Old rifle - 5744

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 16714
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Old rifle - 5744

Post by Old Savage »

Say - didn't someone here experience something similar?

http://www.quigleymatch.com/accident-update.html
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
User avatar
vancelw
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3928
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:56 pm
Location: 90% NE Texas and 10% SE Montana

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by vancelw »

I think you are remembering that Don McDowell posted some information about this right after it happened as Don was at the Quigley that year.
"Make yourself an honest man, and then you may be sure that there is one less scoundrel in the world." - Thomas Carlyle
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 16714
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by Old Savage »

Vance, there was another one involving an old 1886. No this catastrophic. The shooter was not injured.
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
harry
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1406
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 8:33 pm
Location: West central Montana

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by harry »

Old Savage wrote:Vance, there was another one involving an old 1886. No this catastrophic. The shooter was not injured.
Thats the one from 2012 that was reported on here last summer
Trump 2024

All responses have been cleared by the law firm of "Elmer and Fudd."
Don McDowell

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by Don McDowell »

There's just no reason to shoot any smokeless powder in a rifle that was built during the blackpowder era.. Matter of fact even with blackpowder I'm not so sure those ol buggers need be run very hard..
User avatar
vancelw
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3928
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:56 pm
Location: 90% NE Texas and 10% SE Montana

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by vancelw »

Old Savage wrote:Vance, there was another one involving an old 1886. No this catastrophic. The shooter was not injured.
I either missed that one or my part-timers is acting up.

Seems like that old Ballard was getting a pretty good workout with three shooters using it for the same match
"Make yourself an honest man, and then you may be sure that there is one less scoundrel in the world." - Thomas Carlyle
FatJackDurham
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 10:18 am
Location: Morrisville,vt

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by FatJackDurham »

Were her fingers blown off and reattached, or just badly shredded?

it certainly is a cautionary tale.
Chuck 100 yd
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6972
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:52 pm
Location: Ridgefield WA. USA

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by Chuck 100 yd »

Those old Ballard rifles were not very strong to begin with ,with the early ones being made on cast receivers of unknown quality. I don`t think I would even want to push a newly made one very hard.
User avatar
Sixgun
Posting leader...
Posts: 18612
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:17 pm
Location: S.E. Pa. Where The Finest Winchesters & Colts Reside

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by Sixgun »

That was me and an old 1886 in 45-90. Cost me $4,000 to take that shot. :D (well, I did save the innards)

That load was too heavy for the lady and her original Ballard. Ballards are iron and for the most part, are not even safe with black as they are all well over a hundred years old.

My 1886 was made in '03 (destroyed in '03 :D ) but was not nickel steel.

In my 1886's in 40-65 I use 24 grains of 5744 BUT with a 270 grain bullet. Her load was a grain less but with a bullet 23% heavier. Even in my 1881 Marlin in 40-60 caliber (same as a 40-65) I drop the load to 22 grains and a 270 grain bullet.

Don't know the reason for mine blowing up. I was told it was metal fatigue. After all I did have 1800 rds. out of it with many of them fired in my youth when the brain was, well, uneducated.

My arm is still scarred up a bit, but the scars fit right in from old car, snowmobile, motorcycle wrecks and other things like chainsaws, knives, hatchets, whatever.---------------------------6

Image
1st. Gen. Colt SAA’s, 1878 D.A.45 and a 38-55 Marlin TD

Image
FatJackDurham
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 10:18 am
Location: Morrisville,vt

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by FatJackDurham »

sixgun, Looks like yours ruptured right in front of the receiver. DId the bullet get jammed in the barrel?
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 16714
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by Old Savage »

Six - scars you say - pics? :) but .... can you magnetize a golf club. :D

Image
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 16714
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by Old Savage »

Looks like the bullet may have stalled in the barrel then the powder charge went off fully there. Similar to this one

Image

Image
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
FatJackDurham
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 10:18 am
Location: Morrisville,vt

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by FatJackDurham »

Brrrrrrr. I had some delayed fire issues with my marlin last year. I am glad that didnt happen to me.
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 32029
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland
Contact:

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by AJMD429 »

Don McDowell wrote:There's just no reason to shoot any smokeless powder in a rifle that was built during the blackpowder era.. Matter of fact even with blackpowder I'm not so sure those ol buggers need be run very hard..
I was under the impression that 5744 and SR 4759 actually had slightly LESS of a pressure-spike than blackpowder, and were therefore potentially gentler on the older guns. Of course, I suppose a fatigued one will blow regardless of what powder is used.
Last edited by AJMD429 on Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.


Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
FatJackDurham
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 10:18 am
Location: Morrisville,vt

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by FatJackDurham »

I saw a pressure graph for 4759 that implied that.
User avatar
vancelw
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3928
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:56 pm
Location: 90% NE Texas and 10% SE Montana

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by vancelw »

AJMD429 wrote:
Don McDowell wrote:There's just no reason to shoot any smokeless powder in a rifle that was built during the blackpowder era.. Matter of fact even with blackpowder I'm not so sure those ol buggers need be run very hard..
I was under the impression that 5744 and SR 4759 actually had slightly LESS of a pressure-spike than blackpowder, and were therefore potentially gentler on the older guns. Of course, I suppose a fatigued one will blow regardless of what powder is used.
I just know 23 gr of 5744 doesn't fill the case like 65 gr of BP would
"Make yourself an honest man, and then you may be sure that there is one less scoundrel in the world." - Thomas Carlyle
User avatar
Sixgun
Posting leader...
Posts: 18612
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:17 pm
Location: S.E. Pa. Where The Finest Winchesters & Colts Reside

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by Sixgun »

I have also witnessed TWO other rifles that went BOOM with 5744. One was a Browning 1886 that blew off the loading gate and the other was ANOTHER 1886 in 45-90 that bulged the chamber.............mine also.

I have no idea how the cat with the Browning caused it, but I was there helping him look for the loading gate.

I had the chamber of my other 86 relined by Taylors machining. He left the barrel alone, just the chamber and the darn gun shoots better than it did before.

Yes, I continue to use 5744 as I'm not convinced that it is the powder but a mistake by me. 5744 is a very highly volatile powder and its easy to get 2 charges in the same case. Back when I had these "issues" I used an RCBS 2000 progressive (still do) and one time when I was loading 35 Winchesters, I noticed powder flowing out the top of the case before I inserted the bullet!!! The 35 Winchester case is a long one like the 45-90 and I traced it to the mechanics of the machine when using long cases......so................that's what I get for having confidence without education/experience.

Like I said, I still load all of my rifle ammo on a Pro-2000 but...........all long cases get weighed after loading and have yet to discover an overload but...........I am much more familiar . I go through at least 10-12 pounds of 5744 a year.

Well, I should not say "all" of my ammo on a Pro-2000. I still load .257 Roberts, 300 mag, and .270's one at a time. .308's and .223's get the progressive treatment and those babies will bust clay birds out to 500 meters.

Jack.........the bullet did not get stuck in the barrel. I think its still in outer space.------------------6
1st. Gen. Colt SAA’s, 1878 D.A.45 and a 38-55 Marlin TD

Image
Leverluver
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 4:02 pm
Location: WY

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by Leverluver »

A while ago both Don and I mentioned how easily 5744 bridges and shorts one load and "lengthens" the next load, when using a powder measure. I still use 5744 but I weigh charges. I would even rather dip the charges than use a powder measure. That one bad day (high static???) when I looked down inside 50 cases and found a quarter with no powder and a quarter with double charges, I got religion. Weigh or dip, that's it for me.
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 32029
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland
Contact:

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by AJMD429 »

Leverluver wrote:That one bad day (high static???) when I looked down inside 50 cases and found a quarter with no powder and a quarter with double charges, I got religion. Weigh or dip, that's it for me.
:shock: What kind of powder measure were you using...??? That's downright scary, no matter what powder you're using...!
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.


Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
Leverluver
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 4:02 pm
Location: WY

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by Leverluver »

standard run of the mill RCBS powder measure. I admit I don't know what is going on as it never even did that with Lincoln Log powders (IMR 3031, 4350, etc.). Just something odd about 5744.
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 16714
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Old rifle - 5744

Post by Old Savage »

Six, bullet did not stick the barrel of that silver Marlin either looked like it got pushed part way down then the main charge went off in the barrel. Bullet left the scene.

Wow, hadn't heard of a Browning letting go before.
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
Post Reply