scotus ruling in md.
Forum rules
The rules are simple...
- no advocation of violence to anyone
- no cursing
Violation of the rules will result in deletion of the topic.
The rules are simple...
- no advocation of violence to anyone
- no cursing
Violation of the rules will result in deletion of the topic.
-
rossim92
- Senior Levergunner
- Posts: 1642
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:42 am
- Location: mechanicsville, md.
scotus ruling in md.
Is this true or some AI junk!!!!!!!!! https://youtu.be/ELjRavPgi04
Rossi 92 .357 lever , and a cz pcr 9mm
Henry .22 lever, Remington speedmaster 552 .22 lr
Marlin Glenfield .22 boltaction
gforce 12ga semi
Taylor's Tactical 1911 A1 FS in .45acp
ruger vaquero, 357 magnum
Marlin 336W .30.30
beeman sportsman rs2 dual caliber pellet rifle
henry .22 magnum pumpaction/octagon barrel
stag 5.56 m4 with reddot
Henry .22 lever, Remington speedmaster 552 .22 lr
Marlin Glenfield .22 boltaction
gforce 12ga semi
Taylor's Tactical 1911 A1 FS in .45acp
ruger vaquero, 357 magnum
Marlin 336W .30.30
beeman sportsman rs2 dual caliber pellet rifle
henry .22 magnum pumpaction/octagon barrel
stag 5.56 m4 with reddot
Re: scotus ruling in md.
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court Update - January 14, 2026
January 14, 2026
On January 14, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States issued three decisions:
This is presumably the one cited in the linked video.....
Case v. Montana, No. 24-624: This case addresses whether the “objective reasonableness” standard for warrantless home entries to render emergency aid in Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398 (2006), requires officers to have “probable cause” for the intrusion. Police officers responded to William Case’s home after a 911 call reported that Case threatened suicide and may have shot himself. The officers knocked and yelled into an open window but got no response. After seeing an empty handgun holster and what looked like a suicide note inside, the officers decided to enter the home to provide emergency aid. Case was hiding in a bedroom closet and threw open the curtain when an officer entered, holding an object that looked like a gun. Fearing he would be shot, the officer shot and injured Case, who was taken to the hospital. The officers found a handgun near where Case had stood, and Case was charged with assaulting a police officer. Case moved to suppress all evidence taken from the home entry, claiming the officers violated the Fourth Amendment by entering without a warrant. The Montana Supreme Court upheld the entry as lawful under Montana’s “community caretaker” doctrine allowing warrantless entries even absent a need to render emergency aid to an occupant. In a unanimous opinion by Justice Kagan, the Supreme Court affirmed the Montana Supreme Court’s judgment. The Supreme Court declined to put a new “probable-cause” spin onto the emergency-aid standard, clarifying that Brigham City asked simply whether an officer had “an objectively reasonable basis for believing” that entry was direly needed to prevent or deal with serious harm, and the officers had an objectively reasonable basis for believing that their entry was needed to prevent Case from ending his life. Justices Sotomayor and Gorsuch filed concurring opinions.
The Supreme Court Update - January 14, 2026
January 14, 2026
On January 14, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States issued three decisions:
This is presumably the one cited in the linked video.....
Case v. Montana, No. 24-624: This case addresses whether the “objective reasonableness” standard for warrantless home entries to render emergency aid in Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398 (2006), requires officers to have “probable cause” for the intrusion. Police officers responded to William Case’s home after a 911 call reported that Case threatened suicide and may have shot himself. The officers knocked and yelled into an open window but got no response. After seeing an empty handgun holster and what looked like a suicide note inside, the officers decided to enter the home to provide emergency aid. Case was hiding in a bedroom closet and threw open the curtain when an officer entered, holding an object that looked like a gun. Fearing he would be shot, the officer shot and injured Case, who was taken to the hospital. The officers found a handgun near where Case had stood, and Case was charged with assaulting a police officer. Case moved to suppress all evidence taken from the home entry, claiming the officers violated the Fourth Amendment by entering without a warrant. The Montana Supreme Court upheld the entry as lawful under Montana’s “community caretaker” doctrine allowing warrantless entries even absent a need to render emergency aid to an occupant. In a unanimous opinion by Justice Kagan, the Supreme Court affirmed the Montana Supreme Court’s judgment. The Supreme Court declined to put a new “probable-cause” spin onto the emergency-aid standard, clarifying that Brigham City asked simply whether an officer had “an objectively reasonable basis for believing” that entry was direly needed to prevent or deal with serious harm, and the officers had an objectively reasonable basis for believing that their entry was needed to prevent Case from ending his life. Justices Sotomayor and Gorsuch filed concurring opinions.