.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-n ... r-BB1jGCnL
At least the author admitted the NRA's case was valid. I think the other one surely is, as both involve government intimidating the private sector towards political ends. In the social-media case, the private sector was 'willing' versus the banks in the NRA case likely in some cases being ambivalent.
Interesting the different take on similar legal cases...
Forum rules
The rules are simple...
- no advocation of violence to anyone
- no cursing
Violation of the rules will result in deletion of the topic.
The rules are simple...
- no advocation of violence to anyone
- no cursing
Violation of the rules will result in deletion of the topic.
-
AJMD429
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 32045
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
- Location: Hoosierland
- Contact:
Interesting the different take on similar legal cases...
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.
Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.
Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "