.40 S & W compared to original .38 W.C.F. load.....

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Ray
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2829
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:45 am

.40 S & W compared to original .38 W.C.F. load.....

Post by Ray »

Deleted.
Last edited by Ray on Fri Mar 04, 2022 8:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
m.A.g.a. !
Catshooter
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 996
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:19 pm
Location: South East South Dakota

Re: .40 S & W compared to original .38 W.C.F. load.....

Post by Catshooter »

I don't know why you shouldn't give it a go. Cast or jacketed though? :)


Cat
User avatar
Ray
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2829
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:45 am

Re: .40 S & W compared to original .38 W.C.F. load.....

Post by Ray »

Deleted.
Last edited by Ray on Fri Mar 04, 2022 8:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
m.A.g.a. !
jhrosier
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:47 pm
Location: New England

Re: .40 S & W compared to original .38 W.C.F. load.....

Post by jhrosier »

I think that bullet construction & performance would be important with the .40.
My choice would be the Ruger Buckeye in 10mm / 38-40 Win.

Jack
M. M. Wright
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4296
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:57 pm
Location: Vinita, I.T.

Re: .40 S & W compared to original .38 W.C.F. load.....

Post by M. M. Wright »

Sounds like a plan. Cast bullets for practice of course but Speer, (I think) makes a 190 grain hollow point that I have used in the .41 magnum with great results. You know that from the short barrel you are not going to get the velocity that a rifle or carbine would give you? Still, I like the idea.
M. M. Wright, Sheriff, Green county Arkansas (1860)
Currently living my eternal life.
NRA Life
SASS
ITSASS
User avatar
Malamute
Member Emeritus
Posts: 3766
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:56 am
Location: Rocky Mts

Re: .40 S & W compared to original .38 W.C.F. load.....

Post by Malamute »

The 41 mag bullet may be oversize for the 38 WCF/40 S&W/10mm, which I believe share a common bullet diameter.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-

Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
JB
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1475
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: WV

Re: .40 S & W compared to original .38 W.C.F. load.....

Post by JB »

Malamute wrote:The 41 mag bullet may be oversize for the 38 WCF/40 S&W/10mm, which I believe share a common bullet diameter.
Agreed, I'd stay away from the .410 bullets in a 40S&W
3leggedturtle
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 4145
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:34 am
Location: north of Palacios about 1400 miles

Re: .40 S & W compared to original .38 W.C.F. load.....

Post by 3leggedturtle »

I like to call it the 38/40NIRS for New and Improved Rimless Short. The S&B 180gr 40 ammo I shoot has a nice flat meplat. Box also says it does 980fps out of pistol. Wonder how extra FPS I'll get in my HP Carbine.
30/30 Winchester: Not accurate enough fer varmints, barely adequate for small deer; BUT In a 10" to 14" barrelled pistol; is good for moose/elk to 200 yards; ground squirrels to 300 metres

250 Savage... its what the 223 wishes it could be...!
EdinCT
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 777
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Southeast CT

Re: .40 S & W compared to original .38 W.C.F. load.....

Post by EdinCT »

I've posted before that I have shot several deer with the 38wcf and it lets them down just fine. I will admit that the shots were about 50 yards though. All but one was a pass through and it broke a shoulder and stopped in the off side ham.
Catshooter
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 996
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:19 pm
Location: South East South Dakota

Re: .40 S & W compared to original .38 W.C.F. load.....

Post by Catshooter »

I would think that most modern hollow points are built for self defense use. If I were going after deer with a .40 I'd want a cast bullet, say 180 to 200 grains or so. I'd want to make sure of penetration.

But then I'm prejudiced in favor of cast anyway.


Cat
User avatar
cas
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Under the giant W

Re: .40 S & W compared to original .38 W.C.F. load.....

Post by cas »

I pushed some XTP's.... way back when now. That was the purpose of this "page" , to show someone the bullets. http://www.cylindersmith.com/38-40Ruger-Magnum.html
Slow is just slow.
User avatar
Sixgun
Posting leader...
Posts: 18613
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:17 pm
Location: S.E. Pa. Where The Finest Winchesters & Colts Reside

Re: .40 S & W compared to original .38 W.C.F. load.....

Post by Sixgun »

That story might have been written by a past soul of me. I agree with everything he said. Today's hunters are not the riflemen nor hunter of the past. I was a bit perplexed by his one statement, "it was time for me to try out my new gun" or words to that effect, without previously sighting it in. Back in the day, when I was hunting a lot, 99% of my deer kill was under a hundred yards, most tbeing 50-60 yards and a few at about 10 yards.

My gun of choice from age 18 on was a model 1886 Winchester in 33 and people in the woods used to tell me, "is that thing powerful enough for deer?" Then back in the nineties I started using a Smith and Wesson model 29 which also easily dropped them. I now know even a 38 Spl is enough for deer, given the right load, distance, and shot placement.

The reason behind the "big powerful gun movement" had a lot to do with competition in the woods, along with contemporary advertisement, especially here in Pa. There were litterly hunters behind every third tree and the then current crop of hunters wanted their deer down instantly and right up until the early seventies, "bad people" hunters would go after other people's deer and claim them for themselves. When I was a kid we had deer stolen off of our front porch of the hunting cabin in Centre County, Pa.

Your 40 handgun will do fine but I cannot comment on jacketed bullets as I rarely use them, except in my AR's, varmint bolt guns, Garand, M1A, and John's military classic, the BAR. I believe an excellent cast bullet choice would be a 180 or 200 grain truncated bullet. These have flat noses like a semi wad cutter but a sloping angle for feeding up the ramp. In the dozen or so original rifles and handguns that I shoot in 38-40, it's all I use. In all fairness I cannot comment on their lethality as while I carried a 38-40 while hunting, I never shot anything big with it....just crows, groundhogs, foxes and the like.

Give it a big dose of a medium burning powder, like Herco or Unique and you should be good-to-go and like you said, keep your shots at 50yds or so and focus on shot placement with plenty of practice.-----6
1st. Gen. Colt SAA’s, 1878 D.A.45 and a 38-55 Marlin TD

Image
tman
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3243
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:43 pm

Re: .40 S & W compared to original .38 W.C.F. load.....

Post by tman »

Sixgun wrote:That story might have been written by a past soul of me. I agree with everything he said. Today's hunters are not the riflemen nor hunter of the past. I was a bit perplexed by his one statement, "it was time for me to try out my new gun" or words to that effect, without previously sighting it in. Back in the day, when I was hunting a lot, 99% of my deer kill was under a hundred yards, most tbeing 50-60 yards and a few at about 10 yards.

My gun of choice from age 18 on was a model 1886 Winchester in 33 and people in the woods used to tell me, "is that thing powerful enough for deer?" Then back in the nineties I started using a Smith and Wesson model 29 which also easily dropped them. I now know even a 38 Spl is enough for deer, given the right load, distance, and shot placement.

The reason behind the "big powerful gun movement" had a lot to do with competition in the woods, along with contemporary advertisement, especially here in Pa. There were litterly hunters behind every third tree and the then current crop of hunters wanted their deer down instantly and right up until the early seventies, "bad people" hunters would go after other people's deer and claim them for themselves. When I was a kid we had deer stolen off of our front porch of the hunting cabin in Centre County, Pa.

Your 40 handgun will do fine but I cannot comment on jacketed bullets as I rarely use them, except in my AR's, varmint bolt guns, Garand, M1A, and John's military classic, the BAR. I believe an excellent cast bullet choice would be a 180 or 200 grain truncated bullet. These have flat noses like a semi wad cutter but a sloping angle for feeding up the ramp. In the dozen or so original rifles and handguns that I shoot in 38-40, it's all I use. In all fairness I cannot comment on their lethality as while I carried a 38-40 while hunting, I never shot anything big with it....just crows, groundhogs, foxes and the like.

Give it a big dose of a medium burning powder, like Herco or Unique and you should be good-to-go and like you said, keep your shots at 50yds or so and focus on shot placement with plenty of practice.-----6
No truer words can be said.
User avatar
Sixgun
Posting leader...
Posts: 18613
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:17 pm
Location: S.E. Pa. Where The Finest Winchesters & Colts Reside

Re: .40 S & W compared to original .38 W.C.F. load.....

Post by Sixgun »

Thanks tman. Funny thing, sometimes I take my I-Pad with me while using the throne and I wrote those words the other morning while I was dropping off the obamas at the pool. :D -----6
1st. Gen. Colt SAA’s, 1878 D.A.45 and a 38-55 Marlin TD

Image
Post Reply