Leverguns shouldn't have a safety

[The New Model 94]

This house is home to two 94's and two 9422's, all with hammer safeties. Grew up with hammer safety on my 1890 pump .22. However, I did like the tang safety on my Savage 99A and my son's Ruger 77, .270. as they match the safety/selector on my .28 gauge dbl quail gun. So, I can see both sides of this issue.

Therefore, it's obvious the New 94 must be produced in two versions, a Traditional model without AE or Tang Safety to compete with Henry, Puma, and Uberti. To satisfy the cowboy shooters, original calibers like the .25-35, .32 Special and .38-55 plus the pistol chamberings are mandatory.

Then a Hunter model with Tang Safety and Angle Eject to compete with Marlin and to appeal to younger shooters who expect a rifle to be scoped. Include calibers 7-30 Waters, .307, .356, .375, .450 Marlin. Perhaps an all-weather stock like the old Black Shadow.

Oh, wait, that's what Winchester was were doing before it went belly up.