Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Meeteetse
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 306
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Wyoming and Texas

Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Meeteetse »

Just finished a good article in the fall Guns of the Old West magazine about the Winchester 92. Apparently the guns are being made through Browning's Japanese connection and are similar to the Browning BL-92 of a few years ago. I have a BL-92 in .357 and it is a great gun.

Does anyone know anything about the Winchester version? Has anyone had any hands-on experience with one. I know they are fairly new, but I am usually the last to find out about new products. If they are as good as the Browning BL-92, it might be a great gun. There are several versions available and they are a little pricey, but they are good looking. Anyone have any information?
All it takes for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing.

Previous member of Mr. Kelly's forum.
User avatar
Malamute
Member Emeritus
Posts: 3766
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:56 am
Location: Rocky Mts

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Malamute »

I havent heard of any newer versions, but Winchester has been having 92's made by Miroku, the same company that made the Browning 92's for a number of years. All the later guns have the rebounding hammer/tang safety setup so far as I knwo, but both are treatable conditions. If thewy are making newer versions withut the rebunding parts, I'm sure they will be popular.

My Winchester 92 limited edition, I'm replacing the standard parts with Browning 92 internals to do away with the rebounding hammer. Will either put a silver initial plate in the tang safty hole, or mount a tang sight, which neatly overs the hole. Not a fan of tang sights in general, but didn't really want to drill and tap the receiver in this case.

Image

Image
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-

Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
getitdone1
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1302
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:25 pm
Location: Indiana

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by getitdone1 »

Malamute,

Well by golly you hung-on to it. I don't know of a prettier gun. As per my recent picture, I have the standard version. Very good photo of yours. Interesting about your Browning B-92 parts replacements. I recall when you got that gun and you sounded at the time like you might not keep it.

Have you shot any hot reloads through it? I stay with mild SAA Colt loads so I don't accidentally blow-up my SAA replica handgun.

Don
User avatar
Meeteetse
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 306
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Wyoming and Texas

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Meeteetse »

I got the impression from the article that Winchester was "once again" in the levergun business after briefly closing their doors. Their new offices are just down the street from Browning in Utah. My Browning BL-92 is a beautiful gun. If the current production of Winchesters are equally good, I may have to place an order. My son wants my Marlin 1894 CB (44 mag), so this may be a good time to consider one of these Winchesters.
All it takes for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing.

Previous member of Mr. Kelly's forum.
User avatar
Malamute
Member Emeritus
Posts: 3766
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:56 am
Location: Rocky Mts

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Malamute »

Don, money was pretty tight a few times in the past few years. I did ask around about selling it, nobody had money at the time, and I ended up not having to sell it. I really don't use pistol caliber long guns much, but sure like looking at this one. I've shot some 22 grs 2400/225 gr Speer JHP loads. They're a little warm, but no drama. I may end up using it to shoot a deer in the back yard or something, but otherwise generally use a rifle caliber long gun. It wold be fine for cowboy shoots, but I do that about every 5 years, so no big need there.


Meeteetse, I ordered the parts several years ago, and have slowly been installing them. Just need to get a screw drilled and tapped in the lower tang for the trigger return spring, and install the stud that is the seat/base for the mainspring, and helps hold the trigger return spring in. The rebound can be tuned to give a harder hammer stirke if you don't feel like messing with changing internals. Many guys just use them as is without any trouble.

I beleive its the hammer, trigger, mainspring, two pieces of the mainspring strut, the mainspring seat, and trigger return spring that's required to convert to regular half cock with Browning parts. I just removed and bagged all the tiny factory parts. They can be modified to work without being a rebound setup, but I wanted it simpler and cleaner. I looked at the Browning 92 and compared before ordering parts, and am using it for a guide as to the location of the mainspring seat hole. That part is a small press in stud, it doesn't go in until the trigger return spring is in place, which needs a hole drilled and tapped before it's done. Haven't decided yet what I'm doing about the tang safety hole.

They've made a fairly large variety of model variations of the Miroku Winchester 92's, even some short rfiles and takedowns. I think they've been having Miroku do 92's for about 10-12 years now.

If anyone has a round barrel rifle Miroku 92 in 44 mag, and wants a 45 Colt, I'd swap barrels. 44 mag is a much more useful round to me. I have more guns and brass in the caliber.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-

Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
Pete44ru
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11242
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 7:26 am

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Pete44ru »

Miroku (Japan) made both the older Browning B-92's and the recent Winchester M-92's - but differently, according to contracted specs at the times (different, also).

The B-92's were made before Browning/FN purchased Winchester, so the B-92's had no lawyer safety or rebounding lock parts.

The newer "Winchester" M-92's as well as this year's "new" "Winchester" 94's are now all lawyered-up, with tang safety's and mushy rebounding hammers, etc.

IMHO Miroku's worknamship, fit, and finish are without comparison, in today's world, for mass-produced firearms - and is head & shoulders above the S.A. product, and at least heads above the Italian clones.

.
Booger Bill
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2268
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 5:23 pm

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Booger Bill »

I once had a old winchester 92 completely restored to .357. Wouldnt that still be the best solution? Granted I already owned the rifle from the 1950s, and had a machinest friend polish it out, bought new wood, had a gunsmith friend put it together, rebush the fireing pin, reblue it after I had sent it off and had it rebored. I doubt I had $200s in the project in the early 70s. Still, wouldnt that be the way to go now? I stupidly sold it. It looked new when done and was a octogon barreled rifle.
DPris
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 983
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:56 am

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by DPris »

Winchester as a separate company doesn't really exist & didn't "close their doors briefly".
Both brands have been located in Morgan, Utah, for several years. There are no "new" Winchester offices there. :)
Browning markets the Winchester-marked guns from all sources for the parent company, FN in Belgium.

Denis
Nate Kiowa Jones
Site Sponsor
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 12:05 pm
Location: Lampasas, Texas
Contact:

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Nate Kiowa Jones »

Malamute wrote:.......................................

Meeteetse, I ordered the parts several years ago, and have slowly been installing them. Just need to get a screw drilled and tapped in the lower tang for the trigger return spring, and install the stud that is the seat/base for the mainspring, and helps hold the trigger return spring in. The rebound can be tuned to give a harder hammer stirke if you don't feel like messing with changing internals. Many guys just use them as is without any trouble.

I beleive its the hammer, trigger, mainspring, two pieces of the mainspring strut, the mainspring seat, and trigger return spring that's required to convert to regular half cock with Browning parts. I just removed and bagged all the tiny factory parts. They can be modified to work without being a rebound setup, but I wanted it simpler and cleaner. I looked at the Browning 92 and compared before ordering parts, and am using it for a guide as to the location of the mainspring seat hole. That part is a small press in stud, it doesn't go in until the trigger return spring is in place, which needs a hole drilled and tapped before it's done. Haven't decided yet what I'm doing about the tang safety hole.

They've made a fairly large variety of model variations of the Miroku Winchester 92's, even some short rfiles and takedowns. I think they've been having Miroku do 92's for about 10-12 years now.

....................

I too think the fit and finish of the current Win 92 if far superior to all the other. But, all the liability parts make the gun less desirable to me.

Malamute,
A much easier conversion is to use the Rossi fire control parts. I've done a few now and for my part it adds about $200 parts and labor.

Also, if you can find this tang sight made by Uberti, it's W&E adjustable and completely covers the safe slot.

Image
Steve Young aka Nate Kiowa Jones Sass# 6765

Steve's Guns aka "Rossi 92 Specialists"
205 Antler lane
Lampasas, Texas 76550


http://www.stevesgunz.com

Email; steve@stevesgunz.com

Tel: 512-564-1015

Image
sullkat

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by sullkat »

[quote A much easier conversion is to use the Rossi fire control parts. I've done a few now and for my part it adds about $200 parts and labor.

Steve, can you expound on this? What parts are needed and where they can be purchased.
Thank you
User avatar
Malamute
Member Emeritus
Posts: 3766
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:56 am
Location: Rocky Mts

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Malamute »

Steve, I don't recall when I bought the parts, it was a couple or so years ago. I think I have less than $100 in parts, I don't think labor is going to be much, just the drill and tap one hole, and drill the hole for the seat stud. I could do it if I had to, but doing it in a mill is more accurate and square. I have a Lyman No 2A that covers nicely, just need the forward hole. Guess that will cost something also. I may end up making a silver initial plate to cover it, I'm not a big fan of tang sights in general.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-

Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
Hagler
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:52 am
Location: Leverland, U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Hagler »

Actually, gents & ladies, Olin Chemical Company owns everything Winchester gun-related. Olin "licences" the use of the name "Winchester" to whomever pays the money & agrees to certain contractural obligations.

Olin Chemical bought Winchester, during the Depression-era. FN/Herstal has been selling Olin-licenced "Winchester" firearms for over 20 years, first, as "U.S. Repeating Arms Company". Now, FN/ Herstal is selling them under the "B.A.Co" (Browning Arms Company) name. Browning has been an FN/ Herstal (Belgium-based) company for a long time, though they have had offices in Utah, as well as, other parts of the world. Both "Browning" & "Winchester" (U.S.R.A.C.), under FN/ Herstal, have sold guns that were manufactured by companies that are located in Spain, the United States, and other countries. Browning calls the Miroku factory, in Japan, one of its companies.

:!: :mrgreen: :!:...man, my head is spinning, after that! :!: :mrgreen: :!:

Shawn
"That's right, Billy, I'm good with it. I hit what I shoot at, and I'm fast!"-Lucas McCain, c1882.
ImageImage
DPris
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 983
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:56 am

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by DPris »

Convoluted story, I'll add a couple steps. :)
USRAC was originally a group of employee/investors who bought the New Haven plant when Olin decided to get out of the gun business. USRAC subsequently went through at least two other ownership groups before it was bought by FN. Toward the end, USRAC was not a company, it was just the plant that manufactured three products under "Winchester" license from Olin for FN.
Browning has handled marketing, service, and sales of Winchester marked guns for several years.
FN has not been selling Winchesters for 20 years. Current FN ownership began in 1997, when that consortium bought Winchester & Browning from GIAT in France. GIAT bought USRAC in 1992.

Browning now holds the license from Olin to import and market Winchester marked guns for FN.
Browning has had its corporate offices in Utah for a long time now, and the Winchester "division" has also been located in the same Utah town for many years.

Olin does not own "everything Winchester gun-related", merely the rights to the Winchester name.
Olin still retains the Winchester branding rights for its ammunition production.
Questionable on Browning ownership of Miroku, the only reference I've ever found substantiating that was an old article mentioning Browning owned about 7% of Miroku some years back.
Denis
DPris
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 983
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:56 am

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by DPris »

Double-checked to be up to date, answer just came in- FN and/or subsidiaries own no part of Miroku.
Denis
Hagler
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:52 am
Location: Leverland, U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Hagler »

Denis,

Thanks for adding some finer points to what I stated. I know that the history of Winchester is difficult to follow. The Leverguns page on Winchester even says much the same:

"A short & improper history":

http://www.leverguns.com/leverguns/winc ... istory.htm



While Browning does not own the Miroku Company, it certainly used to make sure to tout Miroku as one of its factories. Browning now points out that Miroku manufactures guns for them:

http://www.browningint.com/miroku/homepage.php

"Having been making Hunting Guns since 1893, Miroku not only benefits from a great gun-making experience, but also from the Japanese tradition of precision work. Miroku is distributed by Browning International, belonging to the Groupe Herstal known throughout the world for the quality and performance of its products. Browning designs, manufactures and commercializes complete ranges of arms and accessories for hunting and sports shooting."

The paragraph, above, could be worded better. It could give someone the impression that Browning/ Groupe Herstal owns Miroku, if quickly skimmed.

As for Olin not owning "everything Winchester gun-related", I will say that I could have used better wording. I think that it is fair to say that without Olin's O.K., no one can legally sell anything that says "Winchester" on it.

Shawn
"That's right, Billy, I'm good with it. I hit what I shoot at, and I'm fast!"-Lucas McCain, c1882.
ImageImage
DPris
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 983
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:56 am

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by DPris »

Gunmakers have often....blurred facts somewhat in their advertising & PR. :D
Denis
User avatar
Meeteetse
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 306
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Wyoming and Texas

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Meeteetse »

Interesting where this discussion has gone since my original question asked about the quality of the Winchester Miroku products today as they compare to the Browning labeled BL-92 products of times passed. Good information however.
All it takes for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing.

Previous member of Mr. Kelly's forum.
User avatar
Malamute
Member Emeritus
Posts: 3766
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:56 am
Location: Rocky Mts

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Malamute »

In nutshell, the quality is outstanding, every bit as good fit and finish wise as my Browning 92, if not better in the limited edition version I have. The newer style safety parts bother some people, but it's not that difficult to modufy or swap parts if you are so inclined. Many simply use them as they come and are happy with them.

(Sorry to get so far off topic)
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-

Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
Nate Kiowa Jones
Site Sponsor
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 12:05 pm
Location: Lampasas, Texas
Contact:

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Nate Kiowa Jones »

sullkat wrote:[quote A much easier conversion is to use the Rossi fire control parts. I've done a few now and for my part it adds about $200 parts and labor.

Steve, can you expound on this? What parts are needed and where they can be purchased.
Thank you
You need the hammer, hammer spring and strut, trigger and firing pin. you might try Braztech/Taurus
Steve Young aka Nate Kiowa Jones Sass# 6765

Steve's Guns aka "Rossi 92 Specialists"
205 Antler lane
Lampasas, Texas 76550


http://www.stevesgunz.com

Email; steve@stevesgunz.com

Tel: 512-564-1015

Image
User avatar
Meeteetse
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 306
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Wyoming and Texas

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Meeteetse »

Malamute wrote:In nutshell, the quality is outstanding, every bit as good fit and finish wise as my Browning 92, if not better in the limited edition version I have. The newer style safety parts bother some people, but it's not that difficult to modufy or swap parts if you are so inclined. Many simply use them as they come and are happy with them.

(Sorry to get so far off topic)
Don't take me wrong, the information is interesting and I enjoyed reading it. I just love the way you guys have such a wealth of information, and I knew we would get back on topic eventually. . . . :D :lol:
Dave
All it takes for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing.

Previous member of Mr. Kelly's forum.
trooper joe
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 2:08 pm

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by trooper joe »

I had both B-92s (the .357 and fancy .44 Mag). Sold them to a friend and last fall, bought one of the new Winchester / Miroku 92 rifles in .44 Mag. I wasn't going to buy any more rebound hammer/lawyer safety Winchesters since I already had a Davidsons 32-20 octogon barrel rifle.

However, when I tried the trigger, I told the dealer I wanted it. He tried to sell me one in a box instead of the display model, but the trigger was not as nice.

The trigger on my gun is a lot better than my original B-92s. They always seemed sort of stiff an were probably 7-8 pounds or more.

This Winchester M92 rifle is really beautiful and very accurate.

Just some thought,
Trooper Joe
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 16742
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Old Savage »

An 8 pound trigger lets you be sure of what you are shooitng at. :D
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
Lastmohecken
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1970
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:42 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by Lastmohecken »

So far, I prefer the older Brownings to the Lawyered up Winchesters. I have had misfires with the newer rebounding hammer models, However I have seen a few rifles cleaned up by Turnbill that I could have been very happy with.

I currenty own a B92, a Browning 95 and a Browning 86 and all of those were much slicker operating then the 3 Miroku Winchesters with the rebounding hammers that I tried. I no longer own the Lawyered up Winchesters.
NRA Life Member, Patron
User avatar
olyinaz
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3978
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 2:19 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by olyinaz »

Nate Kiowa Jones wrote:Also, if you can find this tang sight made by Uberti, it's W&E adjustable and completely covers the safe slot.

Image

Here's a link: http://www.uberti.com/store/Sights/Leve ... --p11.html

Cheers,
Oly
Cheers,
Oly

I hope and pray someday the world will learn
That fires we don't put out will bigger burn

Johnny Wright
OD*
Member Emeritus
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:57 am
Location: Vatican City

Re: Winchester/Browning/Miroku Model 92

Post by OD* »

Beautiful carbine Malamute. Image

Last week I picked-up one of the new Winchester 92s, the short rifle version they are calling a "trapper." In all honesty, it doesn't have a bad action, I've given thought to doing to it the same as you have, but I'm not sure I'm going to keep it. I originally want the carbine set-up like their 20" or even the large loop model, that I had planned on changing the lever if I did get one, but got inpatient and took the model that the shop could get. I don't plan on firing it, I'll either sell it or trade it back to the shop if they can find me either carbine.

Image
(Winchester stock photo)
Terrorists: They hated you yesterday, they hate you today, and they will hate you tomorrow.
End the cycle of hatred, don't give them a tomorrow.
Post Reply