"Hearsay Can Be Much Better Evidence Than Direct..."

Post all political posts here.

Moderators: Hobie, AmBraCol

Forum rules
The rules are simple...
- no advocation of violence to anyone
- no cursing

Violation of the rules will result in deletion of the topic.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Old No7
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2590
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:06 pm
Location: Southern Maine

"Hearsay Can Be Much Better Evidence Than Direct..."

#1 Post by Old No7 » Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:11 pm

"Hearsay Can Be Much Better Evidence Than Direct..."

Are you kidding me ? ? ?

Old No7

In an online article (conservative P J Media) by Matt Margolis, he wrote:

Illinois Democrat Claims 'Hearsay Can Be Much Better Evidence Than Direct' Evidence

"During Wednesday's public impeachment inquiry, Republicans rightfully reaffirmed the point that neither of the two witnesses, Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs George Kent or Ambassador William Taylor, have any firsthand knowledge of President Trump's phone call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky. In fact, neither man has ever spoken with or met President Trump.

In an attempt to counter that rather devastating and inconvenient fact for the Democrats, Illinois Democrat Congressman Mike Quigley offered a bizarre defense of Kent and Taylor's lack of direct knowledge of the pertinent details of the investigation.

"I guess to close, primer on hearsay, I think the American public needs to be reminded that countless people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have routinely allowed and created, needed exceptions to hearsay," Quigley said. "Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct, as we have learned in painful instances and it's certainly valid in this instance," he added.

Can you imagine? Democrats are so determined to impeach Trump they are willing to suggest that hearsay is better than direct evidence. It's not surprising however, that a Democrat would make such a statement, especially after the Kavanaugh hearings, when Democrats were so desperate for dirt, even the most farcical allegations made against the now-Supreme Court Justice were treated as serious allegations and uncorroborated testimony by an accuser whose own witnesses denied her story was accepted as fact.

Democrats have previously shown there is no low they won't stoop to in order to save a Supreme Court seat. When they are arguing that hearsay is more valid than actual evidence in the impeachment of a president, it's clear they are willing to return to those shameful depths without blinking an eye."
"Freedom and the Second Amendment... One cannot exist without the other." © 2000 DTH

User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 25407
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland
Contact:

Re: "Hearsay Can Be Much Better Evidence Than Direct..."

#2 Post by AJMD429 » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:11 pm

But.....

"Democrats are for the 'working man'...."

and

"Only Democrats care about the environment..."

That is what 90% of our youth, and 90% of our union laborers, seem to believe... :|
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.


Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "

User avatar
Ray
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1257
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:45 am

Re: "Hearsay Can Be Much Better Evidence Than Direct..."

#3 Post by Ray » Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:48 pm

So mister trump was heavy and leaned on zelenskey a bit......heck, that's part of his job.....

He did not ask zelenskey to have his subordinates to purjure themselves and frame biden's squirt, he only asked that they look into the corruption/bribery possibilities.

On the other hand biden admits to unethical influence.....

https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/24/wa ... s-company/
m.A.g.a. !

piller
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8993
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: South of Dallas

Re: "Hearsay Can Be Much Better Evidence Than Direct..."

#4 Post by piller » Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:36 am

Biden is a Democrat, and that means he is not supposed to have to face justice even for illegal things he admits to doing.
D. Brian Casady
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests