22 Magnum Schofield . . . sort of . . .

AJMD429 · Post by **AJMD429** » Sun Apr 08, 2018 10:20 pm

Now THIS looks cool....

I have a Pug but this 'Schofield' version is just cool.....

https://northamericanarms.com/product-c ... ranger-ii/

I remember their first run but they only made 500 or so then made some changes.

3leggedturtle · Post by **3leggedturtle** » Mon Apr 09, 2018 12:11 am

Tho 1st run goes for a pretty penny too. I still haven’t shot one those NAA’s yet. Todd

Bill in Oregon · Post by **Bill in Oregon** » Mon Apr 09, 2018 7:24 am

I had one of their "Earls" that is supposed to look a bit like an 1858 Remington. I just could not get that thing to shoot well. Sent it back, the rebarrelled, and still no bueno.
If that Schofield can be accurate, that would be a very cool little revolver.

Old No7 · Post by **Old No7** » Mon Apr 09, 2018 9:11 am

I "almost" got one of the 1st models when they sold for $499, but didn't; and then later when I looked again -- they had more than doubled in price and kept going up.

As a top-break collector, I'm again tempted to get one of the new ones...

Looks to me they replaced the "H&R like" top latch,which closes over a stud at the top of the frame, with a "Schofield like" locking latch that is clearly seen in the photo. I'll bet that proves to be a more secure and robust design.

Oh my... Wish I hadn't seen this posting!!!

Old No7

Pete44ru · Post by **Pete44ru** » Mon Apr 09, 2018 10:03 am

.

Just un-see it.........

.

Lefty Dude · Post by **Lefty Dude** » Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:26 pm

Y'all might wanna wait a bit. They have had some issues with the first runs.
Here is my EDC, NAA;

Post by **Ysabel Kid** » Mon Apr 09, 2018 7:34 pm

Old No7 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 09, 2018 9:11 am I "almost" got one of the 1st models when they sold for $499, but didn't; and then later when I looked again -- they had more than doubled in price and kept going up.

As a top-break collector, I'm again tempted to get one of the new ones...

Looks to me they replaced the "H&R like" top latch,which closes over a stud at the top of the frame, with a "Schofield like" locking latch that is clearly seen in the photo. I'll bet that proves to be a more secure and robust design.

Oh my... Wish I hadn't seen this posting!!!

Old No7

Enable... Enable... ENABLE...

Blaine · Post by **Blaine** » Tue Apr 10, 2018 5:22 pm

How are those stubby little things when you touch off a magnum in 'em?

And, Do you suppose there's enough barrel to burn all the powder?

Old No7 · Post by **Old No7** » Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:38 pm

BlaineG wrote: ↑Tue Apr 10, 2018 5:22 pm How are those stubby little things when you touch off a magnum in 'em? And, Do you suppose there's enough barrel to burn all the powder?

From several of the reports I read today, Hornady's new "Critical Defense" loading in 22 Mag "approaches" .380-class performance for wound channel and depth of penetration. I can't recall which review it was in, but they included images of shots from each caliber, fired into ballistic gel. The powder of Hornady's loading was also optimized for short barrels.

I'll know SOON....................

As I ordered one, paid for it, and it shipped out TODAY.

I knew I shouldn't have read this posting, or touched base with my "enabler" friend the Ysabel Kid either................

I'll just tell my wife it's Jay's fault...

Old No7

Blaine · Post by **Blaine** » Tue Apr 10, 2018 10:32 pm

I'll just tell my wife it's Jay's fault...

If you're worried, just send it to my place. I'll take real good care of it for you.

Lefty Dude · Post by **Lefty Dude** » Tue Apr 10, 2018 10:56 pm

I carry CCI/ Speer God dots in my NAA 22 mag. Wasp.

22 Magnum Schofield . . . sort of . . .

22 Magnum Schofield . . . sort of . . .

Re: 22 Magnum Schofield . . . sort of . . .

Re: 22 Magnum Schofield . . . sort of . . .

Re: 22 Magnum Schofield . . . sort of . . .

Re: 22 Magnum Schofield . . . sort of . . .

Re: 22 Magnum Schofield . . . sort of . . .

Re: 22 Magnum Schofield . . . sort of . . .

Re: 22 Magnum Schofield . . . sort of . . .

Re: 22 Magnum Schofield . . . sort of . . .

Re: 22 Magnum Schofield . . . sort of . . .

Re: 22 Magnum Schofield . . . sort of . . .