT'N BOYS
User avatar
COSteve
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4120
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:03 pm
Location: A little valley up in the Rockies

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by COSteve »

KWK wrote: Fri May 24, 2024 11:54 pm
COSteve wrote: Fri May 24, 2024 12:17 pm Per BBTI, a 125grn Cor Bon 9mm in a 16" levergun gives up about 700 fps to a 125grn Cor Bon .357mag.
I compare it to a 6" revolver, the latter having been used on deer. For 125 gn Cor Bons, they show about 125 fps difference.

There is a hunting load for the 9 that gets about 1300 fps with a cast 147 gn bullet in a carbine--not too shabby.
My 158grn handloaded .357mag using Lil'Gun powder, produces 1,952 fps and 1,337 ft/lbs ME in my carbine. That's a .001" larger bullet that weighs more than the 9mm and it's going some 652 fps faster and producing 785 ft/lbs more ME (over twice as much).

The fact is that a 9mm cartridge in a rifle barrel can't come close to the performance of a .357mag no matter what you do.
Steve
18 Years into My New Career; 'Gentleman at Leisure'
Travel is Our Passion: 83 Countries and All 50 States Visited
No Matter Where You Go, There You Are
User avatar
KWK
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1545
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 10:31 am
Location: U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by KWK »

Quite true, but my point is the 9 is good enough for many uses.
User avatar
Griff
Posting leader...
Posts: 21425
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by Griff »

I have a feeling this will appeal to a segment of the market that uses the 9mm for gun games and will be looking for alternatives if the .gov gets their way and bans semi-auto rifles again. The made in USA is likely a draw. My understanding is that Taylor's is the manufacturer. I heartily wish them success.
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93

There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
User avatar
COSteve
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4120
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:03 pm
Location: A little valley up in the Rockies

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by COSteve »

KWK wrote: Sat May 25, 2024 7:23 pm Quite true, but my point is the 9 is good enough for many uses.
I agree that for many of you who own 9mm handguns, the attractiveness of a carbine in that caliber would be compelling. My comments weren't disparaging the caliber but rather a statement of preference.

For me, as I don't own a 9mm anything, it has no value to me. Further, as I shoot my leverguns at 200 to 300 yds, the higher velocities are necessary for a trajectory that is useful at that range. I have 1 small cased carbine, an original Ruger Police Carbine in 40s&w, and it's max useful range is only about 125 yds with my hottest handloads.

A number of folks at our range have 9mm carbines and we've agreed that the 9mm has about the same max useful range as well. You see, all of the small cased pistol calibers are at a distinct disadvantage vs the larger cased pistol calibers usually associated with a revolver as they don't have the case capacity to effectively use the slower burning magnum type pistol powders the larger cased calibers can.

The smaller cased calibers usually only gain a couple hundred fps out of a levergun as they just don't have enough powder in the case and many are slowing down in a barrel length over 16". That compares to the larger cased calibers using the magnum powders which gain 500 - 700 fps in a levergun. My chrono data shows that my .357mag and .45 Colt handloads are still accelerating in barrels as long as 24".
Steve
18 Years into My New Career; 'Gentleman at Leisure'
Travel is Our Passion: 83 Countries and All 50 States Visited
No Matter Where You Go, There You Are
User avatar
Ysabel Kid
Moderator
Posts: 29028
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA
Contact:

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by Ysabel Kid »

Not my cup of tea for that price but remember, the 9mm is now the cheapest centerfire round available. That could mean a lot of shooting, especially if one does not reload. And as a companion to a 9mm pistol? Wouldn't be the first time that has happened.
Image
User avatar
AmBraCol
Webservant
Posts: 3892
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:12 am
Location: The Center of God's Grace
Contact:

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by AmBraCol »

Judging from the amount of 9mm brass one often finds on the range, there's a segment of the population that's likely going to find it quite attractive in concept. Time will tell if they're willing to pony up the $$$ for it though.
Paul - in Pereira


"He is the best friend of American liberty who is most sincere and active in promoting true and undefiled religion." -- John Witherspoon

http://www.paulmoreland.com
http://www.pistolpackingpreachers.us
http://www.precisionandina.com
User avatar
Grizz
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 12854
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:15 pm

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by Grizz »

my kel tec 9mm is fun and easy to shoot, and knocks down the cowboy silhouette targets at the Winthrop gun range, up on Hwy 153. i reckon it's a suitable house and garden gun . . .
User avatar
Grizz
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 12854
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:15 pm

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by Grizz »

...
Last edited by Grizz on Mon May 27, 2024 11:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
junkbug
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 411
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:39 am
Location: Northern Virginia

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by junkbug »

Taylor’s kind of missed the mark. A 9mm lever gun is a great idea for anyone who doesn’t reload, online bulk ammo is half the cost of.38special. But a $2000 gun is too much, I bet the idea will sell if somebody make a 92 clone for 6 to 700 dollars.
User avatar
marlinman93
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 7202
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:40 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by marlinman93 »

Just my opinion, but I think it's a bit ugly. And who needs a recoil pad on an 1873 in 9mm? For $2100 I'd expect something closer to originals.
Pre WWI Marlins and Singleshot rifles!
http://members.tripod.com/~OregonArmsCollectors/
User avatar
wvfarrier
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1769
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 9:27 am
Location: West (by GOD) Virginia

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by wvfarrier »

I personally think the barrel length of 18" was a bad decision. 16 should be the max for legal reasons but you are not gaining anything after 12". I have tried a bunch of 9mm carbines over the years and you can actually lose velocity in longer barrels
A bondservant of our Lord, Christ Jesus
User avatar
Ysabel Kid
Moderator
Posts: 29028
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA
Contact:

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by Ysabel Kid »

junkbug wrote: Mon May 27, 2024 7:46 am Taylor’s kind of missed the mark. A 9mm lever gun is a great idea for anyone who doesn’t reload, online bulk ammo is half the cost of.38special. But a $2000 gun is too much, I bet the idea will sell if somebody make a 92 clone for 6 to 700 dollars.
Agreed, especially if they up the rounds it holds. 10? Seriously?
Image
Noah Zark
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:03 am
Location: PA

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by Noah Zark »

I bought one despite the cost, and although it's a tackdriver the barrel OD is pretty large (for an eventual 45 ACP?) which IMO makes the TC73 is heavy and clubby. The longer I handle it, the less I like it.

Noah
Might as well face it, you're addicted to guns . . .
Bill in Oregon
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 10547
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:05 am
Location: The Land of Enchantment

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by Bill in Oregon »

Absolutely not. Never. Ever.
Lastmohecken
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2062
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:42 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by Lastmohecken »

I don't see much use for it over a 357 mag instead. I was looking at the specs and one thing I think they messed up on is they gave it a 14" length of pull. That too long, that makes it hard for a kid to shoot and I find 14 inches a little long for me even. It should have been 13.5" or shorter. And it even looks out of balance to me, with that long a stock, and 18 inch barrel.
NRA Life Member, Patron
Lastmohecken
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2062
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:42 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by Lastmohecken »

Lastmohecken wrote: Tue Jan 27, 2026 9:02 pm I don't see much use for it over a 357 mag instead. I was looking at the specs and one thing I think they messed up on is they gave it a 14" length of pull. That too long, that makes it hard for a kid to shoot and I find 14 inches a little long for me even. It should have been 13.5" or shorter. And it even looks out of balance to me, with that long a stock, and 18 inch barrel.
As a matter of fact, I just went and measured several of Winchester leverguns, and a Uberti rifle, and the longest length of pull was 13.5" and the shortest was 13-1/8" all factor length of pulls. Who is the skinny chested orangutang who decided to go with 14"? Of course one could have buttstock shortened but that will cost another $150 to 250 dollars, and in my area anymore, finding a decent gunsmith that can do a good job, is getting hard to find.
NRA Life Member, Patron
jkbrea
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1318
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: Wyoming

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by jkbrea »

wvfarrier wrote: Sun May 19, 2024 6:07 am I like the idea but 10mm would be a better choice IMHO
I think Marlin came out with a 10mm levergun
User avatar
Bob Hatfield
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:49 am
Location: Daniels, WV

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by Bob Hatfield »

9mm would be the perfect caliber in this rifle and a SAA for a pragmatist. Cheap ammo, many rounds in the gun. We all play and emulate Elmer Keith, Skeeter Skelton, Brian Pearce, Tim Sundles, Matt Dillon, or the "man with no name" packing our 44's and 45's. A pragmatist can do that and pretend the 9mm is what they used. It goes bang cheaply and I can imagine it loaded with M-1152 or Buffalo bore loads and penetrating to high heaven, but I am not buying a 9mm Italian SAA or any 73 until you guys do.
veeman
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:12 pm

Re: Taylors and Co. New '73

Post by veeman »

Blasphemy!!
Post Reply