Savage 99... 'T'?

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Panzercat
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 965
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:25 pm
Location: This thread is USELESS without pics!

Savage 99... 'T'?

Post by Panzercat »

I'm kind of narrowing this down from the other post since the deal for the 1895 fell through, but I need some of your expertise concerning the Savage 99... Specifically the type T. At least I believe it to be a T, since is stamped atop the receiver just before the barrel. Silly me forgot to look at the lever boss markings to see if it matched. Even so, I'm noting a Type T (sorry, just can't bring myself to say 'Model T' :lol: ) in 308 seems exceedingly rare, made in 1966 according to savage99.come. The serial number is just over one million, 1,0xx,xxx, so the 1966 isn't exactly a stretch either (pre millions seem to be 1959 or earlier?). It has the round counter as well, the condition is 'good' to lower 'very good'.

The one site I could find even mentioning the 99t said production was very finite, nor common amongst owners and didn't even mention the possibility of a .308.
Anybody have any insight into this? $500 appears to be the asking price thought I might be able to lower the seller a bit.
...Proud owner of the 11.43×23mm automatic using depleted Thorium rounds.
User avatar
Old No7
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3593
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:06 pm
Location: Southern Maine

Re: Savage 99... 'T'?

Post by Old No7 »

I've always read that the letter code on the lever was an Inspector's Mark -- and nothing to do with the model. I believe the T'a also had a unique rear sight, with a semi-buckhorn type blade.

Maybe some others will confirm...

Old No7
"Freedom and the Second Amendment... One cannot exist without the other." © 2000 DTH
Mainehunter
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1026
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Central Maine

Re: Savage 99... 'T'?

Post by Mainehunter »

The ones I've seen and handled the butt stock and especially the fore hand stock is beefier. The checkering on the fore hand practically covers the entire stock. Red front sights were standard issue and rear buck horn sights. Never knew they made them in 308, just in 303, 300 Savage or 22HP but you never know with Savage 99's. In any case if it is or isn't a 99T, for that price in a 308 that's pretty darn good!

Mainehunter : :wink:
User avatar
Old Ironsights
Posting leader...
Posts: 15084
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Waiting for the Collapse
Contact:

Re: Savage 99... 'T'?

Post by Old Ironsights »

I've got to run right now... but I'll check Murray and my other book in a bit.
C2N14... because life is not energetic enough.
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
Pete44ru
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11242
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 7:26 am

Re: Savage 99... 'T'?

Post by Pete44ru »

Old No7 wrote:I've always read that the letter code on the lever was an Inspector's Mark -- and nothing to do with the model. I believe the T'a also had a unique rear sight, with a semi-buckhorn type blade.

Maybe some others will confirm...

Old No7

The LBC (Lever Boss Code) is a manufacturing date code, not an inspector's mark or model designation.

Many Savage Model 99's had their model designation stamped into the front face of the receiver wall ( viewable via removing the forend ) on 1 or both sides of the rotary magazine's front axle bushing, depending upon the model.

AFAIK, original Model 99T's were made from SN 350,000 to SN 400,000 during 1935-40

The only chamberings were .250-3000, .30-30, .303 Savage, & .22HP w/ 20" barrels & the .300 Savage w/ 22" barrel.

Pistol grip: checkered
Buttplate: corregated steel shotgun style
Forearm: semi-beavertail shape with blunt rounded tip
"Savage Model 99" on receiver ring top
They were not drilled and tapped
They had no sling studs

The giveaway on a T is that the stock and forearm are beefier than the regular models (R’s excluded) and the checkering on the forearm starts at the rear of the fore stock and runs all the way to the front on both sides which covers most of the forearm, 2 points on either end of it and wraps underneath as well.

Because your rifle is in .308, it's definitely not a Model 99T.

.308 Savage 99's had a longer action innard's than earlier Model 99's, and were made only as Model's 99C. 99CD, 99DE, 99DL, 99E, 99EG, 99F, & 99PE's.

.
User avatar
Old Ironsights
Posting leader...
Posts: 15084
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Waiting for the Collapse
Contact:

Re: Savage 99... 'T'?

Post by Old Ironsights »

[quote="Panzercat"...At least I believe it to be a T, since is stamped atop the receiver just before the barrel. ... Even so, I'm noting a Type T in 308 seems exceedingly rare, made in 1966 according to savage99.com...[/quote]

According to Murray: .308 First chambered in the Model 99R, 99RS, 99EG, and 99F in 1955. Available in 1985 only in 99C.

According to Royal: The Savage 99T was introduced in 1935 and discontinued in 1940...

so a .308 Savage could not be a "T" without it being a re-bore.

So... PM me a complete SN (minus last 3 if necessary) and I will report the consensus of Murray & Royal.
C2N14... because life is not energetic enough.
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
Pete44ru
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11242
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 7:26 am

Re: Savage 99... 'T'?

Post by Pete44ru »

Old Ironsights wrote:
so a .308 Savage could not be a "T" without it being a re-bore.


Sadly, not easily so - Savage 99's made prior to the introduction of the .308 in 1955 had their insides modified to handle the longer cartridge.

.
User avatar
Panzercat
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 965
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:25 pm
Location: This thread is USELESS without pics!

Re: Savage 99... 'T'?

Post by Panzercat »

According to Murray: .308 First chambered in the Model 99R, 99RS, 99EG, and 99F in 1955. Available in 1985 only in 99C.

According to Royal: The Savage 99T was introduced in 1935 and discontinued in 1940...

so a .308 Savage could not be a "T" without it being a re-bore.

So... PM me a complete SN (minus last 3 if necessary) and I will report the consensus of Murray & Royal.
I'll just throw it up in here for everybody to pick apart. 1048054
The only thing I found on the lever boss was barely comprehensible and obscenely tiny, and the only letter mark I found was on the top of the receiver between the barrel and chamber centerline; that being the 'T' stamp.
Since it's stamped .308 by savage, I doubt it's a bubba barrel job.
...Proud owner of the 11.43×23mm automatic using depleted Thorium rounds.
User avatar
Old Ironsights
Posting leader...
Posts: 15084
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Waiting for the Collapse
Contact:

Re: Savage 99... 'T'?

Post by Old Ironsights »

A SN of 1048xxx would fall between 1962 (1037000) and 1963 (1052xxx)

The lever boss should have an "N" stamp
C2N14... because life is not energetic enough.
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
User avatar
Panzercat
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 965
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:25 pm
Location: This thread is USELESS without pics!

Re: Savage 99... 'T'?

Post by Panzercat »

Old Ironsights wrote:A SN of 1048xxx would fall between 1962 (1037000) and 1963 (1052xxx)

The lever boss should have an "N" stamp
Should have, being the operative phrase here. It should be about here-- <example image>
It is not. In fact, there's nothing there. Unfortunately I can't take it apart to confirm or deny either way.
Alas.
...Proud owner of the 11.43×23mm automatic using depleted Thorium rounds.
KeithNyst
Levergunner 1.0
Posts: 99
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 11:36 pm
Location: NE Minnesota

Re: Savage 99... 'T'?

Post by KeithNyst »

The serial number is way too high for a 99T. I don't have my reference books with me, but from memory the 99T serial numbers were from about 350,000 to 400,000. The 99T was never chambered in .308 (discontinued many years before the .308 appeared). My guess would be you have a Model 99F with a 22" barrel that has a rear sight barrel boss. Look on the back right side of the barrel, just forward of the receiver ring; it may by stamped 99F there. Post a couple pics of it.

Here is a picture of my 99T.
Image
User avatar
Panzercat
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 965
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:25 pm
Location: This thread is USELESS without pics!

Re: Savage 99... 'T'?

Post by Panzercat »

KeithNyst wrote:The serial number is way too high for a 99T. I don't have my reference books with me, but from memory the 99T serial numbers were from about 350,000 to 400,000. The 99T was never chambered in .308 (discontinued many years before the .308 appeared). My guess would be you have a Model 99F with a 22" barrel that has a rear sight barrel boss. Look on the back right side of the barrel, just forward of the receiver ring; it may by stamped 99F there. Post a couple pics of it.

Here is a picture of my 99T.
Image
The deep checkering is a match, but is it an angle thing or does the forearm flare out from the receiver in the back? I guess that's what descriptions meant by 'beefier'..It's flush on the one I'm looking at. I see what we mean by running up and down the forearm as well. Ah well. That's a nice looking example, btw. The one I'm looking at doesn't look anywhere close condition wise.
...Proud owner of the 11.43×23mm automatic using depleted Thorium rounds.
User avatar
earlmck
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3437
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:10 am
Location: pert-neer middle of Oregon

Re: Savage 99... 'T'?

Post by earlmck »

Hmmm.... verrry interesting, Panzercat. Just happens both my 308's are very near that one in number. This first one with a 24" bbl, serial number 1,050,xxx is marked thusly:
308Model99M.jpg
And the other which had a 22" bbl (now rebarreled to 260) has serial number 1,035,xxx and with this marking.
308Model99F.jpg


Both the "Model - 99M" marking and the "Model - 99F" marking are on the right side of the barrel, just ahead of the receiver as you can see. I'd say the fellow doing the stamping on the day that one was made just lost his focus and messed it up. Maybe it was a Monday?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
The greatest patriot...
is he who heals the most gullies.
Patrick Henry
KeithNyst
Levergunner 1.0
Posts: 99
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 11:36 pm
Location: NE Minnesota

Re: Savage 99... 'T'?

Post by KeithNyst »

earlmck wrote:Hmmm.... verrry interesting, Panzercat. Just happens both my 308's are very near that one in number. This first one with a 24" bbl, serial number 1,050,xxx is marked thusly:
308Model99M.jpg
And the other which had a 22" bbl (now rebarreled to 260) has serial number 1,035,xxx and with this marking.
308Model99F.jpg


Both the "Model - 99M" marking and the "Model - 99F" marking are on the right side of the barrel, just ahead of the receiver as you can see. I'd say the fellow doing the stamping on the day that one was made just lost his focus and messed it up. Maybe it was a Monday?
No mess up that day. The 99M was marked on the barrels of the some of the models with Monte Carlo stocks (99DL for sure, and possibly 99DE, 99CE, 99CD) .... I think it stood for monte carlo.

The 99F marking is unique to the 99F Featherweight with the 22" barrel.
Post Reply