...like they did in the 1990's with their magazine capacity garbage.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/fi ... r-AA1QaXpM
The idea of 'giving-in' on 'minor things' has to stop.
When lives are at stake, you CANNNOT compromise.
'Gun control' promises to 'reduce crime' (and doesn't), but what it DOES do, more slowly, is facilitate genocide, and FAR more lives are lost to genocide (consistently around 5,000 to 7,000 a day on average for the past 150 years) than 'gun violence', by a factor of at least ten-to-one. So even IF 'gun control' delivered on it's fake promises, it would still cost millions of innocent lives. NEVER compromise on gun control (or free speech).
QUESTION on the 'Glock switches' - do they just actually make the gun a 'real' full-auto, in that you could shoot less than the full magazine, or do they just cause sear-bypass and any trigger pull empties the gun...???
I'm thinking the latter, because it is so much simpler, and if that is the case, what kind of nut-case would even want such a device - it turns your pistol into nothing more than a single-shot shotgun - one blast of a bunch of bullets/pellets. Anyway - kind of like 'bump stocks' - it is in the category of a silly device with it's only 'use' to me seeming like a somewhat dangerous 'range toy'. HOWEVER, to legislate against a gun that doesn't have a 'switch' in it, just because someone COULD put one in it, is illegitimate. One COULD add nitrous to any gasoline automobile, and COULD then go too fast and then COULD run into other people, but nobody is trying to outlaw internal combust..... oh yeah - I guess the enviro-wackos ARE trying to do that...
