New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
awp101
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 5670
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:13 pm
Location: DeeDee Snavely's Used Guns and Weapons

New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by awp101 »

I prefer carbines myself. They are handier for me and I've never noticed an accuracy difference between a rifle and carbine in my hands. Maybe because I generally use a scope when possible. :lol:

Let the debate begin! :mrgreen:
Nothing so needs reforming as other people's habits.
-Mark Twain

Proverbs 3:5; Philippians 4:13

Got to have a Jones for this
Jones for that
This running with the Joneses boy
Just ain't where it's at
User avatar
Rimfire McNutjob
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3149
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:51 pm
Location: Sanford, FL.

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Rimfire McNutjob »

I don't like barrel bands all that much ... but I don't like longer barrels either. Can I go "short rifle" please? I love the look of an 1892 in the short rifle configuration ... handy with style.
... I love poetry, long walks on the beach, and poking dead things with a stick.
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 16719
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Old Savage »

Depends on the particular rifle, I have had both work well. I can like either.
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
ohwin94_61
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:24 am

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by ohwin94_61 »

Chew on this one a while what is the barrel length on a carbine compared to a rifle everybody I asked has a different opinion
:?
Image
rjohns94
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 10820
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: York, PA

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by rjohns94 »

I love the look of a long barreled lever. Always have. I like the full length mag with them. Having said that, I have a two 16 inch, two 20 inch, one 24 inch, and one 30 inch barrel (on my sharps). The shorter barrels handle better, i like the way the longer barrels look and point.
Mike Johnson,

"Only those who will risk going too far, can possibly find out how far one can go." T.S. Eliot
awp101
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 5670
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:13 pm
Location: DeeDee Snavely's Used Guns and Weapons

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by awp101 »

ohwin94_61 wrote:Chew on this one a while what is the barrel length on a carbine compared to a rifle everybody I asked has a different opinion
:?
My understanding is:
16" is a trapper
18-20" is a carbine
22+" is a rifle
Nothing so needs reforming as other people's habits.
-Mark Twain

Proverbs 3:5; Philippians 4:13

Got to have a Jones for this
Jones for that
This running with the Joneses boy
Just ain't where it's at
User avatar
Griff
Posting leader...
Posts: 20832
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Griff »

ohwin94_61 wrote:Chew on this one a while what is the barrel length on a carbine compared to a rifle everybody I asked has a different opinion
:?
Has little to do with the length of the barrel. It's the barrel bands vs none and the style of stock that most generally differentiates a carbine from a rifle in leverguns. Unless you're talking about the none traditional style of leverguns.

Rifle, 26":
Image

Rifle, 20":
Image

Carbine, 20":
Image

Carbine, 16":
Image
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93

There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
Noah Zark
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1333
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:03 am
Location: PA

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Noah Zark »

Carbine or rifle?

I'm compelled to answer, "Yes."

Noah
Might as well face it, you're addicted to guns . . .
User avatar
Rimfire McNutjob
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3149
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:51 pm
Location: Sanford, FL.

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Rimfire McNutjob »

Thanks Griff ... I knew I liked short rifles for a reason. Now I remember why. :wink:
... I love poetry, long walks on the beach, and poking dead things with a stick.
User avatar
O.S.O.K.
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 5533
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:15 pm
Location: Deep in the Piney Woods of Mississippi

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by O.S.O.K. »

I "tend" towards carbines. But I like rifles too. Most of my levers are carbines with bands.

Most of today's huting turnbolts are really carbine type firearms - short and handy for hunting. Most have 22" barrels are are light weight.

So, I think the majority of shooters/hunters would probably answer carbine or carbine type firearm.
NRA Endowment Life
Phi Kappa Sigma, Alpha Phi 83 "Skulls"
OCS, 120th MP Battalion, MSSG
MOLON LABE!
User avatar
Andrew
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2043
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:30 pm
Location: Southern Missouri

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Andrew »

Noah Zark wrote:Carbine or rifle?

I'm compelled to answer, "Yes."

Noah
+1 to that!

And, this is not a new controversy. 8)
ImageImage
Qui tacet consentit. (silence implies consent)
The Boring Blog
awp101
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 5670
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:13 pm
Location: DeeDee Snavely's Used Guns and Weapons

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by awp101 »

Andrew wrote:And, this is not a new controversy. 8)
It's new for this week... :mrgreen:
Nothing so needs reforming as other people's habits.
-Mark Twain

Proverbs 3:5; Philippians 4:13

Got to have a Jones for this
Jones for that
This running with the Joneses boy
Just ain't where it's at
User avatar
Andrew
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2043
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:30 pm
Location: Southern Missouri

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Andrew »

awp101 wrote:It's new for this week... :mrgreen:
Oh, okay. :D
ImageImage
Qui tacet consentit. (silence implies consent)
The Boring Blog
User avatar
Griff
Posting leader...
Posts: 20832
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Griff »

Andrew wrote:
awp101 wrote:It's new for this week... :mrgreen:
Oh, okay. :D
Only if you consider today the 1st day of the week! :twisted:
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93

There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
User avatar
J Miller
Member Emeritus
Posts: 14881
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Not in IL no more ... :)

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by J Miller »

So Griff, based on your system what does that make this:
Image
It does seem to be a rifle, based on the lack of barrel bands. Yet is has a carbine but stock and a short forearm.

What say you?

Oh, and where did you get your rifle bear?

Joe
Last edited by J Miller on Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts ;) .***
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 32056
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland
Contact:

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by AJMD429 »

I always thought of a "carbine" as a short, light rifle, you could easily fire with one hand but a rifle was heavier, and not really aimable with one hand. Of course to a 350 pound hulk, a Garand would thus be a "carbine" and to my 10 year old daughter, an M1 30 carbine would be a "rifle" - but the definition works pretty well for practical purposes. An adult can easily shoot a 16"-20" levergun without taking his/her left hand off the reins/doorknob/steering wheel/nuke or whatever, and the same for an AR-15 set up as a CAR-16" - a levergun in 24-26" would be VERY difficult to do that with (without a rest) as would a 24" HBAR AR-15.

IM[ns]HO a "carbine" can do most anything I need to do out to 150 yards, but the added "stability" (mass? inertia?) of a longer, heavier, gun helps if I try to hit an egg or golfball past that distance. It isn't "sighting radius" because I usually use a scope for anything over 100 yards.
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.


Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
User avatar
Griff
Posting leader...
Posts: 20832
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Griff »

JMiller,
Rifle. Lack of barrel bands. Both new Marlins and Winchesters used a inexpensive plastic or hard rubber buttplate to reduce costs and provide a "in-between", rather than definitive buttplate.

Oh yea: My son gave the bear a few years back.

Image Moderator: We need the "strikeout" function as used in the old, old forum: [s][/s], to strikeout text
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93

There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
User avatar
gundownunder
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1449
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: Perth. Western Australia

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by gundownunder »

I always believed that the carbine had barrel bands and a barrel of 20" or under and a rifle had no bands and a barrel over 20". I understand from some of the reading that I've done that in the old days when you ordered your rifles from Winchester or Marlin or some of the other makers you could order them with custom barrel lengths from about 14" on up to a yard long. Based on classic definitions I believe my Marlin cowboy 1894 357 with 20" barrel would be classed as a short rifle. I suppose if you have a carbine with a 24" barrel you would have a "long" carbine.

If all that hasn't confused you yet, ask some more questions :? :lol:
Bob
***********************************
You have got to love democracy-
It lets you choose who your dictator is going to be.
***********************************
Bruce Scott
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1082
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:36 pm
Location: Western Australia

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Bruce Scott »

Carbine, Defitition: a short-barreled lightweight firearm originally used by cavalry.

While I agree that traditionally barrel bands maketh the levergun carbine, some just don't fit the above defintion. This 24" barrel Legacy model, for instance, would be somewhat unweildy when mounted. :)

Image
Image
User avatar
Sixgun
Posting leader...
Posts: 18639
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:17 pm
Location: S.E. Pa. Where The Finest Winchesters & Colts Reside

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Sixgun »

Rifles all the way. They handle better, swing better, hold more ammo, longer sight radius, don't throw their shots all over when they get hot, more metal for the money, hit harder when you swing one over someones head, work better as a pry bar, and just look more business like. The only carbines I like are 1886's in any caliber, Model 71's, and 1894's in 25-35, 38-55, or 32-40.---------------------------------------Sixgun
1st. Gen. Colt SAA’s, 1878 D.A.45 and a 38-55 Marlin TD

Image
User avatar
Griff
Posting leader...
Posts: 20832
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Griff »

Bruce Scott wrote:Carbine, Defitition: a short-barreled lightweight firearm originally used by cavalry.[/img]
Altogether an unsatifactory definition when there is controversy to be discussed! :lol: :mrgreen:
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93

There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
User avatar
Andrew
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2043
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:30 pm
Location: Southern Missouri

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Andrew »

Bruce Scott wrote: This 24" barrel Legacy model, for instance, would be somewhat unweildy when mounted. :)

Image
But, it looks so good, who cares? :D

To be perfectley honest, I saw my first 16" SRC Winnie the other day in a gun rack. I giggled a little. It just looked goofy in my hands and felt goofy. It would make a perfect backpack gun but I would never take it out just to shoot. I don't know, that's just me.

I wouldn't want one(barrel) less than 18"; my M44 is about right(for a carbine) at 20.25". Again, that's just me talking. Maybe my 79" arm-span has something to do with it.?
ImageImage
Qui tacet consentit. (silence implies consent)
The Boring Blog
User avatar
Hobie
Moderator
Posts: 13902
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: Staunton, VA, USA
Contact:

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Hobie »

I've spent my money on carbines so I must have seen the light... :lol: Seriously, the only "rifle" I have is the Browning 1895 .30 Krag and it is no longer than the '76 SRC.
Sincerely,

Hobie

"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
User avatar
J Miller
Member Emeritus
Posts: 14881
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Not in IL no more ... :)

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by J Miller »

Sixgun wrote:Rifles all the way. They handle better, swing better, hold more ammo, longer sight radius, don't throw their shots all over when they get hot, more metal for the money, hit harder when you swing one over someones head, work better as a pry bar, and just look more business like. The only carbines I like are 1886's in any caliber, Model 71's, and 1894's in 25-35, 38-55, or 32-40.---------------------------------------Sixgun
Sixgun,
You forgot one. They make a better paddle when your boat motor dies.

Joe
***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts ;) .***
Jaguarundi
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1804
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:27 am
Location: Wiregrass Area,Alabama

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Jaguarundi »

Well anyone that is truly disatisfied with the sudden revelation that the rifle they own just by barrel band definition became a carbine(or vice a versa)?If so-I CAN HELP!Just PM me,pack the gun up and I will pay shipping to my favorite place of business :twisted: !
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not."
User avatar
Pathfinder09
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 472
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Oregon Territory moved to upstate NY

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Pathfinder09 »

Image

Any Questions?

:twisted:
Image
Noah Zark
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1333
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:03 am
Location: PA

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Noah Zark »

Pathfinder09 wrote:
Any Questions?

Kinda fireplace insert is that?

Noah :wink:
Might as well face it, you're addicted to guns . . .
Leverdude
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1518
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Norwalk CT

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Leverdude »

I'm unprejudiced in the matter, I have rifles, short rifles, carbines & carbifles. My only requirement is the have a lever & go BANG whren theyre suposda.
tman
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3243
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:43 pm

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by tman »

if it over 20" in a lever, might as well use a bolt-action.
User avatar
Malamute
Member Emeritus
Posts: 3766
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:56 am
Location: Rocky Mts

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Malamute »

Well, everyone knows that a rifle is approximately twice as powerful as a carbine and hits like a thunderbolt, and if the rifle is a 32 Win Spl, and the carbine is a 30 WCF, then the rifle is approximately 4 times as powerful as the carbine, and hits like a twice stuck thunderbolt.










I (cough) use a carbine mostly.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-

Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
buckeyeshooter
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1259
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:57 pm

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by buckeyeshooter »

I like rifles better. The said disadvantage of barrel lenght in the woods has never happened to me. With the longer barrel you get better velocity, less recoil from heavier weight and more shots in the tube. Plus they look better :mrgreen:
brucew44guns
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1403
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: kansas

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by brucew44guns »

I have an 1886 Browning octagon rifle---that I think is my best or near best rifle, period. It's still mint and shoots like a dream. But then I take out my model 71 Browning carbine, got hi and lo grades both, I fall in love all over again. The carbine is one mans ultimate firearm, the next guy would sell it for the same thing in rifle length. That's why there are blondes, brunettes, and redheads. There ain't no right or wrong in this, in my judgement..
To hell with them fellas, buzzards gotta eat same as the worms.
Outlaw Josey Wales

Member GOA
NRA Benefactor-Life
User avatar
Old Ironsights
Posting leader...
Posts: 15084
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Waiting for the Collapse
Contact:

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Old Ironsights »

Short Rifle.

Carbines don't have the sight plane and Rifles tend to be unweildy unless you want the extra weight for recoil comp.

I think my 20" Short Rifleis the optimal compromise.
C2N14... because life is not energetic enough.
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
Leverdude
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1518
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Norwalk CT

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Leverdude »

Old Ironsights wrote:Short Rifle.

Carbines don't have the sight plane and Rifles tend to be unweildy unless you want the extra weight for recoil comp.

I think my 20" Short Rifleis the optimal compromise.
Hows your 20" short rifle have a longer sight radius than a 20" carbine? Just askin. :P
User avatar
Old Ironsights
Posting leader...
Posts: 15084
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Waiting for the Collapse
Contact:

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Old Ironsights »

Leverdude wrote:
Old Ironsights wrote:Short Rifle.

Carbines don't have the sight plane and Rifles tend to be unweildy unless you want the extra weight for recoil comp.

I think my 20" Short Rifleis the optimal compromise.
Hows your 20" short rifle have a longer sight radius than a 20" carbine? Just askin. :P
According to the EMF Hartford site (the rollstamp I orered from NKJ) the 16" is the carbine and the 20" is a "short rifle".

I would tend to agree with that assessment. IMO A 16" handles much more differently han a 20" than a 20" does feom a 24"... thus 20" = Short Rifle, sub 20" = Carbine.
C2N14... because life is not energetic enough.
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
Slick13
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:16 am

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Slick13 »

ohwin94_61 wrote:Chew on this one a while what is the barrel length on a carbine compared to a rifle everybody I asked has a different opinion
:?
In the case of leverguns, it's not barrel length that makes a gun a rifle or carbine, it's barrel bands (carbine) or the lack there of (rifle).

1866 Rifle and Carbine

http://www.winchestercollector.org/guns/1866.shtml

1873 Rifle and Carbine

http://www.winchestercollector.org/guns/1873.shtml

1876 Rifle and Carbine

http://www.winchestercollector.org/guns/1876.shtml

1886 Rifle and Carbine

http://www.winchestercollector.org/guns/1886.shtml

1892 Rifle and Carbine

http://www.winchestercollector.org/guns/1892.shtml

1894 Rifle and Carbine

http://www.winchestercollector.org/guns/1894.shtml

1895 Musket, Rifle and Carbine

http://www.winchestercollector.org/guns/1895.shtml

Standard barrel lengths (whether rifle or carbine) vary from model to model, but the basic configuration never really changes. Barrel bands = carbine. No barrel bands = rifle. The only place I've seen where this gets confusing is with Marlin's current .44 Mag 1894 where you have a combination of a rifle forearm and a single barrel band. Since it has a barrel band, I'd call it a carbine.

~Michael
Slick13
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:16 am

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Slick13 »

Bruce Scott wrote:Carbine, Defitition: a short-barreled lightweight firearm originally used by cavalry.

While I agree that traditionally barrel bands maketh the levergun carbine, some just don't fit the above defintion. This 24" barrel Legacy model, for instance, would be somewhat unweildy when mounted. :)

Image
Even though the barrel is longer than what most would consider useful as a mounted gun, it's still a carbine.

~Michael
Slick13
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:16 am

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Slick13 »

J Miller wrote:So Griff, based on your system what does that make this:
Image
It does seem to be a rifle, based on the lack of barrel bands. Yet is has a carbine but stock and a short forearm.

What say you?

Oh, and where did you get your rifle bear?

Joe
Not Griff's system, Winchester and Marlin's system. That is a short rifle.

~Michael
OD*
Member Emeritus
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:57 am
Location: Vatican City

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by OD* »

Agree with Slick, that is a short rifle with a shotgun buttstock.
Terrorists: They hated you yesterday, they hate you today, and they will hate you tomorrow.
End the cycle of hatred, don't give them a tomorrow.
wm
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:03 pm

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by wm »

Carbine or rifle?

That's like asking a man if he likes brunnettes, redheads or blondes. Nothing rational ...... you like one just because!

Wm
Gryphon Black
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 2:04 am
Location: Puget Sound

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Gryphon Black »

Rifle. 24 inch barrel. It's the perfect length. I don't care what the definition is of "carbine", or whether it's a ship or a boat.
For a lever action shooter, I like between 22 and 26 inches for aesthetics of proportion, and my 24 inch marlin feels exactly right.
My ladywife's .357 has an 18 inch barrel, which I find too short for my taste, but I still call it a rifle.
If it's designed to be operated with two hands and shoots a single slug down a rifled barrel, it's a rifle to me.
And every rifle looks better with an octagon barrel, but nobody asked about that!

Rifle. 24 inch barrel.

Gryphon
bang.
User avatar
Griff
Posting leader...
Posts: 20832
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Griff »

Old Ironsights wrote:
Leverdude wrote:
Old Ironsights wrote:Short Rifle.
Carbines don't have the sight plane (radius, both have the same sight "plane", radius is different and Rifles tend to be unweildy unless you want the extra weight for recoil comp.
I think my 20" Short Rifleis the optimal compromise.
Hows your 20" short rifle have a longer sight radius than a 20" carbine? Just askin. :P
According to the EMF Hartford site (the rollstamp I orered from NKJ) the 16" is the carbine and the 20" is a "short rifle".
I would tend to agree with that assessment. IMO A 16" handles much more differently han a 20" than a 20" does feom a 24"... thus 20" = Short Rifle, sub 20" = Carbine.
The 16" is a carbine and ommonly refered to as a "Trapper", EMF markets both 20" carbines and "Short Rifle"s; the difference being the carbine has a round bbl & two bareel bands, the "Short Rifle" has no bands around the octagon bbl.
Image

EMG/Rossi leveractions
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93

There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
OD*
Member Emeritus
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:57 am
Location: Vatican City

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by OD* »

This is a 16" "short rifle" (Winchester would have called it a "Special Short Rifle" or "Shorter than standard Rifle"). :lol:

Image
Terrorists: They hated you yesterday, they hate you today, and they will hate you tomorrow.
End the cycle of hatred, don't give them a tomorrow.
Paco
Site Owner
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 3:12 pm
Location: TUCSON,AZ.

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Paco »

[color=#804040]I LIKE BOTH BUT IF IT'S GOING TO BE SHORT THEN I WANT IT SHORT... LIKE 16 OR 18 INCHES... AND LONG IS 24 TO 26 INCHES... BOTH HAVE THERE PLACE.... AND I LIKE THE DIFFERENT FEEL OF BOTH... BY THE WAY THE REAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A LEVERGUN RIFLE AND CARBINE IS NOT LENGTH IT IS THE FORE END.... IF IT HAS A BARREL BAND IT IS A CARBINE... IF IT IS A FORE END CAP IT IS A RIFLE... I HAVE A NUMBER OF 20 INCH BARRELED RIFLES AND TWO 24 INCH BARRELED CARBINES.... THE IDEA THAT CARBINES HAD TO BE ALWAYS SHORT CAME OUT OF THE SOUTH WEST IN THE LATE 1800s.... AND THE MANUFACTURERS MOSTLY WINCHESTER AND MARLIN PICKED IT UP AND MADE IT OFFICIAL... CARBINE SHORT, RIFLE LONG.... WHEN YOU CHANGE HISTORY FROM THE TRUTH YOU HAVE TO LIVE WITH IT.... PACO[/color]
PACO/OWNER
awp101
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 5670
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:13 pm
Location: DeeDee Snavely's Used Guns and Weapons

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by awp101 »

Gryphon Black wrote:And every rifle looks better with an octagon barrel, but nobody asked about that!
I might or might not agree with that but you'll have to wait to know for sure.

Octagon vs round is next week's controversity... :lol:
Nothing so needs reforming as other people's habits.
-Mark Twain

Proverbs 3:5; Philippians 4:13

Got to have a Jones for this
Jones for that
This running with the Joneses boy
Just ain't where it's at
User avatar
Old Ironsights
Posting leader...
Posts: 15084
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Waiting for the Collapse
Contact:

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Old Ironsights »

awp101 wrote:
Gryphon Black wrote:And every rifle looks better with an octagon barrel, but nobody asked about that!
I might or might not agree with that but you'll have to wait to know for sure.

Octagon vs round is next week's controversity... :lol:
What???? There is no controversy. Half Round. I love compromises. :mrgreen:
C2N14... because life is not energetic enough.
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
NonPCnraRN
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:28 pm
Location: Stockton, CA.

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by NonPCnraRN »

wm wrote:Carbine or rifle?

That's like asking a man if he likes brunnettes, redheads or blondes. Nothing rational ...... you like one just because!

Wm
Unlike women, guns and carbines only go off when you pull the trigger, especially redheads. Ask me how I know.
awp101
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 5670
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:13 pm
Location: DeeDee Snavely's Used Guns and Weapons

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by awp101 »

NonPCnraRN wrote:
wm wrote:Carbine or rifle?

That's like asking a man if he likes brunnettes, redheads or blondes. Nothing rational ...... you like one just because!

Wm
Unlike women, guns and carbines only go off when you pull the trigger, especially redheads. Ask me how I know.
OK I'll ask...how do you know? :lol:
Nothing so needs reforming as other people's habits.
-Mark Twain

Proverbs 3:5; Philippians 4:13

Got to have a Jones for this
Jones for that
This running with the Joneses boy
Just ain't where it's at
User avatar
Poohgyrr
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 565
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 6:05 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Poohgyrr »

J Miller wrote:So Griff, based on your system what does that make this:
Image
Joe

:mrgreen:

I'm not Griff, but that looks like a Marlin that should be in my safe. :mrgreen:
Last edited by Poohgyrr on Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
John
Family, blue steel & wood, hot biscuits, and fresh coffee.
Luke 22:36 Romans 12:17-21 Ephesians 4:26-32
"Life brings sorrow and joy alike. It is what a man does with them - not what they do to him - that is the true test of his mettle." T. Roosevelt
User avatar
Poohgyrr
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 565
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 6:05 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: New controversy...carbine or rifle?

Post by Poohgyrr »

There is a certain short octagon Winchester 30-30 pictured in this thread. :D

That made me get this sweet 16" EMF octagon .44 Special from Nate:

Image
John
Family, blue steel & wood, hot biscuits, and fresh coffee.
Luke 22:36 Romans 12:17-21 Ephesians 4:26-32
"Life brings sorrow and joy alike. It is what a man does with them - not what they do to him - that is the true test of his mettle." T. Roosevelt
Post Reply