Original 1892 Problem

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
Pop Watts
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 383
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Original 1892 Problem

Post by Pop Watts »

Calling on you 1892 experts for a little help.

I am not sure if this has been covered before - but I just picked up an old 1892 in 32-20 and when I work the action it spits the live round out the top of the receiver at the bottom of the lever stroke.

Is this an assembly problem?

Would love some advice before I pull it apart and try to work out what is going on.

Thanks,

Pop
Nate Kiowa Jones
Site Sponsor
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 12:05 pm
Location: Lampasas, Texas
Contact:

Re: Original 1892 Problem

Post by Nate Kiowa Jones »

Pop Watts wrote:Calling on you 1892 experts for a little help.

I am not sure if this has been covered before - but I just picked up an old 1892 in 32-20 and when I work the action it spits the live round out the top of the receiver at the bottom of the lever stroke.

Is this an assembly problem?

Would love some advice before I pull it apart and try to work out what is going on.

Thanks,

Pop

Sounds like someone has been messing with the cart guides. It may well have been converted to 357m, too. The guides have to be opened up for 357. Try a 38 or 357 round hand chambered from the top.
Steve Young aka Nate Kiowa Jones Sass# 6765

Steve's Guns aka "Rossi 92 Specialists"
205 Antler lane
Lampasas, Texas 76550


http://www.stevesgunz.com

Email; steve@stevesgunz.com

Tel: 512-564-1015

Image
Pop Watts
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 383
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Original 1892 Problem

Post by Pop Watts »

Thanks Nate, I will have a look at that.

Pop.
Post Reply