Search found 10 matches
- Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:57 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: OT: Dead Duck
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1083
Re: OT: Dead Duck
Yeah, I lol'ed.
- Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:40 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: 30-30 vs AR15
- Replies: 137
- Views: 18847
Re: 30-30 vs AR15
Your 336 and 1894 are not billed as "Battle Rifles" either so the comparison is irrelevant and to expect them to meet that battle rifle criteria is ludicrous. You guys use non-logic to prove your point because there is no excuse for a battle rifle to not function under any and all conditi...
- Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:27 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: How do you handle "The Question"
- Replies: 69
- Views: 6543
Re: How do you handle "The Question"
I've gotta go with Bear 45/70 on this one: not everyone who asks has an agenda. Some are just curious (but unaware that it can be a sensitive topic) or use the question as an opener to ask advice. You can usually tell who is trying to make a point. My standard answer has been (said with a smile) &qu...
- Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:02 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: 30-30 vs AR15
- Replies: 137
- Views: 18847
Re: 30-30 vs AR15
Your tone would change real fast abot the plastic rifle when in the middle of a battle the thing quit functioning on you! You guys are the ones who are laughable and wouldn't last long in a real shooting enviorment with your attitude. http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r206/Bear-45-70/Emoticons/rol...
- Sat Apr 04, 2009 1:30 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: 30-30 vs AR15
- Replies: 137
- Views: 18847
Re: 30-30 vs AR15
Your tone would change real fast abot the plastic rifle when in the middle of a battle the thing quit functioning on you! You guys are the ones who are laughable and wouldn't last long in a real shooting enviorment with your attitude. http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r206/Bear-45-70/Emoticons/rol...
- Sat Apr 04, 2009 1:18 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: 30-30 vs AR15
- Replies: 137
- Views: 18847
Re: 30-30 vs AR15
I know a guy that was gonna shoot his chinese SKS until it quit functioning. 12,000 rounds later and still working and the AK is better designed for this kind of abuse. The idea of even a 100 rounds thru an M-16 or any of it's variants is laughable at best and criminal if nothing else. Anyone that ...
- Sat Apr 04, 2009 1:15 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: 30-30 vs AR15
- Replies: 137
- Views: 18847
Re: 30-30 vs AR15
Some of the anti-M16/AR15 assertions are literally laughable and I think Otto has done a nice job of pointing out their absurdity. In no way do I discount the experiences of people. If I had one of the early M16's (non-chromed chamber, dirty powder, no cleaning gear at all), I too would think it was...
- Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:04 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: 30-30 vs AR15
- Replies: 137
- Views: 18847
Re: 30-30 vs AR15
. . . But the FAL is just so ugly. Blasphemy! lol The FAL is a sleek piece of 1950's MBR sexy badness! :lol: The FAL will always have a place in my heart because the first rifle I ever assembled was a FAL-type from a parts kit. Unfortunately, the trigger mechanism doesn't lend itself to much improv...
- Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:36 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: 30-30 vs AR15
- Replies: 137
- Views: 18847
Re: 30-30 vs AR15
Due to the ballistic hampering to the 5.56 NATO cartridge in this AR-type carbine as a result of the shortish barrel, I think of both of these carbines as good to a little over 100-some yards. Really? I knew that would draw comment. Maybe I should have elaborated: The ammunition I use with my 14.5&...
- Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:04 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: 30-30 vs AR15
- Replies: 137
- Views: 18847
Re: 30-30 vs AR15
Using your brain by stalking (if possible) to gain the upper hand isn't dirty. It's smart. How does the saying go? "If you find yourself in a fair fight, you didn't plan properly." :mrgreen: I have both a AR-type carbine (in 5.56 NATO with a collapsible stock and a 14.5" barrel with a...