Its a shame! What do you think he would have weighed by fall

madman4570 · Post by **madman4570** » Sun May 11, 2014 5:10 pm

http://wnep.com/2014/05/08/trophy-class ... illegally/

ollogger · Post by **ollogger** » Sun May 11, 2014 5:39 pm

800 - 900 lb. would be my guess depending on chow, I hate when that happens!
projectile????? could be arrow or bullet? sounds strange to me
I got hit by falling limbs a few times one was nearly fatal, one went through my arm
like a spear, if the bear was shot I hope they catch the shooter

ollogger

Blaine · Post by **Blaine** » Sun May 11, 2014 6:21 pm

".....replacement costs up to $5,000 for this animal.”

Ummm.....

How would the Wildlife Dept "replace" a bear? I'm not trying to minimize the illegality of this, but, I cringe when the news sez stupid stuff......

Bullard4075 · Post by **Bullard4075** » Mon May 12, 2014 12:19 pm

They can't tell if it was killed by a bullet or an arrow???? Sounds like a college trained warden.

BrentD · Post by **BrentD** » Mon May 12, 2014 12:20 pm

BlaineG wrote:
".....replacement costs up to $5,000 for this animal.”
Ummm..... How would the Wildlife Dept "replace" a bear? I'm not trying to minimize the illegality of this, but, I cringe when the news sez stupid stuff......

By reducing quotas for legitimate hunters.

Blaine · Post by **Blaine** » Mon May 12, 2014 12:51 pm

BrentD wrote:
BlaineG wrote:
".....replacement costs up to $5,000 for this animal.”
Ummm..... How would the Wildlife Dept "replace" a bear? I'm not trying to minimize the illegality of this, but, I cringe when the news sez stupid stuff......
By reducing quotas for legitimate hunters.

Losing revenue for the tags? Hmmmm....Makes sense in a Government sort of way, don't it? "They" always think they can prove a negative, or engage in a zero sum game.

BrentD · Post by **BrentD** » Mon May 12, 2014 1:28 pm

BlaineG wrote:
BrentD wrote:
BlaineG wrote:
".....replacement costs up to $5,000 for this animal.”
Ummm..... How would the Wildlife Dept "replace" a bear? I'm not trying to minimize the illegality of this, but, I cringe when the news sez stupid stuff......
By reducing quotas for legitimate hunters.
Losing revenue for the tags? Hmmmm....Makes sense in a Government sort of way, don't it? "They" always think they can prove a negative, or engage in a zero sum game.

And how else would you do it? Or do you propose that the animal was valueless?

You are always critical but rarely constructive. How about what YOU believe should be done?

Blaine · Post by **Blaine** » Mon May 12, 2014 1:35 pm

FWIW, I was agreeing with you about tag revenue.....BTW, I'm not going to attend anymore fights you invite me to.

If you want to fight, put your head up your "6" and fight for air.

piller · Post by **piller** » Tue May 13, 2014 12:59 pm

Too bad. I agree with the thought that the game warden must have been college educated. I have a college education, am not nearly as good a shot as some of the folks on this forum whom I know, and cannot track as well. On the plus side, I think I could have looked at the wound and been able to tell if it was from an arrow of a bullet.

Its a shame! What do you think he would have weighed by fall

Its a shame! What do you think he would have weighed by fall

Re: Its a shame! What do you think he would have weighed by

Re: Its a shame! What do you think he would have weighed by

Re: Its a shame! What do you think he would have weighed by

Re: Its a shame! What do you think he would have weighed by

Re: Its a shame! What do you think he would have weighed by

Re: Its a shame! What do you think he would have weighed by

Re: Its a shame! What do you think he would have weighed by

Re: Its a shame! What do you think he would have weighed by