New to me pre-64 Winchester
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
-
Lastmohecken
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:42 pm
- Location: Arkansas
New to me pre-64 Winchester
No, it's not a lever gun this time. it's a model 70 Boltaction in .270, made in 1956. i looked at this thing a couple of times before at a local gunshop. It's really in pretty good shape, I think. But it doesn't have a front sight. It has some old Tally scope mounts on it. and it has the rounded blub for the rear sight, but has a blank in it. No front sight at all. The crown looks pretty good, and looks like factory to me. It has a 24" barrel. In 69 years who knows, maybe it had a 26 inch barrel and was cut off and recrowned. And I think that's what hurt it on price, because I picked it up, after some negotiations for $850 out the door. i figure it had been a slow mover for the shop, because of no front sight. i mean if it had a front and rear sight on it, original it would have been a 1200 dollar gun, i am sure. Anyway, shooting it will tell the story, we will see. I figured if the barrel is bad, the rifle would make a good candidate to re-barrel or rebore for 35 Whelen
The shop was speculating that the rifle might have been special order without a front sight, but in 1956, I kind of doubt. So the missing front sight is a mystery. Maybe the owner somewhere back down the road, had it removed or barrel shortened. I have done that to several rifles, myself.
I will try to post a picture, tomorrow.
The shop was speculating that the rifle might have been special order without a front sight, but in 1956, I kind of doubt. So the missing front sight is a mystery. Maybe the owner somewhere back down the road, had it removed or barrel shortened. I have done that to several rifles, myself.
I will try to post a picture, tomorrow.
NRA Life Member, Patron
Re: New to me pre-64 Winchester
In 1964 my dad took me to a gun shop to buy my first deer rifle with money I had earned on my paper route. I was in the market for a 30-06 and there were two on the used gun rack that caught my eye. One was a Remington 721 with open sights for $65 and the other was a beautiful Model 70 Winchester with a scope for $85. I really wanted that Winchester, but it didn't have a front sight on it. My dad pointed out that if the scope malfunctioned, there was no way to shoot it, so I bought the Remington.
The point of all this, other than to take a trip down memory lane, is that there were pre 64 Winchesters that didn't have front sights on them. As far as I know, it came from the factory like that.
The point of all this, other than to take a trip down memory lane, is that there were pre 64 Winchesters that didn't have front sights on them. As far as I know, it came from the factory like that.
-
Lastmohecken
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:42 pm
- Location: Arkansas
Re: New to me pre-64 Winchester
Thanks for telling me about that. I know later on it was not uncommon to not have sights from the factory, but in 1956 scopes were not as reliable, and many people still relied on iron sights more than they do today. So, I just thought it odd for as old a rifle as it is. And to confuse me more, it does have a dovetail for the rear sight.geobru wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 11:57 am In 1964 my dad took me to a gun shop to buy my first deer rifle with money I had earned on my paper route. I was in the market for a 30-06 and there were two on the used gun rack that caught my eye. One was a Remington 721 with open sights for $65 and the other was a beautiful Model 70 Winchester with a scope for $85. I really wanted that Winchester, but it didn't have a front sight on it. My dad pointed out that if the scope malfunctioned, there was no way to shoot it, so I bought the Remington.
The point of all this, other than to take a trip down memory lane, is that there were pre 64 Winchesters that didn't have front sights on them. As far as I know, it came from the factory like that.
NRA Life Member, Patron
-
Lastmohecken
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:42 pm
- Location: Arkansas
Re: New to me pre-64 Winchester
Here's some pictures.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
NRA Life Member, Patron
-
Lastmohecken
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:42 pm
- Location: Arkansas
Re: New to me pre-64 Winchester
A couple more pictures. I guess I will mount a scope on it for testing, and see if this thing will shoot. I don't like the looks of those Talley scope mounts, and will change them out more than likely. But other than that, the old gun doesn't look half bad for its age. I always wanted one of these, but they always seemed so expensive when I was young man, compared to a Remington 700 or something.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
NRA Life Member, Patron
Re: New to me pre-64 Winchester
Your comment on scopes not being as reliable as they now is exactly the reason for passing on the rifle.Lastmohecken wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 2:24 pm Thanks for telling me about that. I know later on it was not uncommon to not have sights from the factory, but in 1956 scopes were not as reliable, and many people still relied on iron sights more than they do today. So, I just thought it odd for as old a rifle as it is. And to confuse me more, it does have a dovetail for the rear sight.
That is a really nice rifle!
-
Lastmohecken
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:42 pm
- Location: Arkansas
Re: New to me pre-64 Winchester
Thanks, actually I was bit scared of it, but the more I look at and examine it, the better I feel about it. When I look at the lack of wear on it, for its age, I think maybe it was a bargain compared to how much they usually cost, but I have not shot it yet, so the jury is still out.
NRA Life Member, Patron
Re: New to me pre-64 Winchester
The Rifleman's rifle!
Great old Winny!
Great old Winny!
- Steve in MO
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2021 3:54 pm
- Location: SW MO
Re: New to me pre-64 Winchester
I picked up a pre-64 Model 70 .270 for my oldest son's first hunting rifle. It's a year younger than mine, but mine's 30-06. It had a Leupold scope with a frozen magnification ring. I sent it back to Leupold and they sent me a brand new scope. I mounted it back on there, then sighted it in with some .270 handloads with some 748 topped by a 130gr Nosler Accubond.
Those old pre-64s are definitely worth tracking down.
Those old pre-64s are definitely worth tracking down.
"When the shooting stops, and the dead are buried, and the politicians take over; it all adds up to one thing: a lost cause."
-
Lastmohecken
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:42 pm
- Location: Arkansas
Re: New to me pre-64 Winchester
Yes, they are. I am still getting to know this one. It had some old Tally mounts on and I went to install a scope on it today for testing and figured out that the mounts are for 30mm instead of 1", I didn't really like those mounts anyway, so I removed them and will order some Leupold's or something for a 1" scope. I wanted to test it out before buying stuff for it, I so I decided to shoot today, without sights on it. And I am happy to say, it fed, fired and ejected flawlessly, just like I would expect a good Model 70, pre 64 to do. Recoil was very mild, I guess I have been shooting too many big boomers lately, so this one was very sweet to shoot. Time to order scope mounts, I recon.Steve in MO wrote: ↑Wed Dec 31, 2025 1:59 pm I picked up a pre-64 Model 70 .270 for my oldest son's first hunting rifle. It's a year younger than mine, but mine's 30-06. It had a Leupold scope with a frozen magnification ring. I sent it back to Leupold and they sent me a brand new scope. I mounted it back on there, then sighted it in with some .270 handloads with some 748 topped by a 130gr Nosler Accubond.
Those old pre-64s are definitely worth tracking down.
NRA Life Member, Patron