More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8250
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by TedH »

Put the wet phone books to work again tonight. I was testing my home made 185 gr. 357 cal. cast bullets, and the 240 gr. Hornady XTP in 44 cal.

First up was the 357's. I shot the identical load of 15 gr. of Lil'Gun with a mag primer in my Rossi 92 with a 20" barrel and my Ruger Blackhawk with a 4 5/8" barrel. The load clocks 1750 fps from the Rossi, and 1240 from the Ruger. The bullets are cast from straight wheelweight alloy.

The bullet fired from the Rossi penetrated 18" and upset perfectly with very good expansion. The same load fired from the Ruger penetrated all 25" of books and just lodged itself in the tree that was backing the books, and didn't expand at all. Both bullets retained 100% of their weight.

Image


Next up was the Hornady 240 gr. XTP. Same load again for rifle and revolver, 24 gr. of H110. I have not crono'd this load from the Marlin, but it's 1340 fps out of my 6" barrel S&W 629. I was very surprised that the bullets fired from each gun are almost indistinguishable from each other. The bullet fired from the Marlin still weighs 223 gr. and the revolver bullet 226 gr. The bullet from the rifle did peel back more, but just ever so slightly. Both ended up in the same phone book, some 18-19 inches deep.

Image

Image


After this exercise I won't have any problem stuffing the Marlin full of this bullet for deer hunting this fall. I had some concern about the Hornady hollow point at rifle velocities, but apparently it's not something that bullet can't handle, and do so very well.

I won't be using that 357 bullet in the Blackhawk for deer hunting. But it has proven itself a very effective bullet on deer from the Rossi already. Looks like a softer alloy is needed to get some expansion at handgun velocities. Another project for another day.
Last edited by TedH on Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
NRA Life Member
User avatar
Ysabel Kid
Moderator
Posts: 27908
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA
Contact:

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by Ysabel Kid »

Same load, and the round shot from the rifle penetrated less than the one from the revolver?

Bizzare... :?
Image
User avatar
O.S.O.K.
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 5533
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:15 pm
Location: Deep in the Piney Woods of Mississippi

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by O.S.O.K. »

Interesting.

I wouldn't have any trouble hunting with any of these bullets from any of the guns tested.

The .357 Mag revolver bullet did exactly what it is supposed to do as a cast bullet. They typically do not expand from handguns yet kill very decisively when placed in the HL area.

Really, when you look at most of our testing, we are really just looking at the differences between bullets that will all do the job!

The only bullets that I will not hunt with are the ones that are so frangible that they blow-up and don't penetrate enough to reach the vitals and cause enough damage to put the game down quickly.

Thanks for sharing the pics and results though!

I still enjoy and like seeing the different results.
NRA Endowment Life
Phi Kappa Sigma, Alpha Phi 83 "Skulls"
OCS, 120th MP Battalion, MSSG
MOLON LABE!
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 16740
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by Old Savage »

Very interesting - great test - very informative.
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8250
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by TedH »

Ysabel Kid wrote:Same load, and the round shot from the rifle penetrated less than the one from the revolver?

Bizzare... :?

The bullet fired from the rifle expanded a good bit, thus reducing penetration. The bullet fired from the handgun didn't have the spank needed to expand, therefore it acted more like a solid.
NRA Life Member
User avatar
Ysabel Kid
Moderator
Posts: 27908
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA
Contact:

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by Ysabel Kid »

TedH wrote:
Ysabel Kid wrote:Same load, and the round shot from the rifle penetrated less than the one from the revolver?

Bizzare... :?

The bullet fired from the rifle expanded a good bit, thus reducing penetration. The bullet fired from the handgun didn't have the spank needed to expand, therefore it acted more like a solid.
Hadn't thought of that - and it explains it perfectly!
Image
Ben_Rumson
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2569
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 12:51 pm

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by Ben_Rumson »

Thanks for your post...
Image
Image

This jacket is what is left of an .44 XTP 240 out of a 44-40 @ about 1200fps into hard earth at 10ft ..
Note how friction left solder marks where the lands bit in... Fired these about 6 years ago
"IT IS MY OPINION, AND I AM CORRECT SO DON'T ARGUE, THE 99 SAVAGE IS THE FINEST RIFLE EVER MADE IN AMERICA."
WIL TERRY
User avatar
Tycer
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 7704
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:17 am
Location: Asheville, NC

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by Tycer »

O.S.O.K. wrote:Interesting.

I wouldn't have any trouble hunting with any of these bullets from any of the guns tested.

The .357 Mag revolver bullet did exactly what it is supposed to do as a cast bullet. They typically do not expand from handguns yet kill very decisively when placed in the HL area.

Really, when you look at most of our testing, we are really just looking at the differences between bullets that will all do the job!

The only bullets that I will not hunt with are the ones that are so frangible that they blow-up and don't penetrate enough to reach the vitals and cause enough damage to put the game down quickly.

Thanks for sharing the pics and results though!

I still enjoy and like seeing the different results.
+1

I do not want expansion in a deer bullet in 357. A hardcast leaves a clean wound channel you can eat right up to. A clean 3/4" hole from side to side or front to back bleeds out very quickly.
Kind regards,
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8250
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by TedH »

O.S.O.K. wrote: Really, when you look at most of our testing, we are really just looking at the differences between bullets that will all do the job!

Very true.
NRA Life Member
TomF
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 4:46 pm

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by TomF »

Ted, Is the 357 mold an off the shelf item or custom. I am looking for such a bullet.

TomF
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8250
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by TedH »

I guess you would call it a semi custom. It's from the Lee C358-180-RF that has run a group buy a few times over at the Cast Boolits forum. There are a few of us here that have the mold. I believe Cast Performance sells a very similar bullet as well.
NRA Life Member
User avatar
OI phones in...
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm
Location: A Cell Hole somewhere in WY...
Contact:

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by OI phones in... »

Phonebooks are tougher than IN whitetails... My ACWW 180s don't expand at 20" velocities in deer.

Try 3/1 WW/pb or do Paco's nose annealing trick...
I'm away from my computer right now, but if you will leave a message, I still have my Geek Tools...

GOT GUN? Get T-Shirt!! Stand up & fight Prohibition!
Kansas Ed
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1261
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: Wichita

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by Kansas Ed »

Nicely done, thanks for taking the time to do the testing. Things like this are always a good source of information.

Ed
User avatar
Borregos
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4756
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:40 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by Borregos »

Interesting post, thanks :D
Pete
Sometimes I wonder if it is worthwhile gnawing through the leather straps to get up in the morning..................
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8250
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by TedH »

OI phones in... wrote:Phonebooks are tougher than IN whitetails... My ACWW 180s don't expand at 20" velocities in deer.
Yeah, I kind of figured the same, but I've yet to recover one from a deer. They've always made two holes. 8)
NRA Life Member
User avatar
O.S.O.K.
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 5533
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:15 pm
Location: Deep in the Piney Woods of Mississippi

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by O.S.O.K. »

That cast .358 bullet looks very similar to their 310 .430 design:

Image
NRA Endowment Life
Phi Kappa Sigma, Alpha Phi 83 "Skulls"
OCS, 120th MP Battalion, MSSG
MOLON LABE!
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8250
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by TedH »

It is very similar. As many times as that mold has run a group buy, I'm surprised LEE hasn't put it in as a catalog item.
NRA Life Member
User avatar
CowboyTutt
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:27 pm
Location: Mission Viejo, CA

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by CowboyTutt »

I'm always pleasantly surprised how good a cast bullet from wheel weights is!

Nice report!

-Tutt
"It ain't dead! As long as there's ONE COWBOY taking care of ONE COW, it ain't dead!!!" (the Cowboy Way)
-Monte Walsh (Selleck version)

"These battered wings still kick up dust." -Peter Gabriel
User avatar
Arminius
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:20 pm
Location: Middle of Europe

Re: More bullet tests, and some surprises.

Post by Arminius »

Tycer wrote:
O.S.O.K. wrote: I do not want expansion in a deer bullet in 357. A hardcast leaves a clean wound channel you can eat right up to. A clean 3/4" hole from side to side or front to back bleeds out very quickly.
Agree with you.

So what .75 cal caliber non expanding bullet are you shooting?

Hermann
Post Reply