Short range report - pic
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Short range report - pic
I bought this 1960 vintage 336SC from the local gunshop Friday. Yesterday I cleaned the bore and mounted an old 3-9 Simmons on it. I grabbed some lead reloads I had and took it out to sight it in. After getting a rough zero with the lead, I went back to 100 yards and fired 4 or 5 groups with some 200 grain core loks over H4895. What a suprise! This is typical of the groups it shot, keeping in mind that the center circle on this target is 1-5/16" in dia.
I had originally purchased this rifle to use as a project gun, but not anymore. It would be a travesty to change anything on it, what a hunter!
de k8bor
dave
I had originally purchased this rifle to use as a project gun, but not anymore. It would be a travesty to change anything on it, what a hunter!
de k8bor
dave
de k8bor
Dave
Dave
- Ysabel Kid
- Moderator
- Posts: 27838
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:10 pm
- Location: South Carolina, USA
- Contact:
- Old Savage
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 16714
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
- Location: Southern California
Allright!!!
Kind regards,
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
Tycer
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saf.org - https://peakprosperity.com/ - http://www.guntalk.com
JDL,
I wouldn't know the deluxe model from one that wasn't. What did they do differently? This one did have the white spacers and sling swivels. I honestly think the checkering was done by hand by somebody. It does have the raised cheekpiece (which I don't care for at all).
I'll will probably refinish the stocks and take the cheekpiece off at that time, as I don't have scopes on any of my lever rifles. I use them to check for bench accuracy like I did with this one, then, whenever I shoot with the open sights, if I miss, I know it was me.
I wouldn't know the deluxe model from one that wasn't. What did they do differently? This one did have the white spacers and sling swivels. I honestly think the checkering was done by hand by somebody. It does have the raised cheekpiece (which I don't care for at all).
I'll will probably refinish the stocks and take the cheekpiece off at that time, as I don't have scopes on any of my lever rifles. I use them to check for bench accuracy like I did with this one, then, whenever I shoot with the open sights, if I miss, I know it was me.
de k8bor
Dave
Dave
Those .35's will group just about the same with a peep - my 1967 SC does.
You might want to reconsider your plan to refinish the stock, sanding off the checkering & removing the cheekpiece, if it's truely a Deluxe - since a Deluxe is worth a LOT more than even a SC, and tons more than an RC.
Fellow levergunner & collector, marlinman93, can better advise you than me, as to how to ascertain if your SC is a Deluxe, or not.
I can't remember if the barrel or the inside of the buttstock was specially marked with a "D",or not, or something else.
You might want to reconsider your plan to refinish the stock, sanding off the checkering & removing the cheekpiece, if it's truely a Deluxe - since a Deluxe is worth a LOT more than even a SC, and tons more than an RC.
Fellow levergunner & collector, marlinman93, can better advise you than me, as to how to ascertain if your SC is a Deluxe, or not.
I can't remember if the barrel or the inside of the buttstock was specially marked with a "D",or not, or something else.
Last edited by Pete44ru on Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:41 am, edited 2 times in total.
These guys (MM93's a member there also) can prolly help you too. The forum, there, has a "guest" section - where you can post questions & pics.
I would suggest good pics of both sides of the stock(s) & the barrel markings.
http://www.marlin-collectors.com/forum/ ... php?t=4729
I would suggest good pics of both sides of the stock(s) & the barrel markings.
http://www.marlin-collectors.com/forum/ ... php?t=4729
Thanks, everyone for keeping me from altering my carbine. The guys on the collector's forum told me the same thing, DON'T TOUCH IT!
I appreciate your help. I'm now very proud of my acquisition. I figured that the checkering was done by hand. But I never thought they ever did that at any factories. I could tell it wasn't done by machine, because it wasn't as consistent as machine checkering and I could definitely tell it wasn't pressed.
Thanks again,
I appreciate your help. I'm now very proud of my acquisition. I figured that the checkering was done by hand. But I never thought they ever did that at any factories. I could tell it wasn't done by machine, because it wasn't as consistent as machine checkering and I could definitely tell it wasn't pressed.
Thanks again,
de k8bor
Dave
Dave