Judge Nap On Red Flag Laws

Post all political posts here.

Moderators: Hobie, AmBraCol

Forum rules
The rules are simple...
- no advocation of violence to anyone
- no cursing

Violation of the rules will result in deletion of the topic.
Post Reply
User avatar
Posting leader...
Posts: 27325
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Spanaway, Washington

Judge Nap On Red Flag Laws

#1 Post by BlaineG » Thu Aug 15, 2019 12:14 pm

He's nowhere near favorite, but he nails this one perfectly.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/judge-a ... -something
It's Hard To Look Up To Somebody When They Are Looking Down At You. :| :|

User avatar
Posting leader...
Posts: 24861
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland

Re: Judge Nap On Red Flag Laws

#2 Post by AJMD429 » Thu Aug 15, 2019 10:43 pm

Good article. Thanks for sharing.

In it he says "By then, Americans had already formed two basic political parties. The Federalists wanted a muscular central government and the Anti-Federalists wanted a loose confederation of states."


I just un-confused myself....the MODERN use of 'federalism' means a de-centralized government where the member states have significant power, but in those days, they used the term to mean a strong central government....now things make more sense.

I wish they would quit changing definitions....

'Liberal' used to mean tolerant and inclusive....now it means the opposite.

Same with 'progressive'....they ruined that word.

Anyhow the judge summed it up well.
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.

Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests